Сognition in the aspect of self-knowledge and cognition other: intuition, penetrating as display of mind and internalss of leader. Appearance of philosophy as a result and cultural construkt- reason of development of brain of man in the evolutional chai


  • O. V. Chuikova Odessa national medical university
Keywords: cognition, consciousness, neopallium, transdisciplinary method, philosophy

Abstract

People are inclined to determine other people on their talents and defects. But when we name someone «clever» or «penetrating», and someone «foolish» or «near», we already do not talk about the narrow special lines. We go far nearer near determination of essence of personality, to determination of personality, but not her properties. To be «clever» (or «foolish») is not your property, it is you. Curiously, that is present certain degree of independence between this global measuring of human mind and more narrow special lines. But what do we imply under terms «penetrating» and «near»? And that are cerebral structures individual variations of that determine these global lines? In the last two decades a transition happened in behalf on the «plural aspects of intellect». In­specific «intellects» more or less correspond to the cognition variables systematic studied by specialists on cognition neuroscience. Thus, it is possible to make gradation of mind: general mind, genius, specific intellects. Largely a line speech goes about that behaves to our ability to understand other people and foresee their behavior, reasons and intentions. Taking into account public character of our life, this ability has a major value for our success with the widest sense. In description of substantial managing functions, the aspects of sequence, planning, temporal arrangement are important. We will model a situation, that you must plan and consistently organize your actions in co­ordination with the group of other individuals and establishments, engaged in planning and successive organization of their actions. To succeed in this co­operation, you must not only be able to work out a plan your own actions, but you also must manage to get to nature of plans of other participants. Each, who possesses ability of penetration in the soul of other people, intuitively perceived as «clever» or «penetrating», and each, whoever possesses this ability, perceived as «foolish» or «near». Using these descriptions, it is possible to catch cognition essence of individual, unlike his narrow cognition lines. Ability to form an internal form about the soul of other personality it is related to other fundamental cognition ability: by the concept of consciousness and differentiation of I­not­I. Consciousness is fundamental for our psychical life and, probably, without him there is not difficult cognition activity. However scientific data testify that consciousness appears during an evolution late and it is related to development of frontal stakes.

Author Biography

O. V. Chuikova, Odessa national medical university
PhD in philosophy, associate professor

References

1. Goldberg E., 2003. Upravlyaushij mozg: Lobnie doli, liderstvo i civilizatiya [Managing brain: the Frontal stakes, leadership and civilization]. Moscow, 335 (in Russian).
2. Doidge N., 2011. Plasticnost’ mozga: Potryasaushie facti o tom, kak misli sposobni menyat’ structuru i funkcii nashego mozga [Plasticity of brain : the Staggering facts about that, how ideas are able to change a structure and functions of нашeго brain]. Moscow, 544. / http: // loveread.ws/ read_book.php?id=44682@p=1 (in Russian).
3. Kassen B., 2000. Effekt sofistiki [Effect of sophistry]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, 240. (in Russian).
4. Kassirer E., 1998. Filosofija sim Kassenvoliceskih form [Philosophy of symbolic forms]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, 372. (in Russian).
5. Horkhajmer M., Adorno T., 1997. Dialektika prosveshenija. Filosofskie fragmenti [Dialectics of inlightening. Philosophical fragments]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, (in Russian).
6. Jung K.G., 1997. Chelovek I ego simvoli [Man and his symbols]. Moscow, 378. (in Russian).
7. Jaspers K., 1991. Smisl I naznacenije istorii [Sense and setting of history]. Moscow, 527. (in Russian).
Published
2016-06-14
How to Cite
Chuikova, O. (2016). Сognition in the aspect of self-knowledge and cognition other: intuition, penetrating as display of mind and internalss of leader. Appearance of philosophy as a result and cultural construkt- reason of development of brain of man in the evolutional chai. Grani, 19(7), 25-29. https://doi.org/10.15421/171628
Section
PHILOSOPHY