Realitas vs wirklichkeit: the genesis of the two concepts of western metaphysics

  • V. Y. Popov Donetsk national university
Keywords: reality, activities, real, realitas, haecceitas, , Wirklichkeit, reism, actualism


The terms «reality» and «reality» are used interchangeably, or quite similar to each other іn the modern Ukrainian philosophical literature. However, they have significant substantive differences, which not only with their etymology, but also fundamentally different metaphysical foundations of their origin and use. Category «reality» in the European metaphysics is closely linked substantiality, and not as a process. Category «reality» reflects a dynamic dimension of being, and originates from the «» «Metaphysics» of Aristotle, which later developed into the category of German philosophy Wirklichkeit». In the article it is proved that the notions of «realitas» and «Wirklichkeit» born in the end of the age of high scholasticism, and their founders were Duns Scotus and Eckhart Meister. In particular, the concept of «realitas» is entered Duns Scotus to denote «ultima realitas» («ultimate reality») things that is haecceitas «thisness» individual things. The concept of «realitas» (reality) speaking only a subsidiary subsequently in Western ontology acquires metaphysical significance. Eckhart Meister borrows from albert the Great, the term «actualitas» (actuality) and translates this word into the language of their sermons as «wercelicheit», which later became «Wirklichkeit». This word in the mouth of a preacher mystic ceases to be a simple translation of «actualitas» turning from the Divine actus purus in «non­action activities». However, these mystical layering subsequently disappear; Сh. Wolf word «Wirklichkeit» means the certainty of the existence or possible implementation. However, in the German classics (I. Kant, G. Hegel) a continued separation «Wirklichkeit­Realitt». In Marxism reality more and more identified with the objective reality. Similar processes occur in the English­analytic philosophy (for example L. Wittgenstein). However, the article notes that the problem of the delimitation of the categories of «reality» and «reality» is becoming increasingly important in connection with the emergence of radical constructivism. this distinction is need to define two metaphysical paradigm: reists and actualists, indicated іn the conclusions .

Author Biography

V. Y. Popov, Donetsk national university
doctor of philosophical sciences, associate professor, Full Prof.


1. Arystotel. Metafyzyka (Aristotle. Metaphysics). Sochyneniya v 4 tomah, Moscow, 1976. Vol. 1. P.63­368.
2. Bredshou David. Arystotel na Vostoke I na Zapade: metafizika y` razdelenye hristianskogo mira (Aristotle East and West: Metaphysics and the Division of Christendom). Moscow, 2012. 384 p.
3. Wittgenstein L. Golubaya knyga (The Blue Books). Moscow, 1999. 127 p.
4. Wittgenstein L. Logiko­filosofskiy traktat (The Logical­Philosophical Treatise) / Per. s nem. Dobronravova Y. i Laxuty D. – Moscow, 1958. – 133 p.
5. Wittgenstein L. Filosofskie raboti (The Philosophical works). Moscow, 1994. 317 p.
6. Wittgenstein L. Tractatus Logico­Philosophicus. Filosofski doslidzhennya (The Logical­Philosophical Treatise. The Philosophical Investigations). Kyiv, 1995. 311 p.
7. Hegel G. W. F. Enciklopediya filosofsksh nauk. T. 1. Nauka logiki (The Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences. Vol.1. The Science of Logic). Moscow, 1974. 452 p.
8. Duns Scot John. Izbrannoe (The Favorites). Moscow, 2001. 583 p.
9. Filosofskiy slovnyk (The Philosophical dictionary). Kyiv, 1986. 800 p.
10. Heidegger M. Nauka i osmislenie (The Science and comprehension). Moscow, 1993. p.214­286.
11. Schopenhauer A. Novie paralipomeny (New Paralipomena). Moscow, 2000. P.55­362.
12. Eсkhart. Ob otreshennosti (On Detachment). Moscow­St. Petersburg, 2001. 432 p.
13. Aquinas, S. Thomas. Summa theolgiae, 1952. 378 р.
14. Caputo J. Mystical Element in Heidegger’s Thought. New York, 1986. 326 р.
15. Duns Scotus Ioannes. Questiones subtilissime in metaphysicam Aristotelis [Electronic resource]. Access to the document: www.franciscan­
16. Duns Scotus Ioannes. Tractatus de primo principio. Moscoviae, 2001. 181 p.
17. Eckhart Meister. Die deutschen und lateinischen Werke. Herausgegeben im Auftrage der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft. 11 Vols. Stuttgart and Berlin: Verlag W. Kohlhammer, 1936. 542 P.
18. Heidegger Martin Die Kategorien­ und Bedeutungslehre des Duns Scotus. Frankfurt am Main, 1916. 245 P.
19. Kant Immanuel. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1990. 456 P.
20. The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2008. 416 р.
21. Wittgenstein Ludwig. Logisch­philosophische Abhandlung, W. Ostwald (Hrsg.), Annalen der Naturphilosophie, Band 14, 1921. 131 P.
22. Wittgenstein Ludwig. Tractatus Logico­Philosophicus /containing the original German, alongside both the Ogden/Ramsey, and Pears/McGuinness English translations: Published by Kegan Paul London, 1922.
23. Wolff Christian. Vernnftige Gedanken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen
berhaupt / Christian Wolff – Hildesheim, 1983. (Reprint of the editio: Frankfurt; Leipzig, 1729.). 564 P.
How to Cite
Popov, V. (2014). Realitas vs wirklichkeit: the genesis of the two concepts of western metaphysics. Grani, 17(3), 16-22. Retrieved from