Gender culture of feminism in sociological discourse

  • I. O. Svyatnenko Classical private university
Keywords: feminism, postfeminism, gender culture, gender culture of feminism, patriarchal sexism

Abstract

The definition of the conceptual foundations of feminist gender culture in the sociological discourse has been given in the article. The conclusion has been made that in the feminist discourse, the traditional concepts of the subject and the essence of man are interpreted as common-making as to the essentialist gender theory. Essentialist gender theory supposes the presence of preformical sociogender ideas, through which basic personality dispositions are constructed. Sociogender preformism, if it has subject in gender denotations, allows to understand men and women as different social-gender classes that correspond to the system of gender domination.Such a disposition define both a physiologically-solid components, and mental characteristics and socio-cultural repertoire of men and women’s behavior. Thus, masculinity and femininity get the form of construe constructs and are constitutive for gender culture. In addition, in the context of such approach, the use of socio-systemological approach becomes to be entirely relevant.The popularity essentialist postulates in the interpretation of the gender is combined with the unpopularity of its interpretation towards man as such. Existentialist interpretations in terms of the existence allow to transfer the masculinity into the unreachable sphere, while making the femininity to be only a set of quite predictable and trivial features. In the socio-cultural aspect, it describes the masculine beginning as transcidental and such which forms the vertical towards the cultural system and feminine one being such which forms the horizontal and immanent one with more developed system of binary oppositions (centered movement - female, centripetal movement- male; construction - male, adaptation – female, etc.). The binary model, where differences are placed between the poles of femininity and masculinity, has a strong «defense mechanism» that prevents any attempt to go beyond this rigid design. If we attribute these differences of fundamental nature accenting to «sexual differences» and make them a leading structures of subjectivity, then we surpass all other personal characteristics or we are even limited by it. The demand variety plays on the same trivial opposition of «male» and «female».

References

Aristotel. Metafizika [Metaphysics]. Sobr. soch. 1, 63-369. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian)

Aristotel, 1984. Politika [Policy]. Sobr. soch. 4, 375 -645. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian)

Balabanova, E., 2000. Zavisimost zhenschinyi: teoreticheskie podhodyi k izucheniyu [The dependence of women: theoretical approaches to the study]. Gendernyie issledovaniya 4, 266-277 (in Russian)

Batler, Dzh., 2001. Chisto kulturnoe [The purely cultural]. Vvedenie v gendernyie issledovaniya 2, 289-306. H.; SPb.

(in Russian)

Bezant, A., 1996. Chelovek i ego tela [The man and his bodies]. «Amrita-Ural», 206-216. Magnitogorsk (in Russian)

Bovuar, S. de., 1997. Vtoroy pol [Second gender]. Aleteyya, SPb. (in Russian)

Braydotti, R., 2000. Zhenskie issledovaniya i politiki razlichiya [Women’s studies and differences of policies]. Gendernyie issledovaniya 5, 73-82. (in Russian)

Braydotti, R., 2000. Polovoe razlichie kak politicheskiy proekt nomadizma [Gender difference being the political project of nomadism]. Hrestomatiya feministskih tekstov, 220-251. SPb.: Rech (in Russian)

Vattimo, D. Nasilie – eto to, chto prepyatstvuet zadavat voprosyi [Violence. Does it prevent from asking questions]. Access: http://index.org.ru/infospace/398yatt.html. (in Russian)

Vestkott, M., 2002. Zhenskie issledovaniya kak strategiya izmeneniy: mezhdu krititsizmom i predvideniem [Women’s studies as a change strategy: between criticism and foresight]. Gendernyie issledovaniya 5, 82-85.Vittig M. Pryamoe myishlenie (in Russian)

Goroshko, E., 2001.Gendernaya problematika v yazyikoznanii [Gender issues in linguistics]. Vvedenie v gendernyie issledovaniya 1, 508-543. H.; SPb.: Metadon (in Russian)

Gofman, I., 2001. Gendernyiy displey [The gender display]. Vvedenie v gendernyie issledovaniya. Hrestomatiya 2, 306-335. H.; SPb.: Metadon (in Russian)

