Philosophia ad bellum


  • Yu. O. Loboda Institute of Philosophy them. GS Pans NAS of Ukraine
Keywords: war, strategy, logic, theory of cognition, intelligence, victory, defeat

Abstract

In the paper «Philosophia ad bellum» is being realized an attempt to classify philosophic approaches to the study of phenomenon of war by the analogy with the structure of «Just war theory» – 1. Philosophia ad bellum – «philosophy for war», where are investigated ways of using of philosophic methods of cognition in applied military sciences; 2. Philosophia supra bello – «philosophy above war», which investigates world­view, historic­philosophic, existential, logic­epistemological aspects of war; 3. Philosophia contra belli – «philosophy against war», where research of the essence of war gets its logical conclusion in grounding of the absurdity of thinking schemes which justify war as an act of violence. In the article was made historic­philosophic overview of the part «Philosophia ad bellum», where were showed tangent questions, which are considered by philosophic logic and theory of strategic intelligence. It was stated, that specialists if military intelligence admit the important role of researches in logic and theory of cognition in their professional work; were defined basic questions, which have the most essential interest for military professionals. There were analyzed ways of using of philosophic methods in developing military strategies, was made a conclusion that philosophy can be a basis of strategic failures and victories as well.

Author Biography

Yu. O. Loboda, Institute of Philosophy them. GS Pans NAS of Ukraine
doctoral

References

1. Diogen Laertskiy. O zhizni, ucheniyah i izrecheniyah znamenityih filosofov (). Moskva: Myisl, 1986. 571 р.
2. Lure S.Ya. Demokrit (). Leningrad: Nauka, 1970. 664 р.
3. Onisandra nastavleniya voenachalnikam, perevedennyiya s Grecheskago, i izdannyiya s Grecheskim tekstom, primechaniyami i tablitsami baronom Fedorom Stuartom (). Sanktpeterburg: v tipografii departamenta narodnago prosvescheniya, 1828. 200 р.
4. Plett V. Informatsionnaya rabota strategicheskoy razvedki. Osnovnyie printsipyi (). Moskva: Izdatelstvo inostrannoy literaturyi, 1958. 341 р.
5. Fragmentyi rannih grecheskih filosofov. Chast I. Ot epicheskih teokosmogoniy do vozniknoveniya atomistiki (). Moskva: Nauka, 1989. 576 р.
6. Yamvlih. O Pifagorovoy zhizni (). Moskva: Aleteya, 2002. 192 р.
7. Anecdota Graeca e Codibus Regiis Descripsit Annotatione Illustravit J.Fr. Boissonade. Parisiis, 1829. 472 p.
8. Betts R.K. Analysis, war, and decision. Why Intelligence Failures are Inevitable. Intelligence Theory. Key questions and debates. London, New York: Routledge, 2009. 235 p.
9. Birley A. Marcus Aurelius. A Biography. New York: Routledge, 2000. 320 p.
10. Bush B. Logic of Military Intelligence Failures. – Fort Leavenworth: School of Advanced Military Studies and General Staff College, 2013. 48 p.
11. Cederblom J., Paulsen D. Critical Reasoning. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning, 2011. 460 p.
12. Debating the War of Ideas. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. 264 p.
13. Definitions and Definability: Philosophical Perspectives. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989. 323 p.
14. Echevarria A. II. Strategic Culture: More Problems than Prospects. Infinity Journal, Volume 3, Issue 2, Spring 2013, pages 4­7.
15. Fingar T. Reducing Uncertainty. Intelligence Analysis and National Security. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011. 176 p.
16. Frege G. On Sense and Reference. Translations of Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1960. – 244 p.
17. Goldman J. Words of Intelligence. Lanham, Toronto, Oxford: The Scarecrow Press, Inc., 2006. 173 p.
18. Greek and Roman Military Writers. Selected Readings. London and New York: Routledge, 2004. 231 p.
19. Heuer R.J. Jr. Psychology of Intelligence Analysis. CIA: Center for the Study of Intelligence, 1999. 184 p.
20. Heuer R.J. Jr., Pherson R. H. Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis – Washington: CQ Press, 2011. 343 p.
