Religious factors of social modernization/alternative modernization of orthodoxy in the context of M.Weber’s theory


  • Y. Y. Medviedieva National aviation university
Keywords: modernization, alternative modernization, Orthodoxy, charisma, charismatic domination, the traditional dominance

Abstract

The article deals with the definition of religious factors modernization / alternative modernization Orthodoxy in the context of the theory of Max Weber, as well as defining features of the relationship between the state and the Orthodox Church in the context of the relations of domination Weber types of rationality and social action. The author in the context of the use of the conceptual apparatus of the theory of Max Weber concluded that the result of clashes and compromises between the religious ethic of ascetic and mystical mood of monasticism with the apparatus of state violence became associated with the position of religion in relation to the «world» practice of social escapism. Christianity, according to the researcher, provides the legitimacy of traditional authority, which uses a charismatic, as the Orthodox Church confirms its divine origin, even in the absence of policy charismatic qualities, due to which there is a profanation of charisma. Therefore, all politicians, from the time of the Byzantine Empire in the communist and today’s post-communist politicians, not only did not go to the elimination of the Church as a political force and as the ideology of the center, and converted the church into one of the feudal corporations and obedient ally in the implementation of political security functions in relation to society and increase the prestige of the regime and the state as a whole.

References

1. Veber, M., 1906. Istorychnyy narys vyzvol’noho rukhu v Rosiyi i polozhennya burzhuaznoyi demokratiyi [Historical background of the liberation movement in provisions and bourgeois democracy]. SPb. (in Ukrainian)
2. Veber, M., 1990. Krytychni doslidzhennya v haluzi nauk pro kul’turu [Critical research in the sciences of culture]. Vybrani tvory, 416-494. Prohres, Moscow (in Ukrainian)
3. Veber, M., 1997. Osnovni ponyattya stratyfikatsiyi [Concepts stratification]. Kravchenko, A.I. Sotsiolohiya Maksa Vebera: pratsya ta ekonomika [Max Weber’s Sociology: work and economics]. Moscow (in Ukrainian)
4. Veber, M., 1980. Osnovni sotsiolohichni ponyattya [The basic sociological concepts]. Doslidzhennya z metodolohiyi nauky 1, 370-411. Nauka, Moscow (in Ukrainian)
5. Veber, M., 1990. Protestant·s’ki sekty i dukh kapitalizmu [Protestant sects and the Spirit of Capitalism]. Vybrani tvory, 273-306. Prohres, Moscow (in Ukrainian)
6. Veber, M., 1990. Protestant·s’ka etyka i dukh kapitalizmu [The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism]. Vybrani tvory, 61-344. Prohres, Moscow (in Ukrainian)
7. Veber, M., 1994. Sotsiolohiya relihiyi (typy relihiynykh spivtovarystv) [Sociology of Religion (types of religious communities)]. Vybrane. Obraz suspil’stva, 78-308. Yuryst, Moscow (in Ukrainian)
8. Veber, M., 1994. Teoriya stupeniv i napryamiv relihiynoho nepryynyattya svitu [The theory of levels and trends of religious rejection of the world]. Vybrane. Obraz tovarystva, 7-42. Yuryst, Moscow (in Ukrainian)
9. Veber, M., 1988. Kharyzmatychne panuvannya [Charismatic domination]. Sotsys 5, 139-147 (in Ukrainian)
10. Veber, M., 1991. Hospodars’ka etyka svitovykh relihiy [The economic ethic of world religions]. Roboty po sotsiolohiyi, relihiyi i kul’turi, 43-77.Prohres, Moscow (in Ukrainian)
11. Davydov, Yu.N., 1986. «Veberivs’kyy renesans» i problema «doslidnyts’koyi prohramy» Maksa Vebera [«Weber renaissance» and the problem of «research program»]. Burzhuazna sotsiolohiya pid kinets’ XX stolittya: Krytyka novitnikh tendentsiy, 92-121. Nauka, Moscow (in Ukrainian)
12. Davydov, Yu.N., 1998. Maks Veber i suchasna teoretychna sotsiolohiya: Aktual’ni problemy veberivskoho sotsiolohichnoho vchennya [Max Weber and contemporary theoretical sociology: Current Affairs veberivskoho sociological theory]. Martis, Moscow (in Ukrainian)
13. Romanenko, Yu.V., 2006. Sensoprodukuvannya v sotsial’nykh systemakh: Monohrafiya [Sensoprodukuvannya social systems: Monograph]. Vyd-vo «E ta E», Kyiv (in Ukrainian)
14. Synelina, Yu. Yu., 2009. Kontseptsiyi sekulyaryzatsiyi v sotsiolohichniy teoriyi. Teoretychni aspekty vyvchennya relihiynosti naselennya v sotsiolohiyi relihiyi [Concept of secularization in sociological theory. The theoretical aspects of the study of religious people in the sociology of religion]. VAT RITs ISPI RAN, Moscow (in Ukrainian)
15. Toshchenko, Zh.T., 2007. Derzhava yak sub»yekt teokratiyi [The state as a subject of theocracy]. Sotsis 2, 3-14. (in Ukrainian)
16. Toshchenko, Zh.T., 2007. Teokratiya: fantom chy real’nist’? [Theocracy: phantom or reality?]. Akademiya, Moscow (in Ukrainian)
17. Tyahar abo blahoslovennya? Pravoslav»ya Rosiyi ta pobudova hromadyans’koho suspil’stva i demokratiyi [Burden or blessing? Orthodox Russia and building civil society and democracy]. 2004. Bostons’kyy universytet, Instytut kul’tury, relihiyi ta mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn, 37-44. Boston (in Ukrainian)
Published
2016-09-09
How to Cite
Medviedieva, Y. (2016). Religious factors of social modernization/alternative modernization of orthodoxy in the context of M.Weber’s theory. Grani, 19(9), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.15421/171677
Section
SOCIOLOGY