Biological and social understanding of human nature: biopolitical dimension

  • S. K. Kostiuchkov Kherson state university
Keywords: biopolitics, biosocial nature, coevolution, biocentrism, bioethics, biotechnology, population, bios, kulturhen

Abstract

This paper examines the position of the biopolitical nature of man as a biosocial being given supplies of both the two spheres of life – natural, biological and social. The necessity of understanding of human nature, which by definition are bio-social importance of the approach to the definition of man as an integral, binary-konnotovanoyi of the «social individual – a species» which is characterized by symmetrical opposition – upposition social and biological. It was found that the main task of modern political science, and in particular bio-political studies presented appeals to rethink the political picture of the world in order to predict the development of a new order or a new chaos. Understanding the formation of a new global civilization worldview is today one of the most important problems, which is connected with the main problem of the modern world – the task of preserving life on the planet. It is concluded that the contradictions of human nature – between the biological and the social, physical and spiritual, universal and the particular, natural and artificial, rational and emotional – in today’s conditions are extremely sharp. The said situation requires more in-depth scientific analysis of human nature, the study of the structural level as human biosocial system.

Author Biography

S. K. Kostiuchkov, Kherson state university
PhD in political science, associate professor

References

Averbah I. L. Ot prestupleniya k trudu (From crime to work). Moscow, 1936, 223 p.

Agamben Dzh. Homo sacer. Suverennaya vlast i golaya zhizn (Homo sacer. Sovereign power and bare life). Moscow, 2011, 256 p.

Gertsenzon A. A. Borba s prestupnostyu v RSFSR: Po materialam obsledovaniya NK RKI SSSR (Fighting crime in the RSFSR: According to the survey NC RCTs USSR). Moscow, 1928, 162 p.

GULAG: Glavnoe upravlenie lagerey.1918-1960 (Gulag: Headquarter camps.1918-1960).Moscow,2000,888p.

Istoriya stalinskogo GULAGa. Konets 1920-h – pervaya polovina 1950-h godov. Sobranie dokumentov v 7 tomah. (History of Stalin’s Gulag. Late 1920s - first half of the 1950s. Collection of documents in 7 volumes.). Moscow, 2004.

Kavtaradze D. N., Ovsyannikov A. A., Oleskin A. V. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskie i pravovyie osnovyi sohraneniya bioraznoobraziya (Socio-economic and legal framework for biodiversity conservation). Moscow, 2002, 420 p. Regime to access: http://www.nature.air.ru/biodiversity/book4_2.html.

Kostyuchkov S.K. Strukturno-funkcional`ni osobly`vosti sy`stemy` mizhnarodny`x vidnosy`n u pershij dekadi XXI stolittya (Structural and functional features of the system of international relations in the first decade of the XXI century). Naukovi praci MAUP, 2014. no 2 (41), pp. 39-44.

Kuli Ch. K. Chelovecheskaya priroda i sotsialnyiy poryadok (Human nature and the social order). Moscow, 2000, 320 p. Regime to access: http://royallib.ru/book/kuli_charlz/chelovecheskaya_priroda_i_sotsialniy_poryadok.html

Lamsden Ch., Gurshurst A. Genno-kulturnaya koevolyutsiya: chelovecheskiy rod v stanovlenii (Genetic and cultural co-evolution: the human race in the formation of). Chelovek, 1991, no3, рp. 11-22.

Oleskin A. V. Biopolitika. Politicheskiy potentsial sovremennoy biologii: filosofskie, politologicheskie i prakticheskie aspek (Biopolitics. Political potential of modern biology: philosophical, political science and practical aspects). Moscow, 2001, 432 р. Regime to access: http://biopolitika.ucoz.ru/index/0-5.

Ot tyurem k vospitatelnyim uchrezhdeniyam. Sbornik statey (From Prison to educational institutions. Collection of articles). Moscow, 1934, 452 р.

Solzhenitsyin A. Arhipelag GULAG (The Gulag Archipelago). Moscow, 1991, 432 р.

Fukuyama F. Nashe postchelovecheskoe buduschee: Posledstviya biotehnologicheskoy revolyutsii (Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution). Moscow, 2004, 349 р. Regime to access: http://alt-future.narod.ru/Future/Fnpb/fukunpb.htm

Hoffe O. Tragen die Wissenschaften eine Verantwortung fur unsere Zivilisation? Zukunftseithik und Industriege sellschaft (Hrsg.von Meyer Th., Grebing H.). Munchen, 1986. P.77.

Published
2014-07-29
How to Cite
Kostiuchkov, S. K. (2014). Biological and social understanding of human nature: biopolitical dimension. Grani, 17(9), 72-76. Retrieved from https://grani.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/639
Section
POLITICAL SCIENCE