Formation of culture public trust: educational dimension


  • N. I. Glebova Melitopol Bohdan Khmelnytsky state pedagogical university
Keywords: public trust, a public institution, the education system, college education, pedagogical practice, market culture, the culture of trust

Abstract

In the article the socio-cultural mission of education as a factor in the formation of social cohesion, consolidation of Ukrainian civil society in the context of ambiguous impact of market relations in the ideological orientation and life of modern man. Analyzes modern theoretical concepts of public trust as a model of rationalization of human relationships, social behavior, social community of subjects achieving social development and achieving sustainable social order. The role of education as integrating components of spiritual culture of modern society and a means of realizing the potential of the individual on the basis of social mutual aid. Tracked socio-historical specificity of interdisciplinary models use educational means avoiding excessive social tension and play culture of public trust in terms of value transformation of modern Ukrainian society and the risks associated with a deficit market culture affecting all levels of human consciousness, knowledge, experience, skills. Substantiated pedagogical practices need to involve the formation of social trust as determined system of social relations that allows you to install and ensure the quality of social relations based on effective use of social capital, which is education. Identify the factors shaping educational atmosphere of trust in society as a means of empowering the individual abilities of its full adaptation to the rules of formation of market relations and market culture personalities as fuse imbalance of public confidence in the Ukrainian society. We consider the basic principles of the Institute of Education as an educational and practical social laboratory of formation, consolidation, restoration and regulation of productive forms of relations between members of society through the development of effective samples, standards and models of social behavior and its effect on the mechanisms of role-playing patterns of the individual in society at basis to ensure cohesion, interdependence and updated conformity members of Ukrainian society.

Author Biography

N. I. Glebova, Melitopol Bohdan Khmelnytsky state pedagogical university
PhD in sociology, associate professor

References

1. Veber M. Pro dejaki kategorii sociologii rozuminnja (Some categories of Humanistic sociology), Kyiv. 1998, pp. 104-156.
2. D’ui D. Demokratija i osvita (Democracy and education). Lvov, 2003. 294 p.
3. Durkheim E. Sociologija obrazovanija (Sociology of education). Moscow, 1996. 340 p.
4. Zubov V. Kroskulturniy pastish v umovach globalizazii (Cross-cultural paste in the context of globalization, ideological aspect). Kyiv, 2014. 278 p.
5. Zubok U. Teoreticheskie i prikladnye problemy socialnogo razvitija molodezhi v obchesnve riska (Theoretical and applied problems of social development of young people in a risk society). Safety Evrazyy, 2003, № 3,
pp. 124-143.
6. Krivega L. D. Rinkovy svіtoglyad: zmіst i tsіnnostі (Market outlook: the content and the value) Regime to access: http://www.confcontact.com/20101224/1_krivega.php.
7. Krymska S. B. Tsivіlіzatsіyny rozvitok lyudstva (Civilization Human Development). Kyiv, 2007. 316 p.
8. Luman N. Obschestvo obschestva. Chast I. Obschestvo kak socialnaja sistema. (Society. Part I. Society as a social system). Moscow, 2004. 232 p.
9. Oksamitnaja C. Novye tendencji vosproizvodstva tradicionnogo neravenstva. (Education: New Trends traditional reproduction of inequality). Kyiv, 2006, pp. 116-147.
10. Pozdnyakova Kirbyat’eva E. G. Tsіnnіsnі dispozitsії uchnіv v kontekstі sotsіokulturnoї diferentsіatsії osvіty. - Abstract disertatsії na zdobuttya naukovogo stupenja candidata sotsіologіchnyh nauk za spetsіalnіstyu 22.00.04 -Spetsіalnі ta galuzevі sotsіologії (Value disposition of the students in the context of socio-cultural education differentiation) Gumanіtarny unіversitet «Zaporіzky іnstitut government and munіcipal management», Zaporizhzhya, 2007.
11. Patnam R. Tvorenie demokratії: traditsії gromadyanskoї aktivnostі v suchasnіy Іtalії (Creation democracy tradition of social activity in modern Italy). Kyiv, 2001. 302 p.
12. Sagaidak A. Dystantsija vlasti po-ukrainski (Distance of government in Ukraine), Information and analytical magazine, 2005, № 5 (14), pp. 24-29.
13. Seligman A. Problema doverija (The problem of trust). Moscow, 2002. 256 p.
14. Tonnies F. Obschnost i obschestvo (Community and society). Theoretical Sociology: Anthology. Moscow, 2002, Part 1, pp. 216–248.
15. Troitska T. S. Fіlosofska metodologіya yak chinnik modernіzatsії profesіynoї pіdgotovky pedagoga: monograph (Philosophical methodology as a factor in the modernization of teacher training: monograms). Simferopol, 2006. 268 p.
16. Fukuyama F. Doverye (Trust). Moscow, 2008. 730 p.
17. Sheregi F. E. Sociologija obrazovanija: prikladnoj aspect (Sociology of education: applied aspect). Moscow, 1997. 301 p.
18. Sztompka P. Sociologija socialnyh izmenenij (Sociology of social change). Moscow, 1996. 223 p.
19. Bourdieu P. La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement, Paris: Minuit, 1979.
20. Parsons T. School class as a Social System / Parsons T. // Harvard educational review. – 1959. – Vol. 29. – № 4. – P. 297-313.
21. Schultz T.W. The investment in human capital / T.W. Schultz // American Economic Review. № 51. March, 1961. – P. 1-11.
Published
2015-12-25
How to Cite
Glebova, N. (2015). Formation of culture public trust: educational dimension. Grani, 19(1), 92-98. https://doi.org/10.15421/1716017
Section
SOCIOLOGY