Strategies of institutional minimization of the impact of political familism on the political process in Ukraine


  • A. S. Sambros V. N. Karazin Kharkiv national university
Keywords: political familizm, corruption, anti-corruption policy, reforms, Singapore, Georgia, political will, legislation

Abstract

This article analyzes the typical effects of the impact of political familizm on the political process in Ukraine. It is concluded that in general the essence of this phenomenon is negative. Therefore, in order to highlight examples of effective anti-familistic strategiesthe paper studies the existing international experience – from public documents such UN Convention against corruption to examples of specific states. The subject of the current research is the policy of states, which are considered as global (Singapore) and regional (Georgia) samples of the anti-familistic movement. We analyze the historical path of these countries – from the critical development of political familizm to the successful anti-familistic reforms with their subsequent consolidation of the institutional body of state. Accordingly, the research defines the possibility and the expected effectiveness of implementation of existing examples of institutional minimizationof political familizm in Ukrainian political realities basing on the advantages and disadvantages of current anti-familistic methods. The paperalso analyzes the expected impact of the Law of Ukraine regarding the public funding of political parties as one of the possible means of minimization of political familizm.

Author Biography

A. S. Sambros, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv national university
postgraduate

References

1. Borba s korruptsyeipo-hruzynsky: metod «shokovoi terapyy» (Fighting against corruption in Georgian: the method of «shock therapy»).TASS, 2012. Regime to access: http://tass.ru/arhiv/659270.
2. VR zaprovadyla derzhavne finansuvannia partii i yikhniu zvitnist (Parliament introduced state funding of parties and their reporting).Ukrainska pravda, 2015. Regime to access: http://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2015/10/8/7084187.
3. Konventsiia Orhanizatsii Obiednanykh Natsii proty koruptsii (United Nations Convention against Corruption).2003. Regime to access: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_c16.
4. Mazhor, yakyi zbyv dvokh liudei na trotuari, vidkupyvsia vid slidchykh (Major, who shot down two people on the sidewalk, bought off by investigators). TSN, 2012. Regime to access: http://tsn.ua/ukrayina/mazhor-yakiy-zbiv-dvoh-lyudey-na-trotuari-vidkupivsya-vid-slidchih.html.
5. Manzullin R. Eduard Shevarnadze: neudobnyie faktyi (Eduard Shevardnadze: inconvenient facts).Argumentyi i Faktyi, 1999. Regime to access: http://www.compromat.ru/page_9406.htm.
6. Reyting stran mira po urovnyu vospriyatiya korruptsii (Ranking of countries in terms of corruption perception). Tsentr gumanitarnyih tehnologiy, 2014. Regime to access: http://gtmarket.ru/ratings/corruption-perceptions-index/info
7. Rykhlitskyi V. Za kradizhku kholodylnyka u teshchi cholovika posadyly u viaznytsiu maizhe na 4 roky (stealing refrigerator at mother-in-law son-in-law was jailed for almost four years). zaxid.net., 2014.
8. Rodkin A. Kto takie gruzinskie voryi v zakone? (Who are the Georgian thieves-in-law?). OSP-UA.info., 2015. Regime to access: http://osp-ua.info/comments/46836-kto-takie-gruzinskie-vory-v-zakone.html.
9. Saakashvili: «Singapur i Estoniya yavlyayutsya primerom dlya Gruzii» (Saakashvili: «Singapore and Estonia are an example for Georgia»).Civil.ge., 2011. Regime to access: http://www.civil.ge/rus/article.php?id=21635.
10. Sirotin A. Opyit borbyi s korruptsiey v Singapure (Experience in the struggle against corruption in Singapore). Sudanet, 2009. Regime to access: http://sudanet.ru/borba_s_corrupciei_v_singapure.
11. Try roky viaznytsi zahrozhuie divchyni za kradizhku irzhavoho velosypeda (Three years in prison for theft threatens girl rusty bike). TSN, 2012. Regime to access: http://tsn.ua/ukrayina/tri-roki-v-yaznici-zagrozhuye-divchini-za-kradizhku-irzhavogo-velosipeda.html
Published
2015-12-21
How to Cite
Sambros, A. (2015). Strategies of institutional minimization of the impact of political familism on the political process in Ukraine. Grani, 19(1), 53-58. https://doi.org/10.15421/1716009
Section
POLITICAL SCIENCE