Розкриття потенціалу метакогнітивного підходу до управління в прикордонних дослідженнях
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15421/172460Ключові слова:
прикордонні дослідження, метакогнітивний менеджмент, конфлікти, когнітивні спотворення, ресурси для розбудови мируАнотація
У дослідженні використовується метакогнітивний підхід управління до вивчення кордонів і застосовується до сучасного стану дослідження кордонів. Метакогнітивне управління було розроблено в Кавказькій лабораторії геополітичного моделювання Кавказького міжнародного університету і включає всебічний міждисциплінарний аналіз, виявлення та розуміння когнітивних факторів, що сприяють складності кордонів, а також ефективне використання раніше невикористаних матеріальних і нематеріальних ресурсів. Особлива увага приділяється вивченню психологічного виміру кордонів та розвитку когнітивних підходів, які складають основу процесу метакогнітивного управління. Наголошується на важливості психологічних аспектів у дослідженнях кордонів, підкреслюється важливість таких факторів, як сприйняття, ідентичність, пам'ять, страх та практики іншування, у формуванні динаміки кордонів. У статті розглядаються когнітивні підходи до вивчення кордонів, наголошується, що кордони як конструкти (політичні, соціальні, культурні тощо) є надто складними, щоб їх можна було належним чином проаналізувати та зрозуміти з точки зору окремої дисципліни. У той час як прикордонні дослідження визнаються міждисциплінарними, психологічні аспекти залишаються недостатньо інтегрованими в ці дослідження. Розуміння цих психологічних аспектів дає цінну інформацію про мотивацію поведінки, практики, політики та конфліктів, пов'язані з кордонами. Важливою складовою цього дослідження є взаємозв'язок між кордонами, конфліктами та мирними процесами. Територіальні суперечки, етнічні розбіжності та конкуренція за ресурси часто призводять до прикордонних конфліктів, тоді як кордони також можуть слугувати координаційними центрами для транскордонного співробітництва та ініціатив з розбудови миру. Стаття демонструє тенденцію розглядання кордонів не лише як бар'єрів та обмежень, а дедалі частіше як ресурсів та коридорів можливостей для людей, які проживають у прикордонних регіонах та займаються транскордонною діяльністю та мобільністю.Завантаження
Дані завантаження ще не доступні.
Посилання
Adotey, E. (2020). An imaginary line? Decolonisation, bordering and borderscapes on the Ghana-Togo border. Third World Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2020.1813019
Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso. (Second revised edition, first published in 1983, revised edition in 1991).
Aniszewski, S. (2009). Coordinated Border Management – a concept paper. WCO Research Paper No. 2. World Customs Organization.
Aphijanyatham, R. (2009). A Comparative Analysis of the Different Perceptions of Borders and of the Cost-Benefit Assessment Between the Thai Government, Shan Migrant Workers, Thai Employers and Informal Brokers. In Perceptions of Borders and Human Migration (1–). Institut de recherche sur l’Asie du Sud-Est contemporaine. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.irasec.1068
Association of Borderland Studies. (2024). Retrieved from http://absborderlands.org/
Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.
Brambilla, C., & Jones, R. (2019). Rethinking borders, violence, and conflict: From sovereign power to borderscapes as sites of struggles. EPD: Society and Space, 0(0), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819856352
Brown, B. S. (1983). A new perspective on the political and psychological nature of borders and sovereignty. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 28(8), 625-631. Lecture presented at the 33rd annual meeting of the Canadian Psychiatric Association, Ottawa, Ontario, September 1983.
Brunet-Jailly, E. (2005). Theorizing borders: An interdisciplinary perspective. Geopolitics, 10, 633–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040500318449
Congress of Local Authorities Council of Europe. Retrieved from https://wcd.coe.int/com.instranet.InstraServlet?command=com.instranet.CmdBlobGet&InstranetImage=1716997&SecMode=1&DocId=1479436&Usage=2
Cross Border Cooperation. (2024). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/neighbourhood/cross-border-cooperation_en
Deutsch, M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes. Yale University Press.
Dhungana, R. R., Aryal, N., Adhikary, P., Krishna, R., Regmi, P. R., Devkota, B., Sharma, G. N., Wickramage, K., Teijlingen, E. van, & Simkhada, P. (2019). Psychological morbidity in Nepali cross-border migrants in India: A community based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 19, 1534. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7881-z
Dorokhina, O. (2016). Modern Approaches to Border Management. Academy of Public Administration of Armenia. Conference: International Conference "Problems of Modern Management" (pp. 421-427). Yerevan, Armenia.
