Job presentation potential of modern family education: risks and hazards

  • I. I. Dorozhko Kharkiv national pedagogical university H.S. Skovoroda
Keywords: individual, family, family education, postindustrial era, vocational work, family relationships, family values


Important functions of family education are conscious choice of profession, familiarization of children, adolescents and youth labor market, formation of self­discipline and personal qualities required for the desired work or position. In modern societies with rapidly modernizing people have to change profession and engage in during their life continuing education to take its rightful place in the labor market. Family education, which in questions of career counseling is guided by common sense guidance only and focuses solely on the prestige of the profession, could cause the collapse of a young man living in a situation  of  impairment experiences of parents. The same applies to the purposeful formation of dynasties and elite, an instrument which is family education that defines personality development in the direction of a given profession a family tradition. Risks connected with the loss of freedom of choice, hide a threat of self­identity, life plans if it does not coincide with the plans of the family. In contrast to career guidance of family education in industrial society in the post­industrial time vocational work under family education should emphasize more the points that affect the work ethic and the formation of human qualities necessary to adapt to changes in the labor market in terms of active and mobile society.Family education plays a crucial role in professional self­identity. After all, it comes first in the family to include the world of work, the formation of self­discipline, not in the least defined family values, meaning and guidance of family education.

Author Biography

I. I. Dorozhko, Kharkiv national pedagogical university H.S. Skovoroda
PhD in psychological science, аssociate рrofessor


Berger P. Sotsiologiya: Biograficheskiy podhod (Sociology). Lichnostno­orientirovannaya sotsiologiya. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2004. Р. 103­128.

Bodriyyar Zh. Obschestvo potrebleniya. Ego mifyi i strukturyi (Consumer society . Its myths and structures). M. : Kulturnaya revolyutsiya; Respublika, 2006. 269 р.

Osipova A. A. Obschaya psihokorrektsiya : ucheb. pos. dlya stud. vuzov (Overall psychocorrection). M. : TTs Sfera, 2007. 512 р.

Polishchuk V. Psykholohiia simi : navchalnyi posibnyk (Family Psychology). Sumy : Universytetska knyha, 2009. 282 р.

Polishchuk V. M. Sotsialna psykholohiia (prohramni osnovy, zmistovi moduli, informatsiine zabezpechennia) (Social Psychology (program base, thematic modules, information)). Sumy : VTD “Universytetska knyha”, 2006. 217 р.

Prostir art­terapii (Space art therapy). K. : Milenium, 2007. Vyp 1. 162 р.

Froid Z. Vstup do psykhoanalizu (Introduction to psychoanalysis). K. : Osnovy, 1998. 709 р.

Mitchell B. Ann The boomerang age: transitions to adulthood in families. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 2006. 230 р.

How to Cite
Dorozhko, I. I. (2014). Job presentation potential of modern family education: risks and hazards. Scientific and Theoretical Almanac Grani, 17(4), 24-29. Retrieved from