Public sphere of politics: between classical grounds and new political actuality


  • O. A. Tretyak Oles Honchar Dnepropetrovsk national university
Keywords: the public sphere politics, political communication, civil society, power relations, open society, liberal freedoms

Abstract

The public sphere of politics as a theoretical concept of modern political science has been discussed in the article. The reasons of the increasing interest to the public sphere is a dominating subject. Studied The phenomenon of the public sphere being a tool of theoretical and methodological definition of the political world’s boundaries has been studied. The value aspects of media activity in the contemporary politics has been investigated. An attempt has been made to establish the potential of political publicity for the qualitative understanding of participatory democracy. The potential of the public sphere in the development of civil society and social capital has been described. The distinction between the public sphere of politics and political communication in the specific conditions of modern transformational societies has been reasonably grounded. The importance of the presence of state power in all spheres of life of the transformational society has been stressed. Such transformation has not been stoped after the liberal market reforms, which had to ensure the existence of a formal representative democracy. The influence of the elite and expert groups being the reason of the absence of really functioning future civil society has been considered. The features of the formation of civil and social activities as a precondition for the democratic political class’ functioning have been studied. The specifics of public political activity being the prerogative of the competent entities’ political broadcasting have been analyzed. The gradual formation of cyber public sphere and its political branch segment has been revealed. Thorough attention has been given to the processes of the public sphere’s politicization which are usual for primarily authoritarian and closed societies.

References

1. Benson, R. 2001. The Mediated Public Sphere: A Model for Cross-National Research. Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics University of California, Berkeley Working Paper Series. Retrieved from URL: http://www.irle.berkeley.edu/culture/papers/Benson01_08.pdf. (in English)
2. Dahlgren, P. 1995. Television and the Public Sphere : Citizenship, Democracy and the Media. Media Culture & Society Series. SAGE Publications Ltd. 192 p. (in English)
3. Druckman, J. N. Leeper, T. J. 2012. Learning More from Political Communication Experiments: Pretreatment and Its Effects. American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 56. # 4. October. 875–896. (in English)
4. Dryzek, J. S. 2010. Rhetoric in Democracy: A Systemic Appreciation Source Political Theory. Vol. 38. # 3 (June). 319 – 339. (in English)
5. Dryzek, J. S. 2005. Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies: Alternatives to Agonism and Analgesia. Political Theory. Vol. 33. # 2. 218 – 242. (in English)
6. Dryzek, J. S. 2003. Social Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy: A Reconciliation and Christian List British Journal of Political Science. Vol. 33. # 1. 1 – 28. (in English)
7. Fuchs, C. 2014. Social Media and the Public Sphere Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society triple C 12 (1): Vol. 12. # 1. 57–101. (in English)
8. Gaber, I. 2007. Too much of a good thing: the ‘problem’ of political communications in a mass media democracy. Journal of Public Affairs J. Public Affairs # 7: 219–234. (in English)
9. Habermas, J. 2004. ‘Public Space and Political Public Space – the Biographical Roots of Two Motifs in My Thoughts’, Kyoto Prize Speech, Kyoto, 11 November, Retrieved from URL: http://homepage.mac.com/gedavis/JH/Kyoto_lecture_Nov_2004.pdf. (in English)
10. Hummel, P. 2012. Deliberative democracy and electoral competition //Games and Economic Behavior. # 75. 646–667. (in English)
11. König P. D., Wenzelburger G. 2014. Toward a Theory of Political Strategy in Policy Analysis Politics & Policy. Volume 42. # 3 400 – 430. (in English)
12. McGuigan, J. 2005. The Cultural Public Sphere European Journal of Cultural Studies November vol. 8 # 4. 427 – 443. (in English)
13. McKee, A. 2005. The Public Sphere: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 280 р. (in English)
14. Nabatchi, T. 2010. Addressing the Citizenship and Democratic Deficits: The Potential of Deliberative Democracy for Public Administration The American Review of Public Administration #40 (4). 376 –399. (in English)
15. Selen, E. A. 2013. Hendriks Carolyn M.The democratic challenges and potential of localism: insights from deliberative democracy Policy Studies Vol. 34 #. 4. 422 – 440. (in English)
Published
2016-10-20
How to Cite
Tretyak, O. (2016). Public sphere of politics: between classical grounds and new political actuality. Grani, 19(11), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.15421/1716114
Section
Статті