The correlation between concepts of «uncertainty», «risk», «challenge», «threat», «danger» in the context of the sociology of operating security

  • L. V. Kalashnikova Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University
Keywords: uncertainty, risk, challenge, threat, danger, security


In sociology the understanding of the essence of operation security’s concept is inextricably linked with the concepts of «uncertainty», «risk», «challenge», «threat», «danger». The logical ordering of these concepts will allow characterizing the layered structure of the phenomenon of operating security, revealing the specific state of the object of operating security and evaluating the degree of influence of destabilizing factors. Uncertainty should be viewed as trends in the state of an object over time.Uncertainty as such is closely linked with the concept of risk. Reduction of the risk is necessary for minimization of the ignorance and uncertainty. The risk determines the probability of damage to the operating security object, which is in a state of dynamic equilibrium and is constantly changing. The challenge is a minimal risk, it is distinguished by the presence of the imaginary readiness to prevent the damage of the security object. The threat is characterized by realism, a focus on a high degree of readiness to prevent the damage of the security object. Danger is the combination of factors that can have a negative impact on nature, human society, technological systems. The risk is characterized by the hypothetical absence of the addressee, which is aimed at its impact.The differences between the concepts of «uncertainty», «risk», «challenge», «threat», «danger» have been revealed through the subjective intention and objective capabilities, which characterize objects’ and subjects’ security. The greatest risk is associated with the presence of threats, which are characterized by the presence of two components at one time. A high or medium level of risk is determined by the presence of at least one component. Whereas minimal risk is the absence of a component in a specific point in time, but with the possibility of one of them in future.Analysis of the concepts led to the conclusion that all these concepts are related to one another by the degree of damage to the individual, society and state. The use of these categories will allow ranking the range of possible threats to the security of life and will contribute to the development of adequate, appropriate technologies to combat it, to minimize their negative effects and, consequently, will improve the current system of ensuring safety of personality, society and state.


