Civil solidarity as a behavioral strategy of civil dialogue

  • S. L. Ghorodecjka Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Keywords: civil society, civil dialogue, civil solidarity, solidarity, civil society organizations, national identity, trust, values


Civil society is built by using the standard of citizenship around which  people localized. The building instrument of it is civil solidarity as the main condition of society for the consolidation and unification. Civil society is formed and operated by the requirement of compliance with applicable standards and inclusion in social relations. And on this basis happens the identification and association of these relations.In this article the author examines the concept of social solidarity as a behavioral strategy of civil dialogue, which is the means of realizing the interests of citizens and their way of expression through meaningful selecting of social associations and identifying themselves with it. Civil dialogue is largely dependent on the social solidarity, on the culture development of dialogue interaction between society and the state, and of course, of the law and legal procedures consolidation of bilateral interaction authorities and civil society. On the one hand, the demand for interactive communication in society is determined by the degree of civil solidarity development of the population, on the other hand,  this solidarity awakening only in the full and equal civil society dialogue with the government, which, by the way, today we lack for the establishment of a vibrant civil society in contemporary Ukraine.The problem of social solidarity in the «post­Soviet» Ukraine is generated by the need to replace entrenched consciousness of the citizens «Soviet» concepts and values in modern Ukrainian identity factors and integration.

Author Biography

S. L. Ghorodecjka, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv


Danyliv, V.Yu. Solidarnist I solidarism (Solidarity and solidarism). K.: «KM Academia»,2000. 152 p.

Durkheim, E. O razdelenii obshestvennogo truda.( The division of labour in society). М.: Каnon, 1996. 432 p.

Parsons, T. Systema sovremennih obshestv (The system of modern societies). Aspect Press, 1997. 270 p.

Truevtseva, S.S. Traktovka konsensusa u O.Konta. (O.Kont interpretation of consensus). Social research. 1994. no 11. pp.139­141.

Tonnies, F. Spilnota ta suspilstvo. (Сommunity and society). K.:Duh I literatura, 2005. 262 p.

Habermas, U. Moralnoe soznanie I komunicativnoe deistvie. (Moral consciousness and communicative action). Spb.:Nauka, 2000. 384 p.

Ukrainske suspilstvo.Dvadtsat rokiv nezalezhnosti.Sotsiologichniy monitoring u 2­h tomah.( Ukrainian society. Twenty years of independence. Social monitoring: in 2 volumes). Volume 2. K.: Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2011. 480 p.

Alexander, J.C. The Civil Sphere. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. 816 p.

Blumer, H. Symbolic Interactionism. Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969. 167 p.

Schutz, A. The Problem of Social Reality. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1962. 360 p.

Sorokin P.A. Society, culture, and personality :Their structure and dynamics: A system of general sociology.­N.Y.: Harper & bros,1947.

How to Cite
Ghorodecjka, S. L. (2014). Civil solidarity as a behavioral strategy of civil dialogue. Scientific and Theoretical Almanac Grani, 17(8), 80-84. Retrieved from