Dorokhina, O. (2019). European Experience for Development of Cross-Border Cooperation in Georgia. In T. Kruessmann (Ed.), Europe in the Caucasus, Caucasus in Europe: Perspectives on the Construction of a Region (pp. 281-304). Ibidem-Verlag, Stuttgart.
Dorokhina, O. (2020). Borderlands of Georgian Ukrainians. Euxeinos, 10(30).
Duggan, R. (2008). A Model for International Border Management Systems. International Border Management Systems. Sandia National Laboratories, Sandia Report, SAND2008-6256, Unlimited Release. Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185-MS1373. Printed September 2008.
Dunér, D., & Ahlberger, C. (2019). Preface: What is Cognitive History? In D. Dunér & C. Ahlberger (Eds.), Cognitive History: Mind, Space, and Time (pp. VII-VIII). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Oldenbourg. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110582383-011
European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders ("FRONTEX"). (2024). Retrieved from http://frontex.europa.eu/
European external border surveillance system (EUROSUR). (2008). Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=URISERV%3Al14579
Feyissa, D., & Hoehne, M. V. (Eds.). (2000). State borders & borderlands as resources: An analytical framework. In A. Cohen (Ed.), Signifying identities: Anthropological perspectives on boundaries and contested values (pp. 17). London: Routledge.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
Gibler, D. M. (2012). The Territorial Peace: Borders, State Development, and International Conflict. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Golunov, S. (2009, April 8). Pogranichnaya bezopasnost: zarubezhnyy opyt modeli vzaimootnosheniy sopredel'nykh gosudarstv. Retrieved from http://www.perspektivy.info/book/pogranichnaja_bezopasnost_zarubezhnyj_opyt_modeli_vzaimootnoshenij_sopredelnyh_gosudarstv_2009-04-08.htmm
Hoseason, A. (2010). The Role of Borders as Sites and Progenitors of Conflict: A Critical Analysis. Global Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Current Affairs and Applied Contemporary Thought, 1(2), 166-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2010.10707862
International Boundaries Research Unit. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.dur.ac.uk/ibru/
Jiménez, G. A., Orenes, B. P., & Puente, N. S. (2010). An Approach to the Concept of a Virtual Border: Identities and Communication Spaces. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 65, 214-221. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-65-2010-894-214-221-EN
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 430-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3.
Kaidesoja, T., Hyyryläinen, M., & Puustinen, R. (2022). Two traditions of cognitive sociology: An analysis and assessment of their cognitive and methodological assumptions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 52(3), 528-547. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12341
Kim, S. Y. (2020). Mapping Imaginary Boundaries: Geopolitical Narratives and Territorial Claims in East Asia. Geopolitics, 25(3), 402-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2019.1672417
Kolossov, V. & O’Loughlin, J. (1999). Pseudo-States as Harbingers of a New Geopolitics: The Example of the Trans-Dniestr Moldovan Republic. In D. Newman (ed.) Boundaries, Territories and Postmodernity. London: Frank Cass.
Kolossov, V. (2005). Theorizing Border Studies: Changing Perspectives and Theoretical Approaches. Geopolitics, 10(4), 606-632. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040500318415
Laine, J. P. (2021). Identities and methodologies of border studies: Recent empirical and conceptual approaches. Foreword. UniGR-Center for Border Studies, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.25353/ubtr-xxxx-e930-87fc
Marsico, G., & Varzi, A. C. (2016). Psychological and social borders: Regulating relationships. In Psychology as the science of human being (pp. 237-250). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21094-0_19
Marsico, G., Dazzani, V., Ristum, M., & de Souza Bastos, A. C. (Eds.). (2015). Cultural Psychology of Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18765-5
Mishra, A., & Mishra, H. (2010). Border bias: The belief that state borders can protect against disasters. Psychological Science, 21, 1582-1586.
Montello, D. R. (2018). Behavioral and cognitive geography: Introduction and overview. In D. R. Montello (Ed.), Handbook of behavioral and cognitive geography (pp. 3-15). Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Nail, T. (2016). Theory of the Border. Oxford University Press.
Németh, S., Németh, Á., & Kaisto, V. (2013). Research design for studying development in border areas: Case studies towards the big picture? Belgeo, 1. https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.10582
Newman, D. (2006). The lines that continue to separate us: borders in our 'borderless' world. Progress in Human Geography, 30(2), 143-161.
