Khajdeghghers socio ontology in his existenzial ontology and phenomenology


  • Je. V. Rahmaylov Zhytomyr State University named after I. Frank
Keywords: social ontology, ekzistenzial ontology, philosophy of history, social philosophy, Heidegger

Abstract

As a result of the article studies the principles sotsioontolohiyi M. Heidegger can draw several conclusions.Overcoming Metaphysics realized the author is not least due to the construction of authentic subjectivity as ambivalent , that is, as a finite­ relational and , at the same time ­ quite ­ infinite . Through all versions hermanotsentrychnu criticism of metaphysics, Heidegger acts as an apologist for the German philosophy of sociality. End of humanistic man in his self ­ universalist cosmopolitan image inevitably revealed in the hidden sociologized ontology that Heidegger justified .By the author of “overcoming metaphysics” is the self­revelation of the essence of socio­ Logos, allowing you to understand the philosophical discourse as kvazisotsiolohiyu . On the other hand, haydehers “ Being and Time “ for specious remark V. Molchanov, there is little “you”, “other” , while knowledge of the other is dorefleksyvnym and continuous, as opposed to the knowledge of himself. “Other”, which occupy a center of social support in social reality “ life­world “, are one of the modes of Dasein. The philosophy of “ Being and Time” includes a search of the true nature of a man who sees his opening , but a human being is placed in the context of social order and stability control.

Author Biography

Je. V. Rahmaylov, Zhytomyr State University named after I. Frank
postgraduate

References

1. Gajdenko P.P. Jekzistencializm i problema kul’tury (Kritika filosofii M. Hajdeggera). Moscwa, 1963, 211 р.
2. Berger P., Lukmai T. Social’noe konstruirovanie real’nosti. Moscwa, Al’ta, 1995, 208 p.
3. Gusserl’, Je. Ideja fenomenologii. SPb, Gumanitarnaja Akademija, 2006, 224 p.
4. Gusserl’, Je. Intencional’nye predmety. Logos, 2001, no. 5/6 (31), pp. 135­164.
5. Gusserl’, Je. Kartezianskie meditacii. Moscwa, DIK, 2001, 141 s.
6. Gusserl’, Je. Kartezianskie razmyshlenija. SPb, Nauka, 1998, 315 p.
7. Gusserl’, Je. Krizis evropejskih nauk i transcendental’naja fenomenologija. SPb, : Vladimir Dal’, 2004, 398 p.
8. Nicshe F. Volja k vlasti. Opyt pereocenki vseh cennostej. Moscwa, Logos, 1995, 312 p.
9. Nicshe F. O pol’ze i vrede istorii dlja zhizni. // Nicshe F. Sochinenija, vol.1. Moscwa, Nauka, 1990, 233 p.
10. Mihajlov I.A. Rannij Hajdegger. Moscwa, Ad Marginem, 1999, 224p.
11. Molchanov V.I. Cogito. Sintez i sub#ektivizm. //V.I. Molchanov. Voprosy filosofii. Moscwa, Izd­vo MGU, 1996, no.10, pp.88­96.
12. Motroshilova, N.V. Raboty raznyh let: izbrannye stat’i i jesse. Moscwa, «Fenomenologija ­ Germenevtika», 2005; 576 p.
13. Hajdegger M. Raboty i razmyshlenija raznyh let Moscwa, Gnozis,1993, 321p.
14. Hajdegger M. Vremja i bytie: Stat’i i vystuplenija. Moscwa, Respublika, 1993, 448p.
15. Adorno T.W. Jargon der Eigentlichkeit. Frankfurt, a. M, 1964.
16. Bernstein , R. Heidegger on Humanism. Illinois, 1978.
17. Habermas J. The Philosophical Discours of Modernity. Cambridge, Cambridge­Univ.Press, 1987.
18. Haag К.­Н. Kritik der Neuren Ontologie. Stuttgart, Dorn­Verlag, 1960.
19. Blumberg H. The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. Cambridge, Cambridge­Univ.Press, 1983.
20. Dallmair F. Ontology of Freedom: Heidegger and Political Philosophy. Chicago, Faster, 1973.
21. Caputo J. Radical Hermeneutics. London, New­York, Sage, 1981.
Published
2014-06-18
How to Cite
Rahmaylov, J. (2014). Khajdeghghers socio ontology in his existenzial ontology and phenomenology. Grani, 17(7), 47-51. Retrieved from https://grani.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/568
Section
PHILOSOPHY