Content and value for concepts of «government coup», «military coup» and a «political coup»
Keywords:
military coup, government coup, political upheaval, political activism, political process, government
Abstract
Problems of illegitimate acquiring or changing government domination have always been in terms of philosophers’ and scientists’attention for long periods.In today’s world the phenomenon of revolution in the country fully associated with the process of obtaining political power.Usually coups are intended for external effects, their political color and specific climate always cause interestand are commented by all the media.Being discussed by the public the government coups as an illegitimate way of coming to power, requires strict interpretation and reasonable conceptual definition that allowssignificantly assess the political processes in society.The aim of this article is to review and to analyze the concept of ‘military coup’, ‘government coup’ and ‘political coup’that exist in political science; to determine the sampling parameters on the content and structure of each concept and to carry out their clarification.When working on definitions of these concepts generally we used scientific methods of system analysis and synthesis, political science methods: structural and functional comparison. As a result of this work the author has refined the reasonable definition of ‘military coup’, ‘government coup’ and ‘political coup’. The conceptual basis of the concepts are determined in this article. The aim of these concepts is to provide planned, organized, containing elements of abruptness which leads to destruction the existing political power in violation of constitutional and legal norms and principles, accompanied by force or threat of it straight.References
1.Арistotel. Politika.Sochineniia v 4 – kh.tomakh( Aristotle. Politics).Мoskov, 1983, vol. 4, 830р.
2.АntsupovYa. Slovarpokonfliktologii. (Antsupov Y. Dictionary of Conflict).SPb.Piter,2006, 528 р.
3. Bankovuch M.. Gosudarstvennyu perevorot, pronunsiamento, putch: teoreticheskiy analis (Bankovi M. Coup, government coup, pronunciamento: a theoretical analysis). – Vesnik MGU: Seriia :Istoriia. Politologiia.Sotsiologiia. –– 2008. –no 2. – P.312
4.Voennyu perevorot 1973 goda vChili.Neoliberalnyumif оPinochete:Voennoe obozreniye.(1973 military coup in Chile. Neoliberal myth of Pinochet: Military Review). Regime to access:
http://topwar.ru/33164voennyyperevorot1973godavchilineoliberalnyymifopinochete.html
5.Galustyan O. О gosudarstvennykh perevorotakh: sravnitelnoistorichesriy aspect voprosa (GalustyanO. Coups: acomparativehistorical aspect of the question). Меzhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo I mezhdunarodnaiay ustitsiia. 2010,no3, Pp.1925
6.GlazunovO. Gosudarstvennyu perevorot. Strategiia I tekhnologiia(O. Glazunov Statecoup. Strategy and technology). М.: ОLМАPRЕSS. Оbrazovaniye, 2006,p.448 (Dоsyе)
7.Gege lG. Raboty raznykh let v dvukh tomakh (Hegel, works of different years in two volumes).М.: Мysl,1971,vol. 2,630p.
8.Gobbs T. Sochineniia v dvukh tomakh. (Works of Thomas Hobbes).М.: Мysl, 1989,vol.1,622p.
9.Gyugo V.Napoleon Malyu (Hugo V. Small Napoleon) .Regime to access:
http://royallib.ru/book/gyugo_viktor/napoleon_maliy.html.
10.Каnt I. Sochineniia v 6 – titomakh(WorksofKant). М.: Мysl, 1963, vol.1,543 p.
11. Каnt I .Sochineniia v 6 –titomakh(WorksofKant). М.: Мysl, 1965, vol.4, 478 p.
12.Lyuttvak E. Gosudarstvennyu perevorot (E. Luttwak. Government coup).М.: Universitet Dmitriia Pozharskogo, 2012, 326 р.
13. МаlaparteК. Теkhnika gosudarstvennogo perevorota (Malaparte K. Technique of government coup).М.: Аgraf, 1988, 224 p.
14.Маrks К. 18 bryumera Lyi Bonaparta (Marx K. 18 Brumaire). Regime to access:
http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/History/Article/marx_18.php
15.Pankevich F. Kappovskiy putch v Germanii (Pankevich F. Kapp Putsch in Germany). М.:Nauka, 1972,195р.
16.Pale S. Fidzhi. V chrede gosudarstvennukh perevorotov (Palais S. Fiji. In a series of coups. Asia and Africa nowadays).АziyaiАfrikasegodnia.2003,no 8,Pp. 4345.
17.Platon. Sochineniia v 4kh – tomakh (Platon’sworks). М.:Мysl, 1994, vol.3, 654p.
18.Petrov М. Меkhanizmy gosudarstvennukh perevorotov (Petrov M. Mechanisms coups).М.: АSТ; Мinsk: Kcarvest,2005, 400 p.
