Comparative method in historical sciences and teaching


  • G. G. Krivchik Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan
Keywords: dialectic, didactic, investigation, methodology, principle, comparison

Abstract

The comparative method plays an important role in historical cognition. Firstly, comparison gives the opportunity to understand better the essence of phenomena. Secondly, while comparing, a researcher goes beyond a narrow topic, uses additional empirical material and eventually expands his scientific outlook and creative range. The latter is one of the main indicators of the scholar’s scientific qualification. Thirdly, the comparative method improves a dialectical view of phenomena and processes, since it is focused on examining them in contradictions and development.Use of the comparative method requires a researcher to adhere to the basic historical methodological principles. At first, to operate not with the individual, selected and favorable facts, but with the whole set of different and sometimes contradictory facts, since even the most obvious facts, when taken out of the context, can give the wrong picture (the principle of consistency). At second, to avoid political, ideological, religious and other conjuncture and at the same time to take into account the subjective component of any historical works and written sources (the principle of objectivity). At third, to take into account a particular historical era, its laws, ethical norms and traditions (the principle of historicism) while analyzing facts, phenomena and the behavior of historical characters. At fourth, to take into account the specific historical conditions and circumstances, comparing phenomena and processes, not to make conclusions about their identity on the basis of external, accidental similarity. At fifth, to take for the comparison the facts, which are of the same dimension, if the comparison is carried out horizontally, and, on the contrary, to compare the similar phenomena, if the comparison is carried out vertically, i.e., in different time frames (the principle of comparability).The special significance of the comparative method is because of the fact that it is not only a scientific, but also a didactic method. Teaching of historical disciplines in both secondary and higher schools allows:1) the visualization, better memorization of educational material, which becomes even better in case of making a comparative table and especially with the participation of students (pupils) in the practical class;2) the repetition of the studied material;3) the reliance on previous knowledge;4) the formation of the skills of scientific analysis, generalization, selection of typical and special knowledge by students (pupils);5) the formation of dialectical thinking.