Newman, D., & Paasi, A. (1998). Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: boundary narratives in political geography. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2), 186-207.
OECD/SWAC. (2022). Borders and Conflicts in North and West Africa, West African Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/6da6d21e
Olapegba, P. O., & Idemudia, E. S. (2012). Dispositional and contextual factors predicting smuggling behaviour among smugglers in border areas in Nigeria. Journal of Psychology, 3(2), 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/09764224.2012.11885478
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. (2005). Border Security and Management Concept: Framework for Co-operation by the OSCE Participating States. Ministerial Council, Ljubljana, Second day of the Thirteenth Meeting, MC Journal 13(2), Agenda item 8.
Paasi, A. (2011). A border theory: An unattainable dream or a realistic aim for border scholars? In The Routledge Research Companion to Border Studies (1st ed., pp. 22). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315612782
Panarina, D. S. (2015). Border and frontier as a factor in the development of a region and/or country. Istoriya i sovremennost, 1, 15-41.
Pinto, M. (2023). Methodological and Cognitive Biases in Science: Issues for Current Research and Ways to Counteract Them. Perspectives on Science, 31(5), 535-554. https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00589
PwC. (2015). The Future of Border Management: Maintaining security; facilitating prosperity.
Rankin, K. J., & Schofield, R. N. (2004). The troubled historiography of classical boundary terminology. University College Dublin, Institute for British-Irish Studies.
Rusetsky, A. (2023). Political Crisis of Abkhazia - Possibilities of Metacognitive Management Theory. Dissertation work. Caucasus International University
Scott, J. W. (Ed.). (2020). A research agenda for border studies. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Smith, J. K. (2020). The Role of Imaginary Borders in International Conflict Resolution. Journal of International Relations, 35(2), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066120936125
Starr, H., & Thomas, G. D. (2005). The nature of borders and international conflict: Revisiting hypotheses on territory. International Studies Quarterly, 49, 123-139.
Talmy, L. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (2nd ed.).
The European Union Border Assistance Mission to Moldova and Ukraine (EUBAM). (2023). http://eubam.org/who-we-are/
The University of the Greater Region. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.uni-gr.eu/en/unigr-key-figures
van Houtum, H. (1998). The development of cross-border economic relations. A theoretical and empirical study of the influence of the state border on the development of cross-border economic relations between firms in border regions of the Netherlands and Belgium. Thela Thesis Publishers.
van Houtum, H. (2005). The geopolitics of borders and boundaries. Geopolitics, 10, 672-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040500318522
Varró, K. (2014). Spatial Imaginaries of the Dutch-German-Belgian Borderlands: A Multidimensional Analysis of Cross-Border Regional Governance. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(6), 2235-2255. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12202
Volkan, D. V. (2017). Immigrants and refugees. Trauma, perennial mourning, prejudice, and border psychology. Karnac Books Ltd.
Wapner, J. (2020). Wall disease: The psychological toll of living up against a border. The Experiment.
Yuval-Davis, N., & Stoetzler, M. (2002). Imagined Boundaries and Borders: A Gendered Gaze. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 9(3), 329-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506802009003378
Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso. (Second revised edition, first published in 1983, revised edition in 1991).
Aniszewski, S. (2009). Coordinated Border Management – a concept paper. WCO Research Paper No. 2. World Customs Organization.
Aphijanyatham, R. (2009). A Comparative Analysis of the Different Perceptions of Borders and of the Cost-Benefit Assessment Between the Thai Government, Shan Migrant Workers, Thai Employers and Informal Brokers. In Perceptions of Borders and Human Migration (1–). Institut de recherche sur l’Asie du Sud-Est contemporaine. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.irasec.1068
Association of Borderland Studies. (2024). Retrieved from http://absborderlands.org/
Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.
Brambilla, C., & Jones, R. (2019). Rethinking borders, violence, and conflict: From sovereign power to borderscapes as sites of struggles. EPD: Society and Space, 0(0), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819856352
Brown, B. S. (1983). A new perspective on the political and psychological nature of borders and sovereignty. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 28(8), 625-631. Lecture presented at the 33rd annual meeting of the Canadian Psychiatric Association, Ottawa, Ontario, September 1983.