19.Prudon P. Chto takoe sobstvennost? ili Issledovanie оprintsype prava i vlasti; Bednost kak ekonomicheskiy printsyp; Pornokratiia, ili Zhenshchiny v nastoyashchee vremia (P. Proudhon, What Property is or the study of the principle of law and power; Poverty as an economic principle; Pornokratiya or Women nowadays).М.: Respublika, 1998,. 367 p
20.Politologiia: [navch.posibnyk.] / Yu.I. Маkаr.,О.Yu.Dokash,Т.P.Lavruk/.(Politics. Yu.I.Makar., O.Yu .Dokash, T.P.Lavruk).Chernivtsi :Chernivtskyi natsionalnyi universytet,2010,. 596p
21.Politologichnyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk /V.Khramov / (Encyclopedic Dictionary of Political Science). Regime to access:http://subject.com.ua/political/dict/417.html
22.Politologichnyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk [navch.posibnykdlia studentiv vyshykc н navchalnykc zakladiv] (Encyclopedic Dictionary of Political Science).Кyiv: Geneza 1997, 400p.
23. Politologichnyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk[uporiadnyk V.P. Gorbatenko; za red.Yu. S. Shemshuchenka, V.D. Babkina, V.P. Gorbatenka] (Encyclopedic Dictionary of Political Science). Кyiv.: Geneza, 2004, 736p., 2е vyd., dop. і pereroblene.
24.Sivkina Yu. Putch Khilona v Sparte (Sivkina Yu Putsch Chilo in Sparta). Мnemon:issledovanieI publikatsii antichnogo mira.2006, no 5, Pp.241250.
25.Тrankvil S.Zhizn dvenadtsati Tzezarey(Trankville S. Lives of the Twelve Caesars).Regime to access:http://modernlib.ru/books/trankvill_gay_svetoniy/zhizn_dvenadcati_cezarey.
26. Тrebin М Armiiy I polityka:istorychna retrospektyva vzaiemodii (Trebin M. Army and Politics: Historical Retrospective interaction).Politychnyi menedzhment,2012,no 45, Pр. 141153
27.Тrebin М. Viiskovyi perevorot yak sotsialnopolitychnyi fenomen (Trebin M. Military coup as a sociopolitical phenomenon). Nova polityka,2000,no 6, P.5156.
28.YUrydychna entsyklopediia (Registeredencyclopedia). Regime to access:
http://leksika.com.ua/15710312/legal/derzhavniy_perevorot
29.Agulhon M. Coup d’Etat et Republique /Maurice Agulhon . – Paris , Presses de Sciences Po, Reihe La Bibliothque ducitoyen, 1997.
2.АntsupovYa. Slovarpokonfliktologii. (Antsupov Y. Dictionary of Conflict).SPb.Piter,2006, 528 р.
3. Bankovuch M.. Gosudarstvennyu perevorot, pronunsiamento, putch: teoreticheskiy analis (Bankovi M. Coup, government coup, pronunciamento: a theoretical analysis). – Vesnik MGU: Seriia :Istoriia. Politologiia.Sotsiologiia. –– 2008. –no 2. – P.312
4.Voennyu perevorot 1973 goda vChili.Neoliberalnyumif оPinochete:Voennoe obozreniye.(1973 military coup in Chile. Neoliberal myth of Pinochet: Military Review). Regime to access:
http://topwar.ru/33164voennyyperevorot1973godavchilineoliberalnyymifopinochete.html
5.Galustyan O. О gosudarstvennykh perevorotakh: sravnitelnoistorichesriy aspect voprosa (GalustyanO. Coups: acomparativehistorical aspect of the question). Меzhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo I mezhdunarodnaiay ustitsiia. 2010,no3, Pp.1925
6.GlazunovO. Gosudarstvennyu perevorot. Strategiia I tekhnologiia(O. Glazunov Statecoup. Strategy and technology). М.: ОLМАPRЕSS. Оbrazovaniye, 2006,p.448 (Dоsyе)
7.Gege lG. Raboty raznykh let v dvukh tomakh (Hegel, works of different years in two volumes).М.: Мysl,1971,vol. 2,630p.
8.Gobbs T. Sochineniia v dvukh tomakh. (Works of Thomas Hobbes).М.: Мysl, 1989,vol.1,622p.
9.Gyugo V.Napoleon Malyu (Hugo V. Small Napoleon) .Regime to access:
http://royallib.ru/book/gyugo_viktor/napoleon_maliy.html.
10.Каnt I. Sochineniia v 6 – titomakh(WorksofKant). М.: Мysl, 1963, vol.1,543 p.
