Detsyzionizm as a socio-philosophical version of proto fascist dictatorship and сontroversies normativism (K. Schmitt - G. Kelzen)


  • Y. V. Rahmaylov Zhytomyr Ivan Franko state university, Zhytomyr
Keywords: dezisionizm, normativizm, conservatism, fascism, potestaryzm, legal positivism, political theology

Abstract

State sovereignty creates and guarantees the situation in its totality, with its monopoly of the last decision. This is, according to Schmitt, the essence of state sovereignty, which is thus legally should properly be determined not as overbearing monopoly or monopoly of coercion, but the monopoly of decision-making, despite the fact that the word solution is used in a general sense to be solved more . Exceptional case reveals more clearly the nature of state authority for everything. This solution is separated from law and authority proves that he to create right, no need to be eligible. Schmitt criticized Kelzena solving problem concept of sovereignty that denies it. With normativism Kelzena conclude that the notion of sovereignty must radically refuse. In fact, according to the author, this is an old liberal denial of the state, as opposed to ignoring the law and the right as a separate issue. Speaking supporter of «conservative revolution» or «counter-revolution» that restores the primacy of national identity and promotes the return of social, political, and spiritual values by zaktsentovuye focus on identifying the essential characteristics of conservatism that allows to associate it with a specific set of tenets and philosophical principles of fascism. Therefore, meaningful approach to understanding conservatism in Schmitt, we believe more accurately reflects the nature of this ideological trend and offers the prospect of studying the relationship between conservatism and fascism as a social project

Author Biography

Y. V. Rahmaylov, Zhytomyr Ivan Franko state university, Zhytomyr
postgraduate

References

1. Dugin, A. Karl Shmitt: 5 urokov dlja Rossii (5 studies for Russia). (Arktogeja .filosofskij portal) Arktogeja. Regime to access: http://www.arcto.ru/modules.php?name:=News&flle=art^c]e&sid=23.
2. Lobkovic, N. Karl Shmitt katolicheskij fashist? (Karl Shmitt as catholical fascist) Voprosy filosofii, 2001, vol. 5, рр 85-93.
3. Maler, A. K. Shmitt «Politicheskaja teologija» Jelektronnyj resurs. Oficial’nyj sajt Filosofskoj gazety. M., 2000. Regime to access: http://www.phg.m/issuel/fg-13.html.
4. Muff, Sh. Karl Shmitt i paradoks liberal’noj demokratii (Karl Shmitt and paradoxe of liberal democracy). Logos, 2004, vol.6 (45), рр. 140-153.
5. Remizov, M. Vvedenie v jepistemologiju konservatizma (Introduction to conservative epistemology). Russkij Zhurnal: ezhednevnoe setevoe izdanie. M., 2003, 17 janvarja. Regime to access: http://www.russ.ru.
6. Rormozer, G. Karl Shmitt: konservatizm vmesto pravoj idei (Karl Shmitt: conservatism instead right idea) . Novyj konservatizm: vyzov dlja Rossii. RAN. In-t filosofii. Moscwa, IF RAN, 1996. 237 р., рр. 144-156.
7. Filippov, A. Karl Shmitt. Rascvet i katastrofa (Karl Shmitt: sunrise and fiasco). Moscwa, 2000., pp. 259-314.
8. Shmitt, K. Glossarij: zametki 1947-1951 g (Glossa: notice to 1947-1951). Referativnyj zhurnal. Social’nye i gumanitarnye nauki, 1998, vol. 1.
9. Shmitt, K. Duhovno-istoricheskoe sostojanie sovremennogo parlamentarizma (Spiritual-historical situation of modern parlamentarismus). M.: Izd-vo: KANON-press-C, 2000, 336 p, pp. 157-256; 53-57.
10. Shmitt, K. Diktatura. Ot istokov sovremennoj idei suvereniteta do proletarskoj klassovoj bor’by (Dictatorship. That’s origins Modern Ideas sovereignty to proletarian klass- struggle). SPb., 2005.
11. Bckenfrde, E.-W. Der Begriff des Politischen als Schlssel zum staatrechtlichen Werk Carl Schmitts // Complexio Oppositorum. ber Carl Schmitt / hrsg. H. Quaritsch. Berlin, 1988.
12. Forsthoff , E. Der Staat der Industriegesellschaft. Dargestellt am Beispiel der Bundesrepublik. Mnchen, 1971.
13. Forsthoff , E. Der totale Staat. Hamburg, 1933.
14. Eichhorn M. Carl Schmitts Verstndnis des Staates als einer geschichtlichen Gre / hrsg. von R. Voight // IFS-Nachrichten. 1998. № 9.
15. Hofmann, H. Legitimitt gegen Legalitt. Der Weg der politischen Philosophie Carl Schmitts. Berlin, 1992. Lbbe H. Politische Theologie als Theologie repolitisierter Religion // Hochland. 1924.vol. 21.
16. Meier, H. Die Lehre Carl Schmitts. Vier Kapitel zur Unterscheidung Politischer Theologie und Politischer Philosophie. Stuttgart, 1994.
Published
2014-07-04
How to Cite
Rahmaylov, Y. (2014). Detsyzionizm as a socio-philosophical version of proto fascist dictatorship and сontroversies normativism (K. Schmitt - G. Kelzen). Grani, 17(10), 33-38. Retrieved from https://grani.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/686
Section
PHILOSOPHY