Brunet-Jailly, E. (2005). Theorizing borders: An interdisciplinary perspective. Geopolitics, 10, 633–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040500318449
Congress of Local Authorities Council of Europe. Retrieved from https://wcd.coe.int/com.instranet.InstraServlet?command=com.instranet.CmdBlobGet&InstranetImage=1716997&SecMode=1&DocId=1479436&Usage=2
Cross Border Cooperation. (2024). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/neighbourhood/cross-border-cooperation_en
Deutsch, M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes. Yale University Press.
Dhungana, R. R., Aryal, N., Adhikary, P., Krishna, R., Regmi, P. R., Devkota, B., Sharma, G. N., Wickramage, K., Teijlingen, E. van, & Simkhada, P. (2019). Psychological morbidity in Nepali cross-border migrants in India: A community based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 19, 1534. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7881-z
Dorokhina, O. (2016). Modern Approaches to Border Management. Academy of Public Administration of Armenia. Conference: International Conference "Problems of Modern Management" (pp. 421-427). Yerevan, Armenia.
Dorokhina, O. (2019). European Experience for Development of Cross-Border Cooperation in Georgia. In T. Kruessmann (Ed.), Europe in the Caucasus, Caucasus in Europe: Perspectives on the Construction of a Region (pp. 281-304). Ibidem-Verlag, Stuttgart.
Dorokhina, O. (2020). Borderlands of Georgian Ukrainians. Euxeinos, 10(30).
Duggan, R. (2008). A Model for International Border Management Systems. International Border Management Systems. Sandia National Laboratories, Sandia Report, SAND2008-6256, Unlimited Release. Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185-MS1373. Printed September 2008.
Dunér, D., & Ahlberger, C. (2019). Preface: What is Cognitive History? In D. Dunér & C. Ahlberger (Eds.), Cognitive History: Mind, Space, and Time (pp. VII-VIII). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Oldenbourg. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110582383-011
European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders ("FRONTEX"). (2024). Retrieved from http://frontex.europa.eu/
European external border surveillance system (EUROSUR). (2008). Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=URISERV%3Al14579
Feyissa, D., & Hoehne, M. V. (Eds.). (2000). State borders & borderlands as resources: An analytical framework. In A. Cohen (Ed.), Signifying identities: Anthropological perspectives on boundaries and contested values (pp. 17). London: Routledge.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
Gibler, D. M. (2012). The Territorial Peace: Borders, State Development, and International Conflict. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Golunov, S. (2009, April 8). Pogranichnaya bezopasnost: zarubezhnyy opyt modeli vzaimootnosheniy sopredel'nykh gosudarstv. Retrieved from http://www.perspektivy.info/book/pogranichnaja_bezopasnost_zarubezhnyj_opyt_modeli_vzaimootnoshenij_sopredelnyh_gosudarstv_2009-04-08.htmm
Hoseason, A. (2010). The Role of Borders as Sites and Progenitors of Conflict: A Critical Analysis. Global Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Current Affairs and Applied Contemporary Thought, 1(2), 166-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2010.10707862
International Boundaries Research Unit. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.dur.ac.uk/ibru/
Jiménez, G. A., Orenes, B. P., & Puente, N. S. (2010). An Approach to the Concept of a Virtual Border: Identities and Communication Spaces. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 65, 214-221. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-65-2010-894-214-221-EN
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 430-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3.
Kaidesoja, T., Hyyryläinen, M., & Puustinen, R. (2022). Two traditions of cognitive sociology: An analysis and assessment of their cognitive and methodological assumptions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 52(3), 528-547. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12341
Kim, S. Y. (2020). Mapping Imaginary Boundaries: Geopolitical Narratives and Territorial Claims in East Asia. Geopolitics, 25(3), 402-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2019.1672417
Kolossov, V. & O’Loughlin, J. (1999). Pseudo-States as Harbingers of a New Geopolitics: The Example of the Trans-Dniestr Moldovan Republic. In D. Newman (ed.) Boundaries, Territories and Postmodernity. London: Frank Cass.
Kolossov, V. (2005). Theorizing Border Studies: Changing Perspectives and Theoretical Approaches. Geopolitics, 10(4), 606-632. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040500318415
Laine, J. P. (2021). Identities and methodologies of border studies: Recent empirical and conceptual approaches. Foreword. UniGR-Center for Border Studies, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.25353/ubtr-xxxx-e930-87fc
Marsico, G., & Varzi, A. C. (2016). Psychological and social borders: Regulating relationships. In Psychology as the science of human being (pp. 237-250). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21094-0_19
Marsico, G., Dazzani, V., Ristum, M., & de Souza Bastos, A. C. (Eds.). (2015). Cultural Psychology of Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18765-5
Mishra, A., & Mishra, H. (2010). Border bias: The belief that state borders can protect against disasters. Psychological Science, 21, 1582-1586.
