Submissions

Author Guidelines

1. Technical requirements. Articles are accepted by e-mail: granidp@gmail.com. The approximate volume of the text is 24,000 characters with spaces. The text is submitted in the MS Word editor (* .doc / docx).
The article must contain the UDC (in the upper left corner).
Tables, graphs, figures, diagrams, diagrams, photos are placed in the text immediately after the first mention of them and are numbered in the order of their mention in the text. They should be compact - no more than the width of the page, have a title, preferably - the font of the text Times New Roman, size 12 pt.

2. Information about the author includes: full name, job position, academic rank and degree, telephone number, email, postal address, ORCID, full official title of scientific institution and its address. This information is provided separately in Ukrainian, Russian and English languages. We draw your attention to the need of specifying not a free translation but officially accepted scientific title of the institution in English language.

3. Requirements to the article structure. The articles are accepted in one of three languages ­ Ukrainian, Russian and English. Title of the article should be given in original language and in English. Editorial staff of the journal recommends the next structure of the article (problem definition, analysis of the research and publications, the purpose of the research, the main material, conclusions). Please highlight the titles of these sections in semi­bold type.

4. The abstract is a mandatory part of the publication. Abstract should have not less then 1800 characters. The abstract should be informative and full of substance. Please do not use any undefined abbreviations or unspecified references. The abstract should be understandable without reading the paper. Keywords: 7-9 items.

5. References. Review paper may have any number of sections of any names. Only Conclusion is obligatory. Cite references in the text by name and year in parentheses. Please use the following reference style in the text: one author – (Vinson, 1997), 2 authors – (Vargo and Laurel, 1994; Vargo and Hulsey, 2000), 3 and more authors – (Davis et al., 1989; Jones et al., 1978).

6. The publication of articles is made after internal and external reviews. Authors who have no academic degree, research papers accompanying the scientific supervisor ­ PhD / Doctor of science degree for publication or extract of the minutes of the recommendation of the Department of the article for publication. For researchers who have an advanced degree such conditions are not required. The authors are responsible for the content, the accuracy of the facts, quotes, numbers and names. The editors reserve the right for a little change and reduction, as well as literary fix articles (with preservation of the main conclusions and style of the author).

7. They are published for a fee after the approval of the members of the editorial board article, namely USD 4  / page (2000 signs) + USD 20 / 1 printed copy.

Privacy Statement

Names and email addresses that users enter the site of this journal will be used exclusively to internal technical problems of this magazine; they will not be extended and transferred to third parties.

Patients and Study Participants: Patients have a right to privacy that should not be violated without informed consent. Identifying information, including names, initials, or hospital numbers, should not be published in written descriptions, photographs, or pedigrees unless the information is essential for scientific purposes and the patient (or parent or guardian) gives written informed consent for publication. Informed consent for this purpose requires that an identifiable patient be shown the manuscript to be published. Authors should disclose to these patients whether any potential identifiable material might be available via the Internet as well as in print after publication. Patient consent should be written and archived with the journal, the authors, or both, as dictated by local regulations or laws. The Journal requires that all authors obtain written patient consent and that this be archived by the author and available for inspection for a period of at least three years. A written statement should be included in the manuscript that attests that the authors have obtained and archived written patient consent. Nonessential identifying details should be omitted. Informed consent should be obtained if there is any doubt that anonymity can be maintained. For example, masking the eye region in photographs of patients is inadequate protection of anonymity. If identifying characteristics are altered to protect anonymity, such as in genetic pedigrees, authors should provide assurance, and editors should so note, that such alterations do not distort scientific meaning.

Manuscripts that include human subjects must include a statement that written informed consent was obtained. If materials or records derived from humans are included, the statement that approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Ethics Committee was obtained prior to initiation of the study, if it is required by the institution. When reporting experiments on human subjects, authors should indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, the authors must explain the rationale for their approach and demonstrate that the institutional review body explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. When reporting experiments on animals, authors should indicate whether the institutional and national guide for the care and use of laboratory animals was followed.

Manuscripts will be reviewed with due respect for authors’ and reviewers’ confidentiality. Our editors have been instructed to not disclose information about manuscripts (including their receipt, content, status in the reviewing process, criticism by reviewers, or ultimate fate) to anyone other than the authors and reviewers. Manuscripts sent for review are privileged communications. Therefore, reviewers and members of the editorial staff must respect the authors’ rights by not publicly discussing the authors’ work or appropriating their ideas before the manuscript is published. Reviewers may not make copies of the manuscript for their files and will not share it with others, except with the editor’s permission. Reviewers should return or destroy copies of manuscripts after submitting reviews.