Features of ethnopolitical development of the population of the Russia-dependent Ukraine at the ХІХ - ХХ centuries
Keywords:
socioethnic composition, the population of the Russiadependent Ukraine, population dynamics, host nation, ethnical selfconsciousness
Abstract
The given article determines the features of ethnopolitical development of Russiadependent Ukraine population. It was established at the end of the nineteenth century Ukrainians in their numerical composition were one of the most numerous among the European ones. Especially rapid during the nineteenth century were the rates of growth on the Ukrainian lands that were the part of the Russian Empire. According to the materials of the First General census of the Russian Empire in 1897 and the other data, there were about 26.4 million of Ukrainians in the world. Among them, 22 380,6 thousand of people (84,46%) lived in Russia and 3 814,9 thousand of people (14,40%) lived in AustriaHungary. Only about 215 thousand (less than 1%) resided outside of the borders of both empires. The article deals with the changes in the numerical composition and settlement both of Ukrainians and nonUkrainians in these countries. Besides, there was given the characteristic of the population of Ukraine with glance of its significant differences due to political and economic factors associated with the spread of mass ethnical identity, the revival and the rise of the national movement, the creation of a new Ukrainian culture, the development of all branches of life. So, according to their territorial distribution and numerical composition, the Ukrainians were the leading nation among the population of the national minorities within the Russian empire. Except for the basic constituents, inherent to every nation, Ukrainians possessed their own literary language, centuriesold traditions, and their own intelligentsia.References
1.Vseobschaya perepis naseleniya Rossiyskoy imperii 1897 g. SPb.: Tip. Tovarischestva «Narodnaya polza», 1905 (The general census of the population of the Russian Empire in 1897). Vol. 48. Р. 37. http://elib.shpl.ru/ru/nodes/12632pervayavseobschayaperepisnaseleniyarossiyskoyimperii1897godaspb18971905
2.Hrytsak Ya. Narys istoriyi Ukrayiny.Formuvannya modernoyi ukrayins’koyi natsiyi ХIХ–ХХ stolittya (Essay on the history of Ukraine.The formation of the modern Ukrainian nation nineteenth and twentieth centuries). – K.: Vyshcha shkola, 1996. – 245 р.
3.Danyl’chenko O. Etnichni hrupy pivdnya Ukrayiny ekonomichne ta sotsial’no politychne stanovyshche na poch. 20kh rr. XX st. (Ethnic group South Ukraine economic and sociopolitical situation in the beginning. 20ies.XX century). K., 1993. 58 р.
4.Ischislenie naseleniya g. Harkova i ego prigorodov 10 maya 1916 g.(Calculation of the population of Kharkov and its suburbs 10 May 1916). H.: Tip.Lit. P. D. Kalugina, 1916. 143 р. http://library.univer.kharkov.ua/OpacUnicode/index.php?url=/notices
5.Ivanyuk O. Etnichnyy sklad naselennya mist Ukrayiny naprykintsi ХIХ st.: stan i perspektyvy problemy (Ethnicity cities of Ukraine in the late nineteenth century .: the state and prospects of the problem). – Access mode: http://www.archives.gov.ua/Publicat/Studii/Studii_2004.11_11.php
6.Istoriya derzhavnosti Ukrayiny. Eksperymental’nyy pidruchnyk (The history of statehood Ukraine.Experimental tutorial). Kharkiv: TOV «Odissey», 2004. – 607 р.
7.Istoriya Kyyeva. V 3kh t. 4kh kn. (History of Kyiv.In 3 vol. 4 Vol). K.: Nauk. dumka. Vol. 2. 438 р.; Entsiklopedicheskiy spravochnik. K.: Glavnaya redaktsiya USE, 1985. 759 р.
8.Korotkyy dovidnyk z istoriyi Ukrayiny (Quick Reference history of Ukraine). K.: Vyshcha shkola, 1994. 255р.
9.Kulynych I., Kryvets’ N. Narysy z istoriyi nimets’kykh koloniy v Ukrayini. (Essays on the history of German colonies in Ukraine). K.: NAN Ukrayiny, Instytut istoriyi NAN Ukrayiny, 1995. 271 р.
10.Lichkov L. YugoZapadnyiy kray po dannyim perepisi 1897 goda (Southwest Region according to the 1897 census) // Kievskaya starina. Tip.Imperatorskogo Universiteta sv. Vladimira, Aktsion. ova pechati i izdatelskogo dela N. T. KorchakNovitskogo, 1905. Vol. XS. № 9. Р. 317366.
