Muslim scholars’ criticism towards radical Salafism


Keywords: salafism, islam, takfir, mazhab, radicalism

Abstract

In the twenty-first century Radical Salafism is a serious danger for Muslim countries and Western countries too due to some features of its religious ideas, which lead to extremist actions. Among the critics of radical Salafism there are both Western and Muslim scholars, but the arguments of the latter are not well-known in the West. The benefits of this study are systematization and analysis of prominent Muslim scholars’ criticism towards radical Salafism. The study analyzed ideas of such modern Muslim thinkers and researchers as Mohamed Said Ramadan Al-Bouti and Rawil Gaynetdin on radical Salafism. The research argued that the Muslim scholars criticize, first of all, the following four features of radical Salafism. The first of them is Salafi movement’s claim for existence of historical basis of their words about the special status of Salafism in Islam as the only defender of initial purity of Islam. The second one is radical Salafism’s criticism towards innovations in the religion and life of Muslims. The third feature is radical Salafism’s practice of takfir (accusation of unbelief). The fourth one is radical Salafists’ intolerance of people with other opinions on religion and life. The study showed that the Muslim scholars have thought that Salafism occurred much later than the Salaf era. Rawil Gainutdin believes this occurred in the tenth century, and Mohamed Said Ramadan Al-Bouti argues that it happened only in the nineteenth century. Moreover, Al-Bouti emphasizes that, firstly, the salafs assumed the possibility of certain innovations and, secondly, Salafism is one of the nineteenth century innovations. Also Rawil Gainutdin indicated that the Judge of the Judgment Day is the one person who can declare a takfir. Consequently, radical salafists’ practice of takfir is a violation of Islam law. The Muslim scholars point out that radical Salafism’s position is harmful to Muslim Ummah, because it leads to numerous conflicts. For example, Mohamed Said Ramadan Al-Bouti explains that radical salafists split Muslim community and cause tension among Muslims. He analyzed numerous facts of such a destructive action of radical Salafism towards religious, social and personal life of Muslims. Moreover, the article shows the destructive nature of Jihadist Salafism.

References

1. Al’ Hatib Ibragim Jasin, 2003. Salafitskij radikalizm i transformacija idejnyh doktrin v sunnitskom islame : avtoref. dis. na soiskanie nauch. step. kand. filos. nauk : spec. «Religiovedenie, filosofskaja antropologija, i filosofija kul’tury» [Salafi radicalism and transformation of ideological doctrines in Sunni Islam]. Mahachkala (in Russian).
2. Gaynetdin, R., 2011. Islam – religija mira [Islam is the religion of peace]. Islam: Otvet na vyzovy vremeni: vystuplenija, stat’i, interv’ju, dokumenty. Moscow, Jeksmo, 194-203 (in Russian).
3. Gaynetdin, R., 2011. Umerennost’ – kurs vospitanija musul’manskoj molodjozhi [Moderation - a course of education of Muslim youth]. Islam: Otvet na vyzovy vremeni: vystuplenija, stat’i, interv’ju, dokumenty. Moscow, Jeksmo, 500-512 (in Russian).
4. Gaynetdin, R., 2011. Umerennyj islam – vazhnejshij put’ profilaktiki jekstremizma [Moderate Islam is the most important way of preventing extremism]. Islam: Otvet na vyzovy vremeni: vystuplenija, stat’i, interv’ju, dokumenty. Moscow, Jeksmo, 523-538 (in Russian).
5. Gaynetdin, R., 2011. Uchenie Abu Hanify kak zalog tolerantnosti v sovremennom mnogokonfessional’nom obshhestve [The Teaching of Abu Hanifa as a Pledge of Tolerance in a Modern Multiconfessional Society]. Islam: Otvet na vyzovy vremeni: vystuplenija, stat’i, interv’ju, dokumenty. Moscow, Jeksmo, 628-638 (in Russian).
6. Dobaev, I. P., 2003. Islamskij radikalizm : Sushhnost’, ideologija, politicheskaja praktika [Islamic radicalism: Essence, ideology, political practice]: avtoref. dis. na soiskanie nauch. step. doktora filos. nauk : spec. «Social’naja filosofija». Rostov-na-Donu (in Russian).
7. Kanah, A., 2013. Dzhihadіjs’kij salafіzm jak nove javishhe u mіzhnarodnіj polіticі [Jihadist Salafism is a new phenomenon in international politics]. Ukraїns’ke relіgієznavstvo 68: 109 -117 (in Ukrainian).
8. Ramadan Al-Bouti, 2008. Salafija [Salafia]. Ansar (in Russian).
9. Hajbulaev, Z. H., 2001. Vahhabizm v islame : Istoki i sovremennost’ [Wahhabism in Islam: Origins and the Present]: avtoref. dis. na soiskanie nauch. step. kand. filos. nauk : spec. «Religiovedenie, filosofskaja antropologija, i filosofija kul’tury». Mahachkala (in Russian).
10. Global Salafism: Islam’s New Religious Movement, 2014. Ed. R. Meijer. Oxford University Press (in English).
11. Lauzière, H., 2015. The Making of Salafism: Islamic Reform in the Twentieth Century. – Columbia University Press (in English).
Published
2017-11-01
How to Cite
Nesprava, M. (2017). Muslim scholars’ criticism towards radical Salafism. Grani, 20(8), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.15421/1717110
Section
Статті