Retrospective and modern views on modernization and alternative modernization components of shinto and zen buddhism
AbstractThe article is devoted to the ratio of modernization and counter modernizing key components of Japan and religions (partly) introduced Christianity. The author concludes that the various components of the religious consciousness of the Japanese were kontratetycal on two main elements that form the basis of modern Western culture Japanese resistance and cause upgrade. First, science and technology, working on the basis of the laws of nature, which are opposed to the supernatural and the metaphysical world. Secondly, expressed individualism and atomism as hypertrophic respect for the human person, liberal nadzoseredzhenist to a person who undermines the consolidation of corporate social society. Japanese culture in the past was oriented toward modernization, but progress has been very slow. Moreover, in this process, Japan was much more conservative because in Japanese society regulatory institutions of the army, religion and industrial corporations can be considered a kind of constants which not only can be adapted to the modernization of Euro-American style, as suggested selection of authentic script compatible, especially with life values corporatism and solidarity. It is in this dimension of modernization projects related to Christian proselytism, as were «frustrated.» The reason for this breakdown can be considered inherence religion with social cohesion, its actual merging of social institutions, as well as hidden mahizm skepticism and religious outlook that combines Shinto, Confucian and Zen Buddhist elements. Since modernization in Christianity included the distinction darkened minds clerical era and «enlightened enlightenment» of consciousness era of modern times, it is this dichotomy allowed to oppose religious «ignorance» and scientific «enlightenment», the clergy and secular intellectuals, universities and intellectual clubs as a medium spreading the ideology of the bourgeoisie and monasteries as centers of religious clericalism. For Japanese Buddhism, this dichotomy remains irrelevant, since in this religious system as, by the way, Shintoism, no opposition secular / social and religious rationality, which means no distinction between intellectuals, clergy and social stratum administrators who form a social cluster higher death and rationality are the bearers of traditional Weber.
Benedikt, R., 2004. Hrizantema i mech: modeli yaponskoy kulturyi [Chrysanthemum and the Sword: Japanese culture model]. Nauka, SPb. (in Russian).
Polyakov, L.V., 1997. Metodologiya issledovaniya rossiyskoy modernizatsii [Research Methodology of Russian modernization]. Politicheskie issledovaniya 3, 7-16 (in Russian).
Romanenko, Yu.V., 2006. Smisloprodukuvannya v sotsIalnih sistemah [Smysloprodukuvannya social systems]. Vid-vo E ta E, Kyiv (in Russian).
Habito, R., 1996. Tendai Hongaku Doctrine and Japanese Buddhism / Studia Philologica Buddhica. Occasional Paper Series. XI. Tokyo, 77-97
Smith, T. C., 1988. Native sources of Japanese industrialization. 1750-1920. Berkeley, Los Angeles: Univ. of California press, 133-145
Teeuwen, M., 2003. Buddhas and Kami in Japan: Honji Suijaku as Combinatory Paradigm / Mark Teeuwen, Fabio Rambelli. London: Routledge
Teeuwen, M., 1996. Watarai Shinto. An Intellectual History of the Outer Shrine in Ise / M. Teeuwen. Leiden: Research School CNWS
The Third International Symposium of the International Shinto Foundation. «Shape of Religion in the 21st Century In Search of World Со-existence». Tokyo: International Shinto Foundation, 1997
Earhart, H., 1994. Byron. Nihon syu:ke: no sekay (Mir yaponskih religiy) [Nihon B: ke: but Sekai (World of Japanese Religions)]. Syusebo, Osaka
Yamazaki, Masakazu. Individualism and the Japanese. And alternative approach to cultural comparison. Japan echo, 1994.-344 р.