11.Makarchuk S. Etnohrafiya Ukrayiny (Ethnic Ukraine). – L’viv: Svit, 2004. 465 р. – Access mode: http://www.ebk.net.ua/Book/history/makarchuk_eu/part4/401.htm
12.Petrovs’kyy V., Radchenko L., Semenenko V. Istoriya Ukrayiny: Neuperedzhenyy pohlyad: Fakty. Mify. Komentari (History of Ukraine: An unbiased view: Facts. Myths.Comments.). – Vyd. 2he, vypr.ta dop. – Kh.: VD «Shkola», 2008. – 608 р.
13.Ukrayina: khronolohiya rozvytku (Ukraine: Chronology of development.). – K.: KRION, 2011. – Impers’ka doba 18001917rr. – Vol. 5. 720 р.
2.Hrytsak Ya. Narys istoriyi Ukrayiny.Formuvannya modernoyi ukrayins’koyi natsiyi ХIХ–ХХ stolittya (Essay on the history of Ukraine.The formation of the modern Ukrainian nation nineteenth and twentieth centuries). – K.: Vyshcha shkola, 1996. – 245 р.
3.Danyl’chenko O. Etnichni hrupy pivdnya Ukrayiny ekonomichne ta sotsial’no politychne stanovyshche na poch. 20kh rr. XX st. (Ethnic group South Ukraine economic and sociopolitical situation in the beginning. 20ies.XX century). K., 1993. 58 р.
4.Ischislenie naseleniya g. Harkova i ego prigorodov 10 maya 1916 g.(Calculation of the population of Kharkov and its suburbs 10 May 1916). H.: Tip.Lit. P. D. Kalugina, 1916. 143 р. http://library.univer.kharkov.ua/OpacUnicode/index.php?url=/notices
5.Ivanyuk O. Etnichnyy sklad naselennya mist Ukrayiny naprykintsi ХIХ st.: stan i perspektyvy problemy (Ethnicity cities of Ukraine in the late nineteenth century .: the state and prospects of the problem). – Access mode: http://www.archives.gov.ua/Publicat/Studii/Studii_2004.11_11.php
6.Istoriya derzhavnosti Ukrayiny. Eksperymental’nyy pidruchnyk (The history of statehood Ukraine.Experimental tutorial). Kharkiv: TOV «Odissey», 2004. – 607 р.
7.Istoriya Kyyeva. V 3kh t. 4kh kn. (History of Kyiv.In 3 vol. 4 Vol). K.: Nauk. dumka. Vol. 2. 438 р.; Entsiklopedicheskiy spravochnik. K.: Glavnaya redaktsiya USE, 1985. 759 р.
8.Korotkyy dovidnyk z istoriyi Ukrayiny (Quick Reference history of Ukraine). K.: Vyshcha shkola, 1994. 255р.
9.Kulynych I., Kryvets’ N. Narysy z istoriyi nimets’kykh koloniy v Ukrayini. (Essays on the history of German colonies in Ukraine). K.: NAN Ukrayiny, Instytut istoriyi NAN Ukrayiny, 1995. 271 р.
10.Lichkov L. YugoZapadnyiy kray po dannyim perepisi 1897 goda (Southwest Region according to the 1897 census) // Kievskaya starina. Tip.Imperatorskogo Universiteta sv. Vladimira, Aktsion. ova pechati i izdatelskogo dela N. T. KorchakNovitskogo, 1905. Vol. XS. № 9. Р. 317366.
11.Makarchuk S. Etnohrafiya Ukrayiny (Ethnic Ukraine). – L’viv: Svit, 2004. 465 р. – Access mode: http://www.ebk.net.ua/Book/history/makarchuk_eu/part4/401.htm
12.Petrovs’kyy V., Radchenko L., Semenenko V. Istoriya Ukrayiny: Neuperedzhenyy pohlyad: Fakty. Mify. Komentari (History of Ukraine: An unbiased view: Facts. Myths.Comments.). – Vyd. 2he, vypr.ta dop. – Kh.: VD «Shkola», 2008. – 608 р.
13.Ukrayina: khronolohiya rozvytku (Ukraine: Chronology of development.). – K.: KRION, 2011. – Impers’ka doba 18001917rr. – Vol. 5. 720 р.
Published
2015-07-21
How to Cite
Zborets, S., & Lebedeva, H. (2015). Features of ethnopolitical development of the population of the Russia-dependent Ukraine at the ХІХ - ХХ centuries. Grani, 18(9), 91-95. https://doi.org/10.15421/1715182
Issue
Section
HISTORY
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
When reporting experiments on human subjects, authors should indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, the authors must explain the rationale for their approach, and demonstrate that the institutional review body explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. When reporting experiments on animals, authors should be asked to indicate whether the institutional and national guide for the care and use of laboratory animals was followed.
When reporting experiments on human subjects, authors should indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, the authors must explain the rationale for their approach, and demonstrate that the institutional review body explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. When reporting experiments on animals, authors should be asked to indicate whether the institutional and national guide for the care and use of laboratory animals was followed.