1. Fоuсаult, М., 1977. Discipline and рunish. The birth оf the prison. N. Y.: Random House, 318 (in English).
2. Bek, U., 2000. Obshhestvo riska. Na puti k drugomu modernu [The risk society. On the way to another modernity]. Moscow: Progress-Tradicija, 384 (in Russian).
3. Brega, A.V., 2010. Risk v sisteme kategorij, harakterizujushhih antitezu nacional’noj bezopasnosti [Risk in the system of categories that characterize the antithesis of national security] / Nacional’naja bezopasnost’: nauchnoe i gosudarstvennoe upravlencheskoe soderzhanie: materialy Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferencii. Moscow: Nauchnyj jekspert, 737-753 (in Russian).
4. Rogozin, D.O. (Eds.), 2004. Vojna i mir v terminah i opredelenijah [War and peace in terms and definitions]. Moscow: Izdatel’skij dom «Porog», 624 (in Russian).
5. Gacko, M.F., 2014. Osnovy nacional’noj bezopasnosti: Uchebnoe posobie [National security: training manual]. Noginsk: Izdanie Noginskogo filiala RANH i GS, 130 (in Russian).
6. Giddens, J., 1994. Sud’ba, risk i bezopasnost’ [Fate, risk and security]. Thesis 5, 40-102 (in Russian).
7. Dorozhkina, T.V., Krutikov, V.K., Alekseeva, E.V., 2014 Upravlenie riskami. Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie [Risk Management. Educational-methodical manual]. Kaluga: Izd-vo «Vash Dom», 233 (in Russian).
8. Zelenkov, M., 2015. Opasnost’, ugroza – bazovye kategorii teorii nacional’noj bezopasnosti [Danger, threat – a basic category of the theory of national security]. Nacional’naja bezopasnost’ 1, 32-47 (in Russian).
9. Ivanenko, V.I., 1990. Problema neopredelennosti v zadachah prinjatija reshenij [The Problem of uncertainty in decision-making problems]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 136 (in Russian).
10. Kravchuk, A.A., 2016. Kategorii «vyzov», «opasnost’», «ugroza» v teorii nacional’noj bezopasnosti [The category of «challenge», «danger», «threat» in the theory of national security]. Vestnik Zabajkal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta 22, 11, 65-74 (in Russian).
11. Luman, N., 1994. Ponjatie riska [The concept of risk]. Thesis, Vol. 5, 135-160 (in Russian).
12. Marguljan, J., 2012. Social’nye opasnosti i ugrozy lichnosti, obshhestvu i gosudarstvu: istochniki i prichiny [Social danger and threat to the individual, society and the state: the sources and causes]. Vestnik Erevanskogo universiteta. Serija: Obshhestvennye nauki. Sociologija. Jekonomika 136.5, 20-28 (in Russian).
13. Meskon, M.H., Al’bert, M., Hedouri, F., 1997. Osnovy menedzhmenta [Fundamentals of management]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo «Delo», 704 (in Russian).
14. Najt, F.H., 2003. Risk, neopredelennost’ i pribyl’ [Risk, uncertainty and profit]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo «Delo», 358 (in Russian).
15. Nejman, D., Morgenshtern, O., 1970. Teorija igr i jekonomicheskoe povedenie [Theory of games and economic behavior]. Moscow: Nauka, 708 (in Russian).
16. Parashhuk, I.B., Bashkircev, A.S., Mihajlichenko, N.V., 2017. Analiz urovnej i vidov neopredelennosti, vlijajushhej na prinjatie reshenij po upravleniju informacionnymi sistemami [Analysis of the levels and types of uncertainty affecting decision making in management information systems]. Informacija i kosmos 1(7), 112-120 (in Russian).
17. Pochepcov, G.G., 2004. Strategicheskij analiz [Strategic analysis]. Har’kov: Izdatel’stvo «Dzvin», 334 (in Russian).
18. Bajuk, O.A. (Eds.), 2014. Prinjatie finansovyh reshenij v uslovijah sravnitel’noj neopredelennosti [Financial decision-making in conditions of comparative uncertainty]. Moscow: Vuzovskij uchebnik, 106 (in Russian).
19. Ritcer, D., 2011. Makdonal’dizacija obshhestva 5 [The McDonaldization of society 5]. Moscow: Izdatel’skaja i konsaltingovaja gruppa «Praksis», 592 (in Russian).
20. Romanjuk, A.V., 2007. Neopredelennost’ v predprinimatel’skoj dejatel’nosti [Uncertainty in business]. Gornyj informacionno-analiticheskij bjulleten’, No9, 80-86 (in Russian).
21. Smirnov J.A., 2000. Razrabotka upravlencheskih reshenij [Development of managerial decisions]. Moscow: JuNITI-DANA, 271 (in Russian).
22. Ulitin, R.R., 2003. Sootnoshenie ponjatij «nacional’nyj interes» i «nacional’naja bezopasnost’» v trudah zapadnyh i otechestvennyh issledovatelej [The relationship between the concepts of «national interest» and «national security» in the works of Western and Russian researchers]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo 1, 129-137 (in Russian).
23. Utkin, J.A., Frolov, D.A., 2003. Upravlenie riskami predprijatija [Enterprise risk management]. Moscow: TEIS, 247 (in Russian).
24. Filin, S., Pankratova, J., 2001. Prognozirovanie pribyli venchurnyh proektov [Forecasting profit venture projects]. Resursy, informacija, snabzhenie, konkurencija 2, 19-28 (in Russian).
25. Cel’mer, G., 1980. Uchet riska pri prinjatii upravlencheskih reshenij [Accounting for risk when making managerial decisions]. Problemy MSNTI 3, 94-105 (in Russian).
26. Shapkin, A.S., 2003. Jekonomicheskie i finansovye riski. Ocenka, upravlenie, portfel’ investicij [Economic and financial risks. Assessment, management, investment portfolio]. Moscow: Izdatel’sko-torgovaja korporacija «Dashkov i Ko», 544 (in Russian).
How to Cite
Kalashnikova, L. (2017). The correlation between concepts of «uncertainty», «risk», «challenge», «threat», «danger» in the context of the sociology of operating security. Grani, 20(5), 16-23.