Ukrainian thinkers on philosophical and religious ideas of revelation and transfiguration: metodological prinsiples

  • Z. I. Timenyk Lviv polytechnic national university
Keywords: inter-religious consciousness, religious logics, revelation studies


The article has been based on legacy of Ukrainian thinkers of 1840s-1960s. The author has highlighted how the discussed ideas function in close proximity to analogous ideas. For instance, the idea of God has been reviewed from the viewpoint of human and world structure, with the idea of interaction between good-evil, light-darkness. While interpreting the topic of the article, the reasonable interdependence of principles, ratios and other constructs has been justified by researcher. A complex of such processes creates a so-called “cascade” in which elements of (inter)religious communications and multidisciplinary space become a reality through harmonized temporhythmics from various dimensions. At the same time, essential features of the revelation of nature and God on the borderline of paganism and Christianity have been distinguished in a systemic manner. Under the above-mentioned circumstances, “religious logics” demonstrates its possibilities. It is indispensable during the analysis of given ideas. When we think about the regularity of stage-by-stage transformation of the very concepts “revelation”, “transfiguration” comes to the said borderline. Big attention has been paid by the researcher to manifestations of partiality or wholeness of these notions from the standpoint of their harmony. Real functioning of “religious logics” gave ground to the introduction of such new notions as “inter-religious consciousness”, “revelation studies”. Not only their expediency have been justified. They are also used directly to elicit philosophical and religious ideas. One of the arguments in favor of these ideas is the necessity to expand terminological lexis, which is insufficient in modern studies. The introduction of new terms with the terms which were had not been used for a long time, has been combined by the author. This is, namely, the aforementioned “religious logics” as well as “divine dialectics”. Due to this combination a kind of symphony of interdependent notions has been formed: they come to function interchangeably with different rate and intensity in (inter)religious communications and interdisciplinary space, proving the existence of “divine dialectics” through their manifestations. From the standpoint of philosophical concept of historical memory, time manifestations on paganism and Christianity as two faith-recognizing systems in Ukraine assert themselves. The prospects for further development of the topic within the context of contemporary spiritual being have been justified by the author at the end of the article.


Berdyaev, N.,1908. Proiskhozhdieniie zla i smysla v istorii [Origin of evil and sense in the history], Vopr. Filos. i Psikhol. [Moskva]. 4 (94), 287–334 (in Russian).

Berdiаiev, N., 1990. Filosofskaia istina i intiellihienskaia pravda [Philosophical and intelligent truth]. Vekhy: сollection of the articles on Russion intelligentsia by Berdiаiev N., Bulhakov S., Hershenzon M., Izhoiev A., Kistiakovsii B., Struve P., Frank S. “Novosti”, Moskva (in Russian).

Bohomolets’, O. V., 2015. Spetsyfika yazyсhnytskoho svitohliadu slovian v konteksti ioho khrystyianskohoi transformacii [Specifics of Slavs Pagan world outlook in the context of its Christian transformation] . Hileia : nauk visnyk : zb. nauk. prac, 99(8), 251–255 (in Ukrainian).

Bulhakov, S., 1914. Transtsendentalnaia probliema religii [Transcendental Problem of Religion]. Vopr. Filos. i Psikhol. [Moskva]. 4 (124), 580–652 (in Russian).

Bulhakov, S., 1914. Transtsendentalnaia probliema religii [Transcendental Problem of Religion]. Vopr. Filos. i Psikhol. [Moskva]. 5 (125), 728–780 (in Russian).

Bulhakov, S., 1915. O tvarnosti [On the Creation]. Vopr. Filos. i Psikholohii. [Moscow]. 4(29), 293 –344 (in Russian).

Verheles, K. M., 2015. Filosofsko-pelihiieznavchyi analiz viry ta ii kryteriiv [Philosophical and Religious analysis of faith and its criterions]. Hileia : nauk visnyk : zb. nauk. prac. 99(8), 255–258 (in Ukrainian).