21. Hill R. J. French Strategy After De Gaulle. Military Review, Volume XLVIII ­­ November 1968. № 11.
22. Huffman C. Archytas of Tarentum. Pythagorean, Philosopher and Mathematician King. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 665 p.
23. Kahn D. An Historical Theory of Intelligence. Intelligence Theory. Key questions and debates. London, New York: Routledge, 2009. 235 p.
24. Kleemeier U. Grundfragen einer philosophischen Theorie des Krieges: Platon ­ Hobbes – Clausewitz. Berlin: Akademie­Verlag, 2002. 339 p.
25. Kuhns W.J. Intelligence Failures: Forecasting and the Lessons of Epistemology. Paradoxes of Strategic Intelligence. Essays in Honor of Michael I.Handel, ed. by R.K. Betts, T.G. Mahnken. London, Portland, OR: Frank Cass, 2003. 204 p.
26. Liddell Hart B. H. Strategy. New York: A Meridian Book, 1991. 426 p.
27. Liddell Hart B.H. The History of the First World War. London: Pan Books LTD, 1970. 504 p.
28. Liddell Hart B.H. The Other Side of the Hill. Germany’s Generals, Their Rise and Fall, With Their Own Account on Military Events 1939­1945. Delhi: Army Publishers, 1965. 392 p.
29. Marrin S. Improving Intelligence Analysis. Bridging the Gap Between Scholarship and Practice. London and New York: Routledge, 2011. 182 p.
30. McLynn F. Marcus Aurelius. A Life. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press, 2009. 684 p.
31. Median C. What to do when Traditional Models Fail. Secret Intelligence. A Reader. London and New York: Routledge, 2009. 552 p.
32. Mill J.S. System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, Being Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers, 1848. 600 p.
33. Moore D.T. Critical Thinking and Intelligence Analysis. Washington: National Defense Intelligence College, 2009. 134 p.
34. Moseley A. A Philosophy of War. New York: Algora Publishing, 2002. 266 p.
35. Muirhead J.H. German Philosophy in Relation to the War. London: John Murray, 1915. 110 p.
36. Onosandri strategicus. sive de imperatoris institutione. Acessit. Nicolaus Rigaltius P. Nunc primum e vetustis Codd. Graecis publicavit, Latina interpretatione et notis illustravit. Acessit seorsim in eundem Onosandrum Iani Gruteri uberior commentarius. Item M.Aemilii Porti, Fr. Porti Cretensis F. Heidelberg: ex officina Commeliniana, 1600. 201 p. // http://www.e­rara.ch/doi/10.3931/e­rara­11167
37. Perry R.B. The Present Conflict of Ideals. A Study of Philosophical Background of the World War. New York, London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1918. 545 p.
38. Pherson K.H., Pherson R.H. Critical Thinking for Strategic Intelligence ­ Washington: CQ Press,2013. 329p.
39. Posidonius. Vol. III. The Translation of the Fragments.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1999. 414 р.
40. Russell R.L. Sharpening Strategic Intelligence. Why the CIA Gets It Wrong, And What Needs To Be Done To Get It Right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 214 p.
41. Scarre G. Logic and Reality in the Philosophy of John Stewart Mill. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989. 242 p.
42. Sims J.E. Decision Advantage and the Nature of Intelligence Analysis. Oxford Handbook of National Security Intelligence, the / ed. by L.K. Johnson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. 886 p.
43. Sondhaus L. Strategic Culture and Ways of War. London And New York: Routledge, 2008. 152 p.
44. Strategic Cultures in Europe. Security and Defence Policies across the Continent. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2013. 407 p.
45. Teichman J. The Philosophy of War and Peace. Exeter: Imprint Academic, 2006. 260 p.
46. Walsh P.F. Intelligence and Intelligence Analysis. ­ London and New York: Routledge, 2011. 332 p.
47. Walton T. Challenges in Intelligence Analysis. Lessons from 1300 BCE to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. 294 p.
Published
2014-06-26
How to Cite
Loboda, Y. (2014). Philosophia ad bellum. Grani, 17(8), 40-46. Retrieved from https://grani.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/590
Section
PHILOSOPHY