Dvorkin, A., 2001. Pornografiya. Muzhchinyi obladayut zhenschinami [Pornography. Men have women]. Vvedenie v gendernyie issledovaniya 2, 201-214. H.; SPb. : Metadon, 2001. (in Russian)

Dmitrieva, M., 2000. Gendernyie issledovaniya v sravnitelnom yazyikoznanii: otsenochnaya leksika kak fragment yazyikovoy kartinyi mira [Gender studies in comparative linguistics: the estimating lexicon being a fragment of the world language picture]. Gendernyie issledovaniya 5, 255-261 (in Russian)

Zherebkin, S., 2000. Pol Razuma: «Yavlyaetsya li Prosveschenie emansipatsionnyim?» [Gender of The Mind, “Is the Enlightenment emancipatorial?”]. Gendernyie issledovaniya 4, 278-289 (in Russian)

Irigarey, L., 2001. Pol, kotoryiy ne edinichen [Gender which is no isolated]. Vvedenie v gendernyie issledovaniya 2, 127-135. H.; SPb.: Metadon (in Russian)

Kaufman, M., 2001. Ot ploti k stali: maskulinnost kak kollektivnaya gallyutsinatsiya [From flesh to steel: masculinity being a collective hallucination]. Gendernaya pedagogika i gendernoe obrazovanie v stranah postsovetskogo prostranstva. Sb. materialov mezhdunar. letney shk. Ivanovo, 20-49. (in Russian)

Kessler-Herris, E., 2000. Zhenskiy trud i sotsialnyiy poryadok [Women’s labor and social order]. Antologiya gendernoy teorii, 171-189. Propilei, Minsk (in Russian)

Kristeva, Yu., 1997. Ot odnoy identichnosti k drugoy [From one identity to another]. Ot Ya k Drugomu. Sb. perevodov po problemam intersub’ektivnosti, kommunikatsii, dialoga. Minsk, (in Russian)

Lakoff, R., 2001. Yazyik i mesto zhenschinyi [The language and the place of women]. Vvedenie v gendernyie issledovaniya 2, 784-798. Metadon, H.; SPb. (in Russian)

Lauretis, T. de., 2001. V zazerkale: zhenschina, kino i yazyik [In the mirror: a woman, film and language]. Vvedenie v gendernyie issledovaniya 2, 738-758. Metadon, H.; SPb. (in Russian)

Lauretis, T. de., 2000. Ritorika nasiliya. Rassmotrenie reprezentatsiy i gendera [The rhetoric of violence. The consideration of representations and gender]. Antologiya tendernoy teorii, 347-373. Propilei (in Russian)

Lober, Dzh., 2000. Printsipyi gendernogo konstruirovaniya [The principles of gender construction]. II Hrestomatiya feministskih tekstov, 187-192. Propilei, SPb. (in Russian)

Markuze, G., 2002. Odnomernyiy chelovek [A one-dimensional man]. Eros i tsivilizatsiya, 251-515. Chero, Moscow

(in Russian)

Mitchell, Dzh., 2001. Zhenskaya seksualnost. Zhak Lakan i école freudiene i [Women’s sexuality. Jacques Lacan and the école freudiene]. Vvedenie v gendernyie issledovaniya 2, 534-560. Metadon, H.; SPb. (in Russian)

Habermas, Yu., 1992. Demokratiya. Razum. Nravstvennost [Democracy. Mind. Moral]. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian)

Cahill, S.E., 1982. Becoming Boys and Girls: Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Sociology, University of California. Santa Barbara, 158 p.

Freeman, J., 1971. The social construction of the second sex. Roles Women Play: Readings towards’ women’s liberation. Belmont, California: Brooks. Cole. 229 p.

Published
2016-10-10
How to Cite
Svyatnenko, I. O. (2016). Gender culture of feminism in sociological discourse. Grani, 19(11), 58-64. https://doi.org/10.15421/1716122
Section
Article