Zien’kovskii, V., 1917. Zadachi religioznoi psikhologii [The Tasks of Religious Psychology]. Khrist. Mysl’. [Kyiv]. 1, 24–25 (in Russian).

Zien’kovskii, V., 1917. Khristos Voskriesie ! [Christ Has Arisen ! : [appeal to readers]]. Khrist. Mysl’. [Kyiv]. 3, 3–6 (in Russian).

Zien’kovskii, V., 1927. Svoboda i sobornost’ [Freedom and Sovereignty]. Put’ [Paris]. 7, 3–22 (in Russian).

Zien’kovskii, V., 1932. O znaczienii voobrazhienia v dukhovnoi zhizni (Po povodu knihi B. P. Vysheslavtseva “Etika prieobrashiennoho erosa” [On the meaning of imagination in spiritual life (Concerning the subject of the book Ethics of Transformed Eros by B. P. Vysheslavtsev)]. Put’ [Paris]. 32, 90–102 (in Russian).

Zien’kovskii, V., 1938. Zlo v chieloviekie [Evil is inside a man]. Put’ [Paris]. 56, 19–36 (in Russian).

Zien’kovskii, V., 1997. Osnovy khristianskoi filosofii [Fundamentals of Christian Philosophy]. Кanon +, Moskva (in Russian).

Ilarion, Metr., 1992. Dokhrystyianski viruvannia [Pagan Faiths of Ukrainian People: Hist.-Relig. Monogr.]. AT “Oberehy”, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).

Lysyj, I., 2012. Natsionalna filosofia yak problema [National Philosophy as a problem]. Nauk. Zap. NaUKMA. 128, 3 –15 (in Ukrainian).

Lysyj, I., 2014. “Dva nevchasni mirkuvannia” Nitsshe [“Two Wrong time Ideas” by Nietzsche: The Problem of Cultural Identity]. 154, 61–71 (in Ukrainian).

Novyts’kyi, Orest. (1840). Rukovodstvo k opytnoi psikholohii, sostavliennoie Ordinatorskim Professorom Universitieta Sv.Vladimira Oriestom Novickim [Manual of Experimental Psychology by Orest Novitski, Ordinary Prof. of Kyiv Saint Vladimir University]. V Universitietskoi tipohrafii, Kiev (in Russian).

Novyts’kyi, Orest, 1860. Postiepiennoie razvitie drievnikh filosofskikh uchienii v sviazi s razvitiiem yazycheskikh vierovanii [The Gradual Development of Ancient Philosophical Doctrines in connection of Pagan Believes’ development]. Work by Or. Novitski : in 4 parts / [Introduced article of the author without signature at pp. V–XІІ]. V Universitietskoi tipohrafii, Kiev (in Russian).

Ornatskii, F. S., 1888. Vozmozhno li nauchnoie zaniatiie rieligiiei ? (Riech, proizniesionnaia na hodichnom aktie Kiievskoi Dukhovnoi Academii 26 Sientiabria 1888 [Is the Scientific Study of Religion Possible? Speech at the year’s conference of Kiev Spiritual Academy, 26 September 1888)]. Trudy Kiiev Dukhov. Akad. 12, 223–247 (in Russian).

Slipyj, Josyf, 1969. Тwory Kyr Josyfa Werkhownoho Arkhyiepyskopa i Kardynala ; zibraly O. Prof. D-r. Ivan Khoma i Ivan Yatskiv [Writings of Kyr Yosyf, Major Archbishop and Cardinal, collected by Father Ivan Khoma, Father Ivan Jatskiv]. Pope St. Clement Ukrainian Catholic University. Rym, vol. 2 (in Ukrainian).

How to Cite
Timenyk, Z. I. (2016). Ukrainian thinkers on philosophical and religious ideas of revelation and transfiguration: metodological prinsiples. Grani, 19(11), 93-100.