States-image: the field of conceptual definitions in social-psychological studies

  • A. O. Pocelujko Institute of sociology NAS of Ukraine
Keywords: image, social perception, character, setting, social stereotypes, fashion design, social expectations

Abstract

The article is devoted to the value of the concept of «image» in his relationship with the concepts of «symbol», «plant», «social stereotype» and others. concepts of sociology, social and political psychology. Image of scientific literature mainly seen in dvoaspektnomu dimension, namely as spontaneous generated image of any object (including the state as an abstract object) and the result of conscious purposeful design, appropriate activities that allow, given appropriate expectations, create one­sided, exaggerated, accented at the level of imagination perception. Recently, through the media and through opinion leaders to be spread through various channels of social communication. The symbol takes on the image of the instrumental function, while the image can serve as a reflection of a large set of symbols with uniform values for different social groups (it is the so­called «axial» or archetype characters). Image of scientific literature mainly seen in dimension, namely as spontaneous generated image of any object (including the state as an abstract object) and the result of conscious purposeful design, appropriate activities that allow, given appropriate expectations, create one­sided, exaggerated, accented at the level of imagination perception. Recently, through the media and through opinion leaders to be spread through various channels of social communication. However, the symbols for fashion design to be stereotyped as mass consciousness tends to simplification (reduction) of any perсeptual constructs. That is why the image of the state should be formed homogeneous set of stereotyped characters, which regularly operate in mass communication helps to perpetuate them in the settings (attitudes) large social groups.

References

Webster International Dictionary // The English Language. 2nd Edition in­quarto. ­ London: Penguin Books, 2002.

Manyakyna Ye.I. Politychnyy lider: protses stvorennya imidzhu (Leader: the process of creating an image). ­ M.: Respublyka, 1994. ­ 62 p.

Frolov P.D. Obraz polityka: bezposerednye ta mediaspryymannya (The image of politics: direct and mediaspryymannya)// Problemy politychnoyi psykholohiyi ta yiyi rol’ u stanovlenni hromadyanyna Ukrayins’koyi derzhavy: DOK­K, 1997.­ 402 p.

AndrEEva G.M. Psihologiya sotsialnogo poznaniya (Psychology of social cognitio). ­ M.:INFRA, 2005. ­ 326 p.

Pocheptsov G. Imidzh: ot faraonov do prezidentov (Image: From Pharaohs to the president). ­ K: «ADEF­UkraYina».­1997. ­328 st.

Politicheskaya reklama (Political advertising). ­ M.: Tsentr politicheskogo konsultirovaniya «Nikkolo M», 1999. ­ 240 p.

Dyakova V.V. Stereotipyi vospriyatiya gosudarstvennogo sluzhaschego (Stereotypes of a public servant // Image of government service) // Imidzh gosudarstvennoy sluzhbyi // Sbornik nauchnyih trudov. ­ M.: «IDF» ­ «SPA ­ Konsalting», 1996. ­ 186 p.

Sotsial’nyy stereotyp u zhyttyediyal’nosti lyudey (Social stereotypes livelihoods)// Filosofiya i suspil’stvo. № 3, 2007.

Lippman. U. Obschestvennoe mnenie (Public opinion). ­ M.: Institut Fonda «Obschestvennoe mnenie», 2004. ­ 384 p.

Uznadze D.N. Obschaya psihologiya (General Psychology)// Smyisl, 2004. ­ 417 p.

Feofanov O. A. Stereotip i imidzh v burzhuaznoy propagande (Stereotype and image in the bourgeois propaganda)// Voprosyi filosofii. ­ №6. 1990 g.

Shkuratov V.I Istoricheskaya psihologiya (Historical psychology). ­ M.: Alta, 1997. ­ 505 p.

Yazyik i modelirovanie sotsialnogo vzaimodeystviya: perevodyi (Language and modeling of social interaction: translations). ­ M.: Progress, 1987,­ 464 p.

T.M. Ryiskova Politicheskiy portret kak metod diagnostiki statusa i vliyatelnosti lidera (Political portrait as a diagnostic method status and influential leaders)// Vestnik MGU. Seriya 12. Politicheskie nauki. № 4. 1996.­ Izdatelstvo MGU

Boulding. K. Obschaya teoriya sistem ­ skelet nauki (General systems theory ­ the skeleton of science)// Issledovaniya po obschey teorii sistem. — M.: Nauka, 1969. ­ 384 p.

Perelyigina E.B. Imidzh kak fenomen intersub’ektnogo vzaimodeystviya: Soderzhanie i puti razvitiya (Image as a phenomenon of intersubjectivity interaction: Content and ways of development).­ Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni doktora psihologicheskih nauk.­ M., 2003. Mode of access: http://www.dissercat.com/content/imidzh­kak­fenomen­intersubektnogo­vzaimodeistviya­soderzhanie­i­puti­razvitiya№ixzz3TE1pdNaL

Kostenko E.P. Akmeologicheskaya kontseptsiya razvitiya imidzha politika. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni doktora psihologicheskih nauk (Akmeologichesky concept of image politics. Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Psychological Science).­ M., 2008. Mode of access: http://www.dissercat.com/content/akmeologicheskaya­kontseptsiya­razvitiya­imidzha­politika

Blumer H. Sociological Implications of the Thought of George Herbert Mead. «American Journal of Sociology», 1966, v.71, N5, p.535­566.

Goffman, E. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor, 1959.

Published
2015-03-03
How to Cite
Pocelujko, A. O. (2015). States-image: the field of conceptual definitions in social-psychological studies. Grani, 18(5), 68-74. https://doi.org/10.15421/1715101
Section
Article