Specifics of horizontal and vertical relations in Ukrainian political communication on the background of the party building’s process, political science theory and requirements to Ukrainian political context
AbstractThe specifics of horizontal and vertical relations in Ukrainian political communication on the background of the party building’s process has been analysed. Aims of this article are: 1) determination of the subjectivity of political communication; 2) disclosure of the main features of internal politics and communications; 3) setting the essential features of the political parties’ status after peaceful protests in Ukraine 2013-2014 year; 4) explanation of the actual gap that has horizontal and party political communication in Ukraine. Political modernization, capacity of Ukrainian political parties has been characterized. It has been shown that Maidan didn’t influenced tools of creating political parties and their typology greatly. Maidan as a political component was weak and did not respond to the challenges, which Ukrainian political system faced to. The weakness was in the fact that leaders of the oppositional political camp would rather keep old then implement real political change of the political system , which was adapted by the old oliharcial clan. Public sector was not able to identify their environment with new political leaders, nor with a mass movement, based on the creation of new organized political force. It has been found that in a democratic society communication is effective only if it is not only technically modern, interactive, two-way, but if it is consistent to other democratic demands, such as legal and moral control of society over the media, maintenance of basic pluralism, direct contact between senders and recipients of information, feeds decentralization, respect of freedom of expression and privat opinion. Summary of the political communication in Ukraine has to move away from thinking of policy and bureaucratic political consciousness. Otherwise, the simulation is effective and efficient for countries and regions where political communication can become a daily political farce communication in public space.
Kolodiy, A. Politychni partiyi Ukrayiny pislya Maydanu [Political parties in Ukraine after the Maidan]. Regime to access: http://political-studies.com/?p=1377 (in Ukrainian)
Morar’, M. V. Politychna komunikatsiya v imidzhmeykerstvi partiynoho lidera [Political Communication in the Image-Making of party leader]. Regime to access: http://nbuv.gov.ua/j-pdf/ gileya_2014_81_82.pdf (in Ukrainian)
Ryabov, S., 2004. Partiya politychna [Political party]. — Kiev, 474-475. (in Ukrainian)
Ostapenko, M., 2012. Politychna komunikatsiya: teoretychni aspekty doslidzhennya [Political communication: theoretical aspects of research]. Politychnyy menedzhment 3, 135-144. (in Ukrainian)
Bell D. Social’nye ramki informacionnogo obshhestva [Social frameworks of the informational society]. Regime to access: http://www.alt-future.narod.ru/Future/bell.htm.
Bykov, I. Setevaja politicheskaja kommunikacija: Teorija, praktika i metody issledovanija [Network of political communication: theory, practice and research tools]. Regime to access: http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20235938 (in Ukrainian)
Vershinin, M. Politicheskie kommunikacii v informacionnom obshhestve: perspektivnye napravlenija issledovanij [Political Communication in the Information Society: perspective directions of research]. Aktual’nye problemy teorii kommunikacij. Sbornik nauchnyh trudov, SPb., 98-107. (in Russian).
Grachev, M. Politika: kommunikacionnoe izmerenie [Politics: communication dimension]. Regime to access: http://grachev62.narod.ru/Grachev/grachev2011_1.html.
Model’ Lassujella [Lasswell Modell]. Regime to access: http://its-journalist.ru/Articles/model._lassue- lla.html.
Morozova, O. Politicheskaja Internet-kommunikacija: ee rol’, funkcii i formy [Internet communication: role, functions and forms]. Regime to access: http://cyberleninka.rU/article/n/politicheskaya-internet-kommunikatsiya-ee-rol-funktsii-i-formy.
Politicheskaja kommunikacija i SMI. Politologija [Political Communication and Media. Political science]. Regime to access: http://www.twirpx.com/file/642895/.
Politicheskie kommunikacii, 2004 [Political communications]. Moscow, 332 (in Russian).
Pochepcov, G. Teorija kommunikacii [Theory of Communication]. Regime to access: http://polbu.ru/pochepcov_communications/.
Toffler Je. Tret’ja volna [Тhird wave]. Regime to access: http://www.twirpx.com/file/384195/.
Shvarcenberg, R.-Zh., 1992. Politicheskaja sociologija: V 3 ch. [Political Sociology]. Moscow, 180. (in Russian).
Carey, J. W. A., 1989. Cultural Approach to Communication [Communication as culture: Essays on media and society]. New York, 185. (in English)
Deutsch, K. W., 1963. The Nerves of Government: Models of Political Communication and Control [The Nerves of Government: Models of Political Communication and Contro]. London, 316. (in English)
Pye, L., 1987. Political Communication [The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Institutions. Term - Political Communication ]. Oxford – New York, 442. (in English)
Sinne K., 1975. Communication: Mass Political Behavior [Communication: Mass Political Behavior]. Beverly Hills, 319. (in English)