Montello, D. R. (2018). Behavioral and cognitive geography: Introduction and overview. In D. R. Montello (Ed.), Handbook of behavioral and cognitive geography (pp. 3-15). Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Nail, T. (2016). Theory of the Border. Oxford University Press.
Németh, S., Németh, Á., & Kaisto, V. (2013). Research design for studying development in border areas: Case studies towards the big picture? Belgeo, 1. https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.10582
Newman, D. (2006). The lines that continue to separate us: borders in our 'borderless' world. Progress in Human Geography, 30(2), 143-161.
Newman, D., & Paasi, A. (1998). Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: boundary narratives in political geography. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2), 186-207.
OECD/SWAC. (2022). Borders and Conflicts in North and West Africa, West African Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/6da6d21e
Olapegba, P. O., & Idemudia, E. S. (2012). Dispositional and contextual factors predicting smuggling behaviour among smugglers in border areas in Nigeria. Journal of Psychology, 3(2), 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/09764224.2012.11885478
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. (2005). Border Security and Management Concept: Framework for Co-operation by the OSCE Participating States. Ministerial Council, Ljubljana, Second day of the Thirteenth Meeting, MC Journal 13(2), Agenda item 8.
Paasi, A. (2011). A border theory: An unattainable dream or a realistic aim for border scholars? In The Routledge Research Companion to Border Studies (1st ed., pp. 22). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315612782
Panarina, D. S. (2015). Border and frontier as a factor in the development of a region and/or country. Istoriya i sovremennost, 1, 15-41.
Pinto, M. (2023). Methodological and Cognitive Biases in Science: Issues for Current Research and Ways to Counteract Them. Perspectives on Science, 31(5), 535-554. https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00589
PwC. (2015). The Future of Border Management: Maintaining security; facilitating prosperity.
Rankin, K. J., & Schofield, R. N. (2004). The troubled historiography of classical boundary terminology. University College Dublin, Institute for British-Irish Studies.
Rusetsky, A. (2023). Political Crisis of Abkhazia - Possibilities of Metacognitive Management Theory. Dissertation work. Caucasus International University
Scott, J. W. (Ed.). (2020). A research agenda for border studies. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Smith, J. K. (2020). The Role of Imaginary Borders in International Conflict Resolution. Journal of International Relations, 35(2), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066120936125
Starr, H., & Thomas, G. D. (2005). The nature of borders and international conflict: Revisiting hypotheses on territory. International Studies Quarterly, 49, 123-139.
Talmy, L. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (2nd ed.).
The European Union Border Assistance Mission to Moldova and Ukraine (EUBAM). (2023). http://eubam.org/who-we-are/
The University of the Greater Region. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.uni-gr.eu/en/unigr-key-figures
van Houtum, H. (1998). The development of cross-border economic relations. A theoretical and empirical study of the influence of the state border on the development of cross-border economic relations between firms in border regions of the Netherlands and Belgium. Thela Thesis Publishers.
van Houtum, H. (2005). The geopolitics of borders and boundaries. Geopolitics, 10, 672-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040500318522
Varró, K. (2014). Spatial Imaginaries of the Dutch-German-Belgian Borderlands: A Multidimensional Analysis of Cross-Border Regional Governance. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(6), 2235-2255. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12202
Volkan, D. V. (2017). Immigrants and refugees. Trauma, perennial mourning, prejudice, and border psychology. Karnac Books Ltd.
Wapner, J. (2020). Wall disease: The psychological toll of living up against a border. The Experiment.
Yuval-Davis, N., & Stoetzler, M. (2002). Imagined Boundaries and Borders: A Gendered Gaze. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 9(3), 329-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506802009003378
##submission.downloads##
Опубліковано
2024-06-30
Як цитувати
Дорохіна, О., & Русецький, О. (2024). Розкриття потенціалу метакогнітивного підходу до управління в прикордонних дослідженнях. Науково-теоретичний альманах Грані, 27(3), 124–134. https://doi.org/10.15421/172460
Номер
Розділ
ПОЛІТОