Cognitive spectrum of the social mission of the rehabilitation park
Abstracthe article is part of research topics in the field of sociology of social work. It is devoted to the selection methodology study social mission innovations such as rehabilitation park. The latter is defined as a territorial space is limited on the territory of which individuals with disabilities can take the help of the physical, spiritual and psychological recovery and social rehabilitation.The use of elements of cognitive approach allowed the author to determine the impact on the formation of social rehabilitation of the park’s mission stakeholders such as children with disabilities, their parents, officials of relevant departments of local power, grantors, local community representatives, staff and managers of the park. Formulated their demands and requirements are: the restoration of physical health, the development of spiritual, intellectual, and social abilities of children; career, wages, benefits package, as well as factors of self employees and managers of the park; satisfaction of needs for care status of the subject charity sponsors and donors; effective operation of the park, the development of social partnership, tolerance, empathy, capacity on its territory of cultural and festive event. Under the influence of these claims and inquiries central to the social mission of the rehabilitation of the park stands the idea of systemic physical, emotional and spiritual recovery, intellectual and social development.It is emphasized that reflection on these requests exceeds the social rehabilitation of the park’s mission within cognitive umbrellas. Six peaks of logically combining achieve the same number of subjects or groups of the latter. Continuous and dashed bar side, combining the top chimney in the middle to form eight triangles. Four of the past, for example, continuous parties combine discipline with which to achieve the main objectives of the study. This position caused the author to include rationale for the creation and operation of the pilot facility for Ukraine as rehabilitation park scientific and practical achievements of social, medical, educational, architectural, psychological disciplines and ethics. Accordingly, the principles of anthropocentrism, humanism, behaviorism conceptual definition of the publication.
Bezpal’ko, O.V., 2005. Sotsial’na robota v hromadi [Social work in the community]. Kiev, Centr Navchal’noi Literatury, 176 (in Ukrainian).
Berger, P., Lukman, T., 1995. Social’noe konstruirovanie real’nosti [Social construction of reality]. Moscow, Logos, 296 (in Russian).
Kashhenko, V.P., 1994. Pedagogicheskaja korrekcija: Ispr. nedostatkov haraktera u detej i podrostkov [Pedagogical correction: Ispra. Lack of character in children and adolescents]. Moscow, Prosvesheniye, 223 (in Russian).
Rakitov, A.I., 1991. Kognitivnaja nauka i intellektual’naja tehnologija [Cognitive Science and Intellectual Technology]. Moscow, INION, 274 (in Russian).
Lakoff, Dzh., 1996. Kognitivnaja semantika [Cognitive semantics]. Moscow, Progress, 143-184 (in Russian).
Makklelland, D., 2007. Motivacija cheloveka [Motivation of a person]. Sankt-Petersburg, Piter, 672 (in Russian).
Yakovenko, N.P., Petryashev, I.O., 2013. Medychna i sotsial’na reabilitatsiya [Medical and social rehabilitation]. Kiev, 464 (in Ukrainian).
Montessori, M., 2009. Vpityvajushhij razum rebenka [Absorbing mind of the child]. Sankt-Petersburg, 320 (in Russian).
Nechyporenko, V.V., 2006. Stanovlennya osvitn’o-reabilitatsiynoho zakladu novoho typu [The formation of a new type of educational and rehabilitation institution]. Zaporizhzhya, 592 (in Ukrainian).
Parsons, T., 1972. Obshhij obzor [General review]. Moscow, Nauchnaya mysl’ 328 (in Russian).
Pan’ko, T.V., Kalens’ka, H.Yu., Fedchenko, V.Yu., Denysenko, M.M., 2015. Patopsykholohichni osoblyvosti tryvozhnykh rozladiv endohennoho pokhodzhennya [Pathopsychological features of anxiety disorders of endogenous origin]. Kharkiv, 90-94
Plotinskij, Ju.M., 2001. Modeli social’nyh proces sov [Models of social processes]. Moscow, Logos, 296 (in Russian).
Pryymak, Yu.O., 2007. Formuvannya komunikatyvnoho stylya sub»yekta nadannya administratyvnykh posluh [Formation of the communicative style of the subject of the provision of administrative services]. Kharkiv, 198–199 (in Ukrainian).
Sergeev, V.M., 1987. Kognitivnye metody v social’nyh issledovanijah [Cognitive methods in social studies]. Moscow, 162 (in Russian).
Solso, R., 1996. Kognitivnaja psihologija [Cognitive Psychology]. Moscow, Trivola, 282 (in Russian).
Sorokin, P.A., 2006. Social’naja i kul’turnaja dinamika [Social and cultural dynamics]. Moscow, 1176 (in Russian).
Fediy, O.A., 2007. Estetoterapiya : navchal’nyy posibnyk [Aesthetics: A tutorial]. Kiev, 256 (in Ukrainian).
Firsov, M.V., Shapiro, B.Ju., 2007. Psihologija social’noj raboty. Soderzhanie i metody psihosocial’noj praktiki [Psychology of social work. The content and methods of psychosocial practice]. Moscow, 192 (in Russian).
Hajdegger, M., 2001. Osnovnye problemy fenomenologii [The main problems of phenomenology]. Sankt-Petersburg, 418 (in Russian).