Formation and development of sociology in the Dnepropetrovsk region
Keywords:
soviet sociological association, social planning, Academy of sciences of social technologies, sociological education, sociological culture.
Abstract
The article is devoted to the history of becoming and development of sociological education in the Dnepropetrovsk region (from creation of the first sociological organizations, leadthroughs of the first sociological researches to functioning of department of sociology and its activity on the modern stage). Shows the activity of the Dnipropetrovsk regional branch of the Sociological Association of Ukraine. Highlights the main goal for sociologists of the city - the formation of sociological culture that predpalagaet development of sociology and sociological education.
Published
2017-07-13
How to Cite
Gorodyanenko, V. (2017). Formation and development of sociology in the Dnepropetrovsk region. Grani, 16(8), 137-140. Retrieved from https://grani.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/963
Issue
Section
Статті
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
When reporting experiments on human subjects, authors should indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, the authors must explain the rationale for their approach, and demonstrate that the institutional review body explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. When reporting experiments on animals, authors should be asked to indicate whether the institutional and national guide for the care and use of laboratory animals was followed.
When reporting experiments on human subjects, authors should indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, the authors must explain the rationale for their approach, and demonstrate that the institutional review body explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. When reporting experiments on animals, authors should be asked to indicate whether the institutional and national guide for the care and use of laboratory animals was followed.
