The ways of decision of language question of modern Ukraine on condition of the «Russian factor»


  • D. P. Krasnoseletskiy Khmelnytsky humanitarian and pedagogical academy
Keywords: official language, Ukrainian language, language question, «Russian factor»

Abstract

In the article research of language question is reflected in Ukraine on the modern stage. From the first years of independence Ukrainian language proclaimed state with corresponding normatively-legal soil. However, requirements of lawful legislation quite often disregard. Local authorities in east and south regions allowed language processes on a drift, that resulted in deepening a language, and after him and political «dissidence» in Ukraine. A situation became sharp interference with the matter of the political elite of Russia, interested in liquidation of sovereignty of former «prisoner». In the conditions of anti-terror operation, it is extremely important to decide of correct an open of the language question, of that try are offered in the article. Sociological and political science researches, positions of politicians, lawyers, historians, linguists, are analysed for this purpose. It is stated herein that Ukrainian language must remain an only official language. Maintenance of integrity of Ukraine is possible only at such condition. Besides at that rate possible consolidation of Ukrainian society that in force of informative opposition between Russia and Ukraine found oneself on verge of social dissidence». Composition and quantity of population of our state depend on it.

Author Biography

D. P. Krasnoseletskiy, Khmelnytsky humanitarian and pedagogical academy
PhD in history, associate professor

References

1. Bogomolec О. Mova – ce pupovyna, iyka pryvyazuye lyudinu do zemli likar (A language is an umbilical that attaches a man to earth). A newspaper is for Ukrainian. 2014. 04 bereznya. Regime to access: http://gazeta.ua/articles/sogodennya/_mova-ce-pupovina-yaka-privyazuye-lyudinu-do-zemli-likar-olga-bogomolec/545479
2. Bryukhovecykiy V. Apologiya «Uzkoyazychnostiy» (Apologia of narrow-language). Ukrainskyiy tyzhden. 2014. no 19(339). pp. 14.
3. Vasylenko V. Kompromisna postupka chy zamah na konstytuciynyiy lad (A compromise concession or encroaching is upon a constitutional line-up). Ukrainskyiy tyzhden. 2014. no 19(339). pp. 22-25.
4. Vyshnyak О. Movna sytuacia ta status mov v Ukraini: dynamika, problemy, perspektyvy (sociologichnyiy analiz) (Language situation and status of languages in Ukraine: dynamics, problems, prospects (sociological analysis)). К.: Instytut sociologii NAN Ukrainy, 2009, 176 p.
5. Kramar О. Mif pro rosiiyskomovni regiony (A myth is about the Russian-language regions).Ukrainskyiy tyzhden. 2014. no 19(339). pp. 26-29.
6. Losev I. Ukrainizaciya: zhahalka chy kategorychnyiy imperatyv? (Ukrainethetion: fright or categorical imperative?). Ukrainskyiy tyzhden. 2014. no 19(339). pp. 30-32.
7. Moskalyuk О. Druga derzhavna mova v Ukraini: mify ta realnist (Second official language in Ukraine: myths and reality). 10.06.2014. Regime to access: http://tsn.ua/blogi/themes/law/druga-derzhavna-mova-v-ukrayini-mifi-ta-realnist-353878.html
8. Panina N. Ukrainske suspilstvo 1992-2008: sociologichnyiy monitoryng (Ukrainian society of 1992 - 2008: sociological monitoring). К.: Instytut sociologii NAN Ukrainy, 2008, 85 p.
9. Panchenko V. Statusni igry (Status games). Ukrainsykyi tyzhden. 2014. no 19(339). pp. 16-17.
10. Petrov D. Glyadya iz Kieva: krizis kak ocherednoyi pasyans (Looking from Kyiv: crisis as next solitaire). 17.04.2007. Regime to access: http://www.prognosis.ru/archive/nt.html
11. Polishuk V. Ukraincev pomirit surzhyk (A maslin is reconciled Ukrainians). Rabochaya gazeta, 2014, 1 aprelya, p. 4.
12. Poroshenko P. Ya idu v Prezidenty, chtoby sohranit I ukrepit edinstvo Ukrainy : Press-sluzhba Presidenta Ukrainy (I go to Presidents, to save and fix unity of Ukraine). 07.06.2014. Regime to access: http://www.president.gov.ua/ru/news/30490.html
13. Tolochko P. Cho abo hto zagrozhue ukrainskiyi movi? (That or who does threaten to Ukrainian?). К.: «Oriainy», 1998, 32 p.
14. Taygnybok O. Edyna derzhavna mova – ce aksioma, yaka ne mozhe buty predmetom politychnyh torgiv (An only official language is an axiom that can not be the article of political tenders). 27.04.2014. Regime to access: http://www.svoboda.org.ua/diyalnist/komentari/049964/
15. Hmelko V. Iz-za chego politikam udaetsya raskalyvat Ukrainu (From what politicians succeed to break Ukraine). Zerkalo nedeli, 2006, 23 iyunya. Regime to access: http://gazeta.zn.ua/ARCHIVE/iz-za_chego_politikam_udaetsya_raskalyvat_ukrainu.html
16. Shyshkin V. Pravo I mova. Derzhavna mova yak skladnyk derzhavotvorennya (Right and language. Official language as constituent of creation of the state).Ukrainsykyi tyzhden. 2014. no 19(339). pp. 18-20.
Published
2014-08-26
How to Cite
Krasnoseletskiy, D. (2014). The ways of decision of language question of modern Ukraine on condition of the «Russian factor». Grani, 17(9), 107-112. Retrieved from https://grani.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/645
Section
POLITICAL SCIENCE