11. Каnt I .Sochineniia v 6 –titomakh(WorksofKant). М.: Мysl, 1965, vol.4, 478 p.
12.Lyuttvak E. Gosudarstvennyu perevorot (E. Luttwak. Government coup).М.: Universitet Dmitriia Pozharskogo, 2012, 326 р.
13. МаlaparteК. Теkhnika gosudarstvennogo perevorota (Malaparte K. Technique of government coup).М.: Аgraf, 1988, 224 p.
14.Маrks К. 18 bryumera Lyi Bonaparta (Marx K. 18 Brumaire). Regime to access:
http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/History/Article/marx_18.php
15.Pankevich F. Kappovskiy putch v Germanii (Pankevich F. Kapp Putsch in Germany). М.:Nauka, 1972,195р.
16.Pale S. Fidzhi. V chrede gosudarstvennukh perevorotov (Palais S. Fiji. In a series of coups. Asia and Africa nowadays).АziyaiАfrikasegodnia.2003,no 8,Pp. 4345.
17.Platon. Sochineniia v 4kh – tomakh (Platon’sworks). М.:Мysl, 1994, vol.3, 654p.
18.Petrov М. Меkhanizmy gosudarstvennukh perevorotov (Petrov M. Mechanisms coups).М.: АSТ; Мinsk: Kcarvest,2005, 400 p.
19.Prudon P. Chto takoe sobstvennost? ili Issledovanie оprintsype prava i vlasti; Bednost kak ekonomicheskiy printsyp; Pornokratiia, ili Zhenshchiny v nastoyashchee vremia (P. Proudhon, What Property is or the study of the principle of law and power; Poverty as an economic principle; Pornokratiya or Women nowadays).М.: Respublika, 1998,. 367 p
20.Politologiia: [navch.posibnyk.] / Yu.I. Маkаr.,О.Yu.Dokash,Т.P.Lavruk/.(Politics. Yu.I.Makar., O.Yu .Dokash, T.P.Lavruk).Chernivtsi :Chernivtskyi natsionalnyi universytet,2010,. 596p
21.Politologichnyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk /V.Khramov / (Encyclopedic Dictionary of Political Science). Regime to access:http://subject.com.ua/political/dict/417.html
22.Politologichnyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk [navch.posibnykdlia studentiv vyshykc н navchalnykc zakladiv] (Encyclopedic Dictionary of Political Science).Кyiv: Geneza 1997, 400p.
23. Politologichnyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk[uporiadnyk V.P. Gorbatenko; za red.Yu. S. Shemshuchenka, V.D. Babkina, V.P. Gorbatenka] (Encyclopedic Dictionary of Political Science). Кyiv.: Geneza, 2004, 736p., 2е vyd., dop. і pereroblene.
24.Sivkina Yu. Putch Khilona v Sparte (Sivkina Yu Putsch Chilo in Sparta). Мnemon:issledovanieI publikatsii antichnogo mira.2006, no 5, Pp.241250.
25.Тrankvil S.Zhizn dvenadtsati Tzezarey(Trankville S. Lives of the Twelve Caesars).Regime to access:http://modernlib.ru/books/trankvill_gay_svetoniy/zhizn_dvenadcati_cezarey.
26. Тrebin М Armiiy I polityka:istorychna retrospektyva vzaiemodii (Trebin M. Army and Politics: Historical Retrospective interaction).Politychnyi menedzhment,2012,no 45, Pр. 141153
27.Тrebin М. Viiskovyi perevorot yak sotsialnopolitychnyi fenomen (Trebin M. Military coup as a sociopolitical phenomenon). Nova polityka,2000,no 6, P.5156.
28.YUrydychna entsyklopediia (Registeredencyclopedia). Regime to access:
http://leksika.com.ua/15710312/legal/derzhavniy_perevorot
29.Agulhon M. Coup d’Etat et Republique /Maurice Agulhon . – Paris , Presses de Sciences Po, Reihe La Bibliothque ducitoyen, 1997.
Published
2014-02-11
How to Cite
Mezhenskaya, O. (2014). Content and value for concepts of «government coup», «military coup» and a «political coup». Grani, 17(3), 46-52. Retrieved from https://grani.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/452
Issue
Section
POLITICAL SCIENCE
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
When reporting experiments on human subjects, authors should indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, the authors must explain the rationale for their approach, and demonstrate that the institutional review body explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. When reporting experiments on animals, authors should be asked to indicate whether the institutional and national guide for the care and use of laboratory animals was followed.
When reporting experiments on human subjects, authors should indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, the authors must explain the rationale for their approach, and demonstrate that the institutional review body explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. When reporting experiments on animals, authors should be asked to indicate whether the institutional and national guide for the care and use of laboratory animals was followed.
