The causes of the Roman civil war, 49 B.C.: Julia and Crassus


  • A. P. Koval T. Shevchenko national university of Kyiv
Keywords: Pompey, Caesar, Crassus, Julia, Lucan, Pharsalia, Roman Civil war, Roman republic

Abstract

The title of the article is ‘The Causes of the Roman Civil War, 49 B.C.: Julia and Crassus’. The purpose of the article was to examine the theory, provided by ancient writers, according to which deaths of Julia and Marcus Licinius Crassus are interpreted as one of the causes of the Roman Civil war in 49 B.C. This theory wasn’t an object of the special research and many modern scholars take on trust accounts of the ancient writers, following Mommsen’s view. According to the sources, Julia was the «pledge of consent» between Pompey and Caesar, while Crassus was their mediator. In contrast, E. Gruen believed, that the deaths of Julia and Crassus had not been so ruinous for relations of Pompey and Caesar. For example, Julia had died in 54 B.C., but the Civil war started in 49 B.C. – according to the sources, it should have been started immediately after Julia’s death. The study tested, that the main source of such interpretation of Julia’s and Crassus’ deaths was Lucan’s ‘Pharsalia’. Such characterization of those is the most full in his poem. Textual analysis proves, that Lucan’s poem was a source of this theory for many other ancient writers. For example, Plutarch’s and Appian’s characterizations of Julia and Crassus are the same, as in ‘Pharsalia’, considering the translation from Latin to Greek. Further examination established that Lucan was the main propagandist of such characterization, but he wasn’t its author. Julia was described as the «pledge of consent» in writings of Velleius Paterculus and Valerius Maximus that had been written in a few decades before ‘Pharsalia’. However, there is no such characterization in writings of Cicero and Livius, who were the eyewitnesses of the Civil war. As a result, it was concluded, that such characterization had been formed among Roman writers of the early principate and retailed by Lucan. As a conclusion it must be emphasized, that close study of the ancient sources confirmed an idea that had been expressed by E. Gruen.

Author Biography

A. P. Koval, T. Shevchenko national university of Kyiv
postgraduate

References

1. Bokshchanin, A.G., 1981. Istochnikovedenie Drevnieho Rima [A Source Study of the Ancient Rome]. Izd. Mosk. Univ., Moscow (in Russian).
2. Horbulich, I.S., 2006. Dinasticheskii brak kak politicheskoie orudie v kariere Pompeia Vielikoho [A Dynastic Marriage as a political tool in a career of Pompey the Great]. Mnemon. 5, 287-298 (in Russian).
3. Egorov, A.B., 2014. Yulii Tsezar. Politicheskaia biografia [Julius Caesae. A Political Biography]. Nestor-Istoria, SPb (in Russian).
4. Liubimova, O.V., 2013. Konflikt Krassa i Pompeia v 70 g. do n.e.e: ego zarozhdenie i prichiny [A Conflict between Crassus and Pompey in 70 B.C.: Its Genesis and Causes]. Studia Historica. 13, 136-157 (in Russian).
5. Mommsen, T., 1997. Istoriia Rima [A History of Rome]. Vol. 3. Feniks, Rostov-na-Donu (in Russian).
6. Utchenko, S.L., 1976. Iulii Tsezar [Julius Caesar]. Mysl, Moskva (in Russian).
7. Billows, R.A. 2009. Julius Caesar: The Colossus of Rome. Routledge, London & New York.
8. Bramble, J.C. 1982. Lucan. In: The Cambridge History of Classical Literature. Volume II: Latin Literature. E.J. Kenney, W.V. Clausen (ed.). Cambridge University Press, London & New York, 533-577.
9. Brunt, P.A. 1988. The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
10. Chiu, A. 2010. The Importance of Being Julia: Civil War, Historical Revision and the Mutable Past in Lucan`s Pharsalia. The Classical Journal. 105 (4), 343-360.
11. Everitt, A. 2003. Cicero. The Life and Times of Rome’s Greatest Politician. Random House, New York.
12. Goldsworthy, A. 2006. Caesar, Life of a Colossus. Yale University Press, New Haven.
13. Gruen, E.S. 1974. The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
14. Haley, S.P. 1985. The Five Wives of Pompey the Great. Greece & Rome. 32 (1), 49-59.
15. Kamm, A. 2006. Julius Caesar. A Life. Routledge, London.
16. Lintott, A.W. 1971. Lucan and the History of the Civil War. The Classical Quarterly. 21 (2), 488-505.
17. Marin, P. 2009. Blood in the Forum: The Struggle for the Roman Republic. Continuum, London and New York.
18. Marshall, B.A. 1976. Crassus: a Political Biography. Adolf M. Hakkert Publisher, Amsterdam.
19. Perrin, B. 1884. Lucan as Historical Source for Appian. The American Journal of Philology. 5 (3), 325-330.
20. Ramsey, J.T. 2009. The Proconsular Years: Politics at a Distance. In: A Companion to Julius Caesar. M. Griffin (ed.). Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 37-56.
21. Schettino, M.T. 2014. The Use of Historical Sources. In: A Companion to Plutarch. M. Beck (ed.). Blackwell, Oxford, 417-436.
22. Seager, R. 2002. Pompey the Great: a Political. Blackwell, Oxford
23. Shotter, D. 2005. The Fall of the Roman Republic. Routledge, London.
24. Southern, P. 2002. Pompey the Great. Tempus, Stroud & Charleston.
25. Swain, H., Davies, M.E. 2010. Aspects of Roman History 82 BC – AD 14. A Source-based Approach. Routledge, London and New York.
26. Syme R. 2002. Roman Revolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
27. Tatum, W. J. 2006. The Final Crisis. In: A Companion to the Roman Republic. N. Rosenstein, R. Morstein-Marx (ed.). Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
28. Wet, B.X. de. 1981. Aspects of Plutarch’s Portrayal of Pompey. Acta Classica. 24, 119-132.
Published
2016-03-12
How to Cite
Koval, A. (2016). The causes of the Roman civil war, 49 B.C.: Julia and Crassus. Grani, 19(4), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.15421/1716090
Section
HISTORY