Intergovernmental approach of the new liberalism in the development of integration processes
AbstractInvestigated intergovernmental theory approach to understanding the new liberalism integration processes. Determined the nature of the liberal intergovernmental approach that Andrew Moravchik developed within the new liberalism. Emphasized that the intergovernmental approach of the new liberalism theory considers national preferences in international relations as being primarily determined by domestic political processes. Liberal intergovernmental approach rejects the rhetoric of socalled national interests and instead focuses on interest groups that define a specific government policy regarding foreign partners. Specified on crucial economic lobbying pressure defined interest groups in the formation of national preferences. The features considering interest groups that determine foreign policy under the intergovernmental approach a theory of new liberalism. Singled out a number of critical approaches to the liberal intergovernmental approach given the nature explanation integration processes. Clarified the value of the intergovernmental approach within theories of political integration by taking into account the theoretical and conceptual foundations of his liberal variety liberal intergovernmental approach as part of a new theory of liberalism, which involves the formation of national preferences in international relations through domestic contexts interaction of national interest groups and their lobbying pressure.
Avramenko, Maksym. Analiz kontseptualnykh polozhen` mizhuryadovoho pidkhodu do yevropeyskoyi intehratsiyi. (Conceptual analysis of the provisions of the intergovernmental approach to European integration). Viche: theoretical and socio-political magazine. Kyiv: Parliament of Ukraine. 2010. №12. P.2-4
Galuchko, Kyrylo. Suchasni sotsiolohichni teoriyi yevrointehratsiynoho protsesu. (Modern sociological theory of European integration). International Scientific Forum: sociology, psychology, education, and management. No. 3 : collection of scientific papersю. К.: Publication of NPU of Dragomanov, 2010. P.19-28. [Access]: http://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/182/1/mnf%E2%84%963.pdf
Romanyuk, Nataliya. Klasychnyi mizhuryadovyi pidkhid: osnovni polozhennya ta istorychnyi kontekst. (Classic intergovernmental approach: basic terms and historical context). Journal of , Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. A series of «International Relations». 2008. No. 25. P. 87–88.
Merkel, Wolfgang. Die Europische Integration und das Elend der Theorie. Geschichte und Gesellschaft. 1999. № 25. P. 315.
Milward, Alan. The European Rescue of the Nation-State. Routledge. 2000. 466 p.
Moravcsik, Andrew. Negotiating the Single European Act. National Interest and Conventional Statecraft in the European community. International Organization. 1991. № 45 (1). P. 651-688
Moravcsik, Andrew. Preferences and Power in the European Community. A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies. 1993. № 31 (4). P. 474.
Moravcsik, Andrew. The Choice for Europe. Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. 1998. Р.23-24.
Sandholtz, Wayne/Stone Sweet. Alec European Integration and Supranational Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1998.
Smith M. E. Toward a theory of EU foreign policy making: multi-level governance, domestic politics, and national adaptation to Europe’s common foreign and security policy . Journal of European Public Policy. 2004. № 11 (4). P. 740–758.
Zangl, Bernhard. Der Ansatz der Zwei-Ebenen-Spiele. Eine Brcke zwischen Neoinstitutionalismus und seinen KritikerInnen? Zeitschrift fr Internationale Beziehungen. – Baden-Baden: Nomos. 1999. No. 2. P. 393-416.