Opportunities and threats of political order organisation in institutional dimension of political system functioning


  • O. V. Bashtannyk The Oles Honchar Dnepropetrovsk national university
Keywords: political institute, political institution, political order, social order, political system, institutionalization, fragmentation

Abstract

Proved that in the presence of the ground for nondemocratic transformations in political system intensified tendencies to differentiation rules of informal (institualized) order and functioning of formal (institutionalized) structures. A positive value of local plurality as important and even necessary part of the social order foundations is transformed into a negative role of fragmentation macropolitical order of public authorities, which segments power relations to the complex of microorders, in fact, semi-legal authority. Substantiated that the use of negative social capital promote the integration of «inner circle» of political players which interested in an advantageous result for them and disorganization of management official institutions within the national policy. Thus, with great certainty it is possible to speak about the presence in nondemocratic political regime of, at first sight, nonobvious benefits for ruling mechanism of the existence and functioning of informal, beyond the institutional, political order as a phenomenon of political reality. Politicians, effectively not fulfilling theirs part of the social contract with the people, try not to let the final break of this symbolic agreement at present and so through a variety of resources destabilize the consolidation of civil society. That can be manifested, for example, in the construction of such life circumstances (artificially or naturally), under which a person is compelled to resort to illegal methods of problem solving, then directly or indirectly may reproach her to minimize all attempts to fight against unjust government.

Author Biography

O. V. Bashtannyk, The Oles Honchar Dnepropetrovsk national university
PhD in political science, lecturer

References

1. Ankersmit, F. R., 2004. Reprezentativnaja demokratija. Jesteticheskij podhod k konfliktu i kompromissu [Representative democracy. The aesthetic approach to the conflict and compromise]. Logos 2 (42), 15-41 (in Russian).
2. Bejtson, G., Dzhekson, D. D., Hejli, Dzh., Uiklend, Dzh. H. K teorii shizofrenii [To the theory of schizophrenia]. Access: http://www.twirpx.com/file/658176/ (in Russian).
3. Berger, P., 1995. Social’noe konstruirovanie real’nosti. Traktat po sociologii znanija [Social Construction of Reality. Treatise on the sociology of knowledge]. Medium, Moscow (in Russian).
4. Grazhdane i politicheskie praktiki v sovremennoj Rossii: vosproizvodstvo i transformacija institucional’nogo porjadka [Citizens and political practices in modern Russia: the reproduction and transformation of the institutional order]. 2011. RAPN; ROSSPJeN, Moscow (in Russian).
5. Kindratec’, O. M., 2014. «Horoshe suspil’stvo» jak meta politychnoi’ modernizacii’ [«Good Society» as the purpose of political modernization]. Gumanitarnyj visnyk ZDIA 56, 82-190 (in Russian).
6. Panov, P. V. Politicheskij porjadok i problema vosproizvodstva vlasti: institut preemnika [Political Order and the problem of reproduction of power: the Institute of a successor]. Access: http://www.politex.info/content/view/720/30/ (in Russian).
7. Patrushev, S. V., 2011. Institucional’naja politologija v rossijskoj perspective [Institutional political science in the Russian perspective]. Politicheskaja konceptologija 4, 142–148 (in Russian).
8. Poceluev, S. P., 2008. Double bind’s ili dvojnye lovushki politicheskoj kommunikacii [Double bind’s or double traps of political communication]. Polis 1, 8-32 (in Russian).
9. Ritcer, Dzh., 2002. Sovremennye sociologicheskie teorii [Modern sociological theories]. Piter, SPb. (in Russian).
10. Rjabchuk, N. Zakon soobshhajushhihsja sosudov i nekotorye drugie zakony [Communicating vessels and some other laws]. Access: http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2006/50/riab15-pr.html (in Russian).
11. Semenchonok, T. V., 2007. Politychnyj porjadok jak forma organizacii’ politychnogo zhyttja: teoretyko-metodologichnyj aspekt: avtoref. dys. … kand. polit. nauk: 23.00.01 [The political order as a form of the organization of political life: theoretical and methodological aspects]. Dnipropetrovs’kyj nacional’nyj univ. imeni O. Gonchara, Dnipropetrovs’k (in Ukrainian).
12. Shmatko, N. A., 2001. Pljuralizacija social’nogo porjadka i social’naja topologija [Pluralization of social order and social topology]. Socis 9, 14–19 (in Russian).
13. Shtompka, P., 2001. Ponjatie social’noj struktury: popytka obobshhenija [The concept of social structure: an attempt to generalize]. Socis 9, 3–13 (in Russian).
Published
2016-03-10
How to Cite
Bashtannyk, O. (2016). Opportunities and threats of political order organisation in institutional dimension of political system functioning. Grani, 19(4), 136-142. https://doi.org/10.15421/1716091
Section
POLITICAL SCIENCE