The noohumanistic worldview as the problem of the modern philosophy of education

  • R. B. Shindaulova Kurmangazy Kazakh national conservatory
Keywords: philosophy of education, noohumanism, noohumanistic worldview, educational activity, humanistic approach, personal approach

Abstract

The problem of innovation in the context of Intellectual Property becomes actual as the society’s developmIn the article, the author studies the problem of forming noohumanistic worldview based of the noohumanism and the pedagogical potential of latest research. The noohumanism with its moral and humanistic oriented, demand time and in the context of contemporary realities can become a spiritual compass of modern youth. One way to study noogumanism pedagogical potential is feasible on the basis of a comparative analysis with similar types of educational systems. The philosophy of cooperation requires the implementation of appropriate humanitarian settings: understanding and acceptance of the child as he or she is; empathy (empathy), dialogue. The universality of dialogue is that it is not just a semantic nucleus of culture, but also its logical form, because the consciousness of others can not contemplate, it is possible to understand and analyze the means of communication. As a result of analysis of the problem, the author found that the formation of noohumanistic worldview includes the main provisions of these types of systems and didactic concepts of the philosophy of education. Author comes to conclusion that the noohumanistic philosophy of education has a great humanist, developmental potential and associative capabilities. Conjugated with personality-activity approach, the formation noohumanistic worldview contains full features of educational activity, representing theoretical justification of their educational potential.

References

Andrushchenko, V.P., 2011. Svitanok Yevropy: Problema formuvannya novoho uchytelya dlya ob’yednanoyi Yevropy ХХI stolittya [Dawn Europe: Shaping a new teacher for a united Europe of the XXI century]. Znannya Ukrayiny, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).

Bazaluk, O.A., 2015. Sovremennoe ponimanie filosofii obrazovaniya [Current understanding of the philosophy of education]. Filosofskaya myisl 4, 248-271. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2015.4.15321. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_15321.html (in Russian).

Bazaluk, O.A., 2016. Filosofiya kosmosa: mesto cheloveka v masshtabah Zemli i kosmosa. Glava pervaya [Philosophy of space: the place of man in the scale of the Earth and the cosmos. Chapter first]. Philosophy and Cosmology 16, 28-42. ISPC, Kyiv (in Russian).

Berns, R., 1986. Razvitie Ya-kontseptsii i vospitanie [The development of self-concept and training]. Progress, Moscow (in Russian).

Bolshoy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar [Great Encyclopedic Dictionary]. 1991. Sov. entsiklopediya 1. Moscow (in Russian).

Bordovskaya, N.V., 2000. Pedagogika. Uchebnik dlya vuzov [Pedagogy. Textbook for high schools]. Izd. «Piter», SPb (in Russian).

Vashkevych, V.M., 2010. Istorychna svidomist’ student·s’koyi molodi: tsinnisno-svitohlyadni oriyentyry [Historical consciousness of students, values ​​and ideological orientations]. Svitohlyad, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).

Voronkova, V. G., 2012. Formirovanie novogo mirovozzreniya, novogo cheloveka, novogo obschestva buduschego [Formation of a new world, a new man, a new society of the future]. Future Human Image 2, 134-152. ISPC, Kyiv (in Russian).

Voronkova, V. H., 2016. Formuvannya kontseptsiyi noosfernoho rozvytku suchasnoho sotsiumu: teoretyko-metodolohichnyy kontekst [Concept noosphere formation of modern society: theoretical and methodological context]. Philosophy and Cosmology 16, 179-189. ISPC, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).

Zimnyaya, I.A., 2000. Pedagogicheskaya psihologiya. Uchebnik dlya vuzov [Pedagogical psychology]. Logos, Moscow (in Russian).

Ivanov, S.A, Voroshilova, T.A., 2010. Sovremennoe ekologicheskoe obrazovanie: ot ekotsentrizma k noosfernomu mirovozzreniyu [Modern environmental education: from ecocentrism to noospheric outlook]. Obrazovanie i nauka 8 (76), 53-64 (in Russian).

Novikov, A.M., 2007. Metodologiya [Methodology]. SIN-TEG, Moscow (in Russian).

Pedagogika [Pedagogy]. 2000. Shkola- Press, Moscow (in Russian).

Podlasyiy, I.P., 2003. Pedagogika: Novyiy kurs: Ucheb. dlya stud. vyissh. ucheb. zavedeniy [Psychology: The New Deal: Proc. for students. Executive. Proc. institutions]. VLADOS 1. Moscow (in Russian).

Rodzhers, K., 1994. Vzglyad na psihoterapiyu. Stanovlenie cheloveka [A look at psychotherapy. Human Formation]. Progress, Moscow (in Russian).

Rubinshteyn, S.L., 1989. Osnovyi obschey psihologii [Fundamentals of general psychology].Pedagogika 1. Moscow (in Russian).

Orlov, A.B., 1988. Perspektivyi gumanizatsii obucheniya [Prospects of a humanisation of teaching]. Voprosyi psihologii 6, 142-146 (in Russian).

Bazaluk, Oleg, 2014.. Neurophilosophy in the Formation of Planetary-Cosmic Personality. Future Human Image 1 (4), 5-13. ISPC, Kyiv.

Svyrydenko, D., 2015. Globalization as a factor of academic mobility processes expanding. Philosophy and Cosmology 14, 223-235. ISPC, Kyiv.

Svyrydenko, D., 2014. Higher education in the face of XXI century challenges. Philosophy and Cosmology 12, 258-263. ISPC, Kyiv.

Published
2016-06-14
How to Cite
Shindaulova, R. B. (2016). The noohumanistic worldview as the problem of the modern philosophy of education. Grani, 19(8), 40-44. https://doi.org/10.15421/171650
Section
Article