Features of modern security policy UK political parties


  • A. V. Stalovierova National university of water management and nature resources use
Keywords: UK, Great Britain, Cameron government, security, NATO, EU, political party

Abstract

The security policy of the British coalition government of D. Cameron (2010-2015) is summarized; it’s been proved that political forces of Tory and Liberal Democrat should have compromised to carry out unanimous course in the scope of national security, and the problems of the security strategy on parliamentary elections in 2015 are analyzed, particularly the comparative analysis of the modern safety strategy of leading British parties is exercised. Under conditions of the appearance of new challenges and threats, transformation of international safety system, the questions of safety policy often become the object of attention of the British community and experts. The absence of cross-party consensus on most terms of safety strategy of the United Kingdom during the election campaign in 2015 makes the discussion about perspectives of the British safety policy still more urgent. During the election campaign there was no unity on any aspect of security subject between parties. First of all, Labourists, Liberal Democrats, Scottish National Party and Green Party made a statement about readiness to develop cooperation with the EU and the Conservatives and the UK Independence Party were on the side of the Eurosceptics. The opinions of the parties were also divided on military operations abroad, financing and force level. In terms of one-party government and presence of majority in the House of Commons, the Conservatives have opportunities to realize their own vision of British safety policy.

Author Biography

A. V. Stalovierova, National university of water management and nature resources use
PhD in historical science, associate professor

References

1. Dilemmyi Britanii. Poisk putey razvitiya (Dilemmas Britain. Search of ways). - M.: Ves mir, 2014. - 459 р.
2. Koalitsionnoe pravitelstvo Velikobritanii - god posle vyiborov: dokladyi Instituta Evropyi (Britain’s coalition government - a year after the election: reports of the Institute of Europe). - M.: Russkiy suvenir, 2011. - 179 р.
3. Yakovenko N.L. «Osoblyvi vidnosyny» yak vyznachal’nyy faktor brytans’koyi roli v Pivnichnoatlantychnomu al’yansi («Special relationship» as a determinant of the British role in the North Atlantic Alliance) / Aktual’ni problemy mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn, 2012. – Vyp. 3 (Part 1). – Р. 12-23.
4. A Strong Britain in an Age of Uncertainty: The National Security Strategy
5. Armed Forces Redundancies. Standard Note SN/0591 // House of Commons Library: L., 2014.
6. Biscop S. The UK and European Defence: Leading or Leaving? // International Affairs, 2012. - Vol. 88. - P. 1297-1313.
7. Chalmers H. Towards the UK’s Nuclear Century // The RUSI Journal. 2013. - № 6.
8. Cottey A. Security in 21st Century Europe. L.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. - 310 p.
9. Invitation to Join the Government of Britain
10. Kirkup J. Navy Chief: Britain Cannot Keep up Its Role in Libya Air War Due to Cuts // The Telegraph, 2011. - 20 June.
11. Military Operations in Libya. Standard Note SN/IA/5909 // House of Commons Library. - L., 2011.
12. Richards J. A Guide to National Security. Threats, Responses, and Strategies. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. - 182 p.
13. Securing Britain in an Age of Uncertainty: The Strategic Defence and Security Review [Electronic resource].
14. SIPRI Military Expenditure Database http://www.sipri.org/research/armaments/milex/milex_database
15. Troop Numbers and Contributions [Electronic resource].
Published
2015-12-28
How to Cite
Stalovierova, A. (2015). Features of modern security policy UK political parties. Grani, 19(1), 128-132. https://doi.org/10.15421/1716023
Section
HISTORY