The role of the subjective in the transcendence in aesthetics
AbstractThe author analyses the problem of connection of different categories of several fields of knowledge in particular transcendency and aesthetics. The aim of the article is to show the connection of philosophical categories through the concrete which take place in reality, in this case in the reality of human mental processes. The problem of communication categories of different fields of knowledge. In particular, the aesthetics, and transcendence. The article aims to show the relationship of philosophical categories through the specifics of processes that occur in reality. In this case, the reality of mental processes of man. Philosophical categories such as aesthetics, aesthetic transcendence are qualified in specific mental state, as an everyday state of consciousness and altered states of consciousness. It is conditions such trance, inspiration, insight, intuitive insight. Formulation of the problem boils down to show the relationship of philosophical categories process of being realities through processes, in particular through the processes of mental life. Analysis of recent research and publications showed the emerging relationship of such mental processes as creativity and trans in the works B.M. Teplova the heat. Singling out the outstanding part of the overall problem before it becomes necessary to relate mental processes actually existing philosophical categories such as aesthetics and transcendence. The purpose of the article and the statement of the problems come down to tie the mental processes actually exist in humans with the philosophical categories of different areas of knowledge, in particular to link aesthetics and transcendence. Upon a closer view to mysticism we discovered. It is a symbol of death. But the point is that such death has a symbolic character and means the destruction of the mind structures which are outdated. Nowadays, a certain type of the human civilization exists. Destructive activity of individuals is being bom. Man competes not only with his like, he competes with all that is around, competes even with himself. For this harmonizing platform is required;the platform which is directed to the harmonic (careful) attitude of the nature, harmonizing Man’s state of mind.
Averintsev, S.S., 2010. Mistika [Mystic]. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya. Vol. 2. Myisl, Moscow (in Russian).
Bekk, R.M., 1995. Kosmicheskoe soznanie [Cosmic consciousness]. Kosmicheskoe soznanie. OOO «NIK», «Odissey», Moscow (in Russian).
Veydle, V.V., 2007. Umiranie iskusstva. Razmyishlenie o sudbe literaturnogo i hudozhe-stvennogo tvorchestva [Dying art. Thinking about the fate of the literary and artistic creativity-governmental]. Estetika i teoriya iskusstva ХХ veka. Progress-Traditsiya, Moscow (in Russian).
Ginzburg, L.Ya., 1997. O lirike [About the lyrics]. Intrada, Moscow (in Russian).
Gubanov, O.A., Byichkov, V.V., Mankovskaya, N.B., Ivanov, V.V., 2013. Ot trialoga k «esteticheskoy kastalii», k virtualnomu polilogu [From trialogue to «aesthetic Castalia», the virtual Polylog]. Progress-Traditsiya, Moscow (in Russian).
Dzhems, V., 1993. Mnogoobrazie religioznogo opyita [Varieties of Religious Experience]. Andreev i syinovya, SPb. (in Russian).
Dyufren, M., 2007. Vklad estetiki v filosofiyu [The contribution to the philosophy of aesthetics]. Estetika i teoriya iskus-stva ХХ veka. Progress-Traditsiya, Moscow (in Russian).
Zabiyako, A.P., 2009. Trans [Trance]. Entsiklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki. «Kanon» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», Moscow (in Russian).
Kolomiets, G.G., 2010. Filosofiya muzyiki kak oblast esteticheskogo znaniya: gnoseologiche-skiy aspekt [The philosophy of music as aesthetic knowledge gnoseologiche-sky aspect]. Granitsyi sovremennoy estetiki i novyie strategii interpre-tatsii iskusstva. Materialyi IV Ovsyannikovskoy mezhdunarodnoy esteticheskoy konferentsii. MGU imeni M.V. Lomonosova, 23-24.11. 2010. Sbornik nauchnyih dokladov. MIEE, Moscow (in Russian).
Krishnamurti, D., 1999. Zapisnyie knizhki [Notebooks]. Razum, Moscow (in Russian).
Losev, A.F., 1980. Istoriya antichnoy filosofii. Pozdniy ellinizm [History of ancient philosophy. Late Hellenism]. Iskusstvo, Moscow (in Russian).
Murashkin, M.G., 2006. Zapisi 2000 goda [Records 2000]. SICh, Dnipropetrovsk (in Russian).
Papadzhi, 2004. Den, kogda ya uydu, nikogda ne nastanet [The day when I’m gone, will never come]. ID «Ganga», Moscow (in Russian).
Teplov, B.M., 1985. Konspektyi i kommentarii k knige A.Anastazi «Differentsialnaya psihologiya» [Summaries and commentary on the Book A.Anastazi «Differential Psychology»]. Izbrannyie trudyi. Pedagogika, Moscow (in Russian).
Chzhan Chzhen-Tszyi, 1993. Praktika Dzen [The practice of Zen]. «Belyiy ost-rov», Krasnoyarsk (in Russian).
Shestakov, V.P., 1983. Esteticheskie kategorii: Opyit sistematicheskogo i istoricheskogo issledovaniya [Aesthetic category: Previous systematic and historical research]. Iskusstvo, Moscow (in Russian).
Yaspers, K., 1997. Obschaya psihopatologiya [General Psychopathology]. Praktika, Moscow (in Russian).