Methodological aspect of research of the process of socialization in media-cultural space of information society
Keywords:
social philosophy, methodology, medіa cultural space, spiritual culture, socialization, personality, social development
Abstract
Integrated within the social and philosophical discourse interdisciplinary methodology, based on the classic philosophical methodology for the analysis of socio-cultural phenomena enables a holistic understanding of the studied phenomenon. From a methodological point of view it is important to determine the social and philosophical understanding of the impact medіa cultural space of personality in conditions of dynamically changing socio-cultural environment. important social and philosophical methodological guideline should be considered on a thesis constant presence in the media culture of human space as being due to the fact that man is a social being, and the information society without media culture as its attribute exists. Philosophical «core» study of the spiritual culture of youth is humanism in its broadest sense, that is, understanding of the studied phenomenon primarily as a multi-dimensional culturing of human values. Submission materialistic determinant factors medіa cultural spiritual space is only possible under the dominance of humanistic values. With all the variety to understanding the spiritual dimension of the relationship of the individual with the socio-cultural environment common dominant philosophical idea of guidelines is the recognition of the spiritual and cultural autonomy rights. Globalization and its associated civilization and processes are seen as foreign in relation to social rights, while the internal spiritual content is cultural processes. Anthropological oriented cultural space of socialization based on interpersonal cultural interaction that produces unique and distinctive personality.References
1. Hakobyan, K., 2002. Kulturav globaliziruyuschemsya mire [Culture in a globalizing world]. Bezopasnost Evrazii (in Russian).
2. Baydarov, E.W., 2011. Kultura kak duhovnaya substantsiya bytiya cheloveka i sotsiuma v usloviyah globalizatsii [Culture as a spiritual substance of human life and society in the context of globalization]. Voprosy kulturologii (in Russian).
3. Belyaevа, V.A., Petrenko, A.A., 2013. Model duhovnonravstvennogo vospitaniya studencheskoy molodezhi v nauchno obrazovatelnom tsentre duhovnonravstvennoy kultury i vospitaniya vuza [The model of spiritual and moral education of students in the scientific educational center of spiritual moral culture and education in institution]. Gumanitary: aktualnye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya 2 [22], 114 (in Russian).
4. Goloskok, Y.N., 2009. Kultura kak faktor duhovnogo bytiya cheloveka [Culture as a factor in the spiritual life of man]. Aktualnye voprosy sovremennoy nauki 63, 203208 (in Russian).
5. Husserl, E., 1994. Idei k chistoy fenomenologii. Prolegomeny k chistoy logike [Ideas to pure phenomenology. V.1. Prolegomena to pure logic]. Gnosis, Moscow (in Russian).
6. Otyutsky, G.P., 2011. Globalizatsiya: tsennosti kultury i duhovnaya bezopasnost [Globalization: cultural values and spiritual security]. Sistema tsennostey sovremennogo obschestva 18, 251255 (in Russian).
7. Pogorily, A., 2008. Filosofiya u konteksti duhovnoho zhyttya [The philosophy in the context of spiritual life], Visnyk Kyyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. Tarasa Shevchenka. Filosofiya.Politolohiya 8990, 9497. (in Ukrainian).
8. Scheler, M., 1994. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected Works], Gnosis, Moscow (in Russian).
2. Baydarov, E.W., 2011. Kultura kak duhovnaya substantsiya bytiya cheloveka i sotsiuma v usloviyah globalizatsii [Culture as a spiritual substance of human life and society in the context of globalization]. Voprosy kulturologii (in Russian).
3. Belyaevа, V.A., Petrenko, A.A., 2013. Model duhovnonravstvennogo vospitaniya studencheskoy molodezhi v nauchno obrazovatelnom tsentre duhovnonravstvennoy kultury i vospitaniya vuza [The model of spiritual and moral education of students in the scientific educational center of spiritual moral culture and education in institution]. Gumanitary: aktualnye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya 2 [22], 114 (in Russian).
4. Goloskok, Y.N., 2009. Kultura kak faktor duhovnogo bytiya cheloveka [Culture as a factor in the spiritual life of man]. Aktualnye voprosy sovremennoy nauki 63, 203208 (in Russian).
5. Husserl, E., 1994. Idei k chistoy fenomenologii. Prolegomeny k chistoy logike [Ideas to pure phenomenology. V.1. Prolegomena to pure logic]. Gnosis, Moscow (in Russian).
6. Otyutsky, G.P., 2011. Globalizatsiya: tsennosti kultury i duhovnaya bezopasnost [Globalization: cultural values and spiritual security]. Sistema tsennostey sovremennogo obschestva 18, 251255 (in Russian).
7. Pogorily, A., 2008. Filosofiya u konteksti duhovnoho zhyttya [The philosophy in the context of spiritual life], Visnyk Kyyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. Tarasa Shevchenka. Filosofiya.Politolohiya 8990, 9497. (in Ukrainian).
8. Scheler, M., 1994. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected Works], Gnosis, Moscow (in Russian).
Published
2016-03-02
How to Cite
Hirlina, N. (2016). Methodological aspect of research of the process of socialization in media-cultural space of information society. Grani, 19(4), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.15421/1716071
Issue
Section
PHILOSOPHY
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
When reporting experiments on human subjects, authors should indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, the authors must explain the rationale for their approach, and demonstrate that the institutional review body explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. When reporting experiments on animals, authors should be asked to indicate whether the institutional and national guide for the care and use of laboratory animals was followed.
When reporting experiments on human subjects, authors should indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, the authors must explain the rationale for their approach, and demonstrate that the institutional review body explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. When reporting experiments on animals, authors should be asked to indicate whether the institutional and national guide for the care and use of laboratory animals was followed.