References

1. Barg,M.A., 1984. Kategorii i metody istoricheskoj nauki [Categories and methods of historical science]. Nauka, Moscow, 344
(in Russian).
2. Bibliya. Knigi svyashchennogo pisaniya Vethogo i Novogo Zaveta [Bible. Books of the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments].
3. Bisk, I. Yа., 2007. Metodologiya istorii: kurs lekcij [Methodology of history: a course of lectures]. IGU, Ivanovo, 236 (in Russian).
4. Boffa, Dzh., 1996.Ot SSSR k Rossii: Istoriya neokonchennogo krizisa. 1964 – 1994 [From the USSR to Russia: The history of the unfinished crisis. 1964 - 1994]. Mezhd.otn., Moscow, 320 (in Russian).
5. Dolzhenkov, O.O., 2013. Porivnyal′nyy metod yak metod politologichnyh doslidzhen′ [Comparative method as a method of political research] [Elektr. resurs]. Access mode: Social-science.com.ua/article/983 (in Ukrainian).
6. Karamzin, N. M., 1988. Istoriya Gosudarstva Rossijskogo [History of State Russian]. Reprint.vosproizvedenie izdaniya pyatogo, 1842 - 1844 gg., vypushchennogo v trekh knigah. Kn. 1. –T.1. Kniga, Moscow, 155 (in Russian).
7. Klyuchevskij, V.O.,1989. Metodologiya russkoj istorii [Methodology of Russian History]. 1884/85 akademicheskij god. 5 - 93 // Soch. v 9-ti t. – T. VІ (Special’nye kursy) / Podred. V.L. Yanina. Mysl’, Moscow (in Russian).
8. Kobyl′nik, V.V., 2011. Porivnyal′nij metod kak osnova politologichnogo doslidzhennya [Comparative method as the basis of political research] // Politologichni studii. 2.54 – 65 ((in Ukrainian).
9. Koval’chenko, I.D., 2003. Metody istoricheskogo issledovaniya [Methods of historical research] /Otdelenie istoriko-filologicheskih nauk. 2-e izd, dop.486. Nauka,Moscow (in Russian).
10. Kolomijcev, V.F., 2001. Metodologiya istorii (ot istochnika k issledovaniyu) [Methodology of history (from source to investigation)]. ROSSPEN, Moscow, 191 (in Russian).
11. Markaryan, E.S., 1966. Ob osnovnyh principah sravnitel’nogo izucheniya istorii [On the basic principles of comparative study of history]. 7. 18 - 31 // Voprosy istorii, Moscow (in Russian).
12. Mogil’nickij, B.G., 1989.Vvedenie v metodologiyu istorii [Introduction to the methodology of history]. Vysshaya shkola, Moscow, 175 (in Russian).
13. Sambutyan, Yu. G., 2004. Sravnitelnya politologiya kak napravlenie sovremennoy nauki [Comparative political science as a direction of modern science of politics] 1. (5). Vestnik Rossiskogo universiteta druzhbi narodov, Seriya«Politologiya».Moscow, 55-56 (in Russian).
14. Sancevich, A. V., 1990. Metodika istoricheskogo issledovaniya [Methods of historical research] / A.V. Sancevich; ANUSSR, Institut istorii. – 2-eizd., pererab.,dop. Nauk. dumka, Kyiv, 210(in Ukrainian).
15. Smolkin, A.M., 1991. Metody aktivnogo obucheniya [Methods of active learning] / A.M. Smolkin. Vysshaya shkola, Moscow, 176 (in Russian).
16. Smorgunov, L.V., 2002. Sovremennaja sravnitel′naja politologiya [Contemporary Comparative Politics]. Ros. polit. enciklopedija, Moscow, 472 (in Russian).
17. Solov’ev, S.M., 1989. Soch. V 18 kn. Kn. ІV.Istoriya Rossii s drevnejshih vremen [History of Russia since ancient times]. T. 7 – 8 / Otv. red. I.D. Koval’chenko, S.S. Dmitriev. Mysl’, Moscow, 752 (in Russian).
18. Suvorov, V., 1984. Den’ «M». Kogda nachalas’ Vtoraya mirovaya vojna (Ledokol – 2) [Day «M». When the Second World War began (Icebreaker – 2)]. Access mode: book-online.com.ua/read.php.
19. Tatishchev, V.N., 2011. Otskifov do slavyan. Istoriya Rossijskaya vo vsej ee polnote [From the Scythians to the Slavs. History Russian in its entirety]. Eksmo; Algoritm, Moscow, 544 (in Russian).
20. Toynbee, A.J., 1995. Doslіdzhennya іstorії [History research]: u 2-h t. – T`. 1 / Per. z ang. V. Shovkuna. Osnovi, Kyiv, 614
(in Ukrainian).
21. Chilkote, R.H., 2001. Teorii sravnitel’noy politologii. V poiskah paradigmy [Theories of comparative politics. The Search for Paradigm Reconsidered ]: per. s ang. V. Galkina. INFRA-M, Moscow, 559 (in Russian).
22. Comparative Political Science (SAGE Library of Political Science) by Alan S. Zuckerman (Editor). Hardcover – August 11, 2008. 1 – 4, 1664 (in English).
23. Comparative Politics Today. A world view. 1984. General editor: Gabriel A. Almond, G. Bingham Powel, Jr. Stanford University / University of Rochester. Third edition. Little Brown and Company, Boston – Toronto. 742 (in English).
24. Comparative Politics Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Edited by Mark Irving Lichach, Alan S. Zuckerman. Edition 2nd.. May 14, 2009. Cambridge University Press. 365 (in English).
25. Dogan, M., Pellassy, D., 1990. How to Compare Nations. Strategies in Comparative Politics. Edition 2nd. Chatham House Publishers. 224 (in English).
Published
2017-08-07
How to Cite
Krivchik, G. (2017). Comparative method in historical sciences and teaching. Grani, 20(6), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.15421/171788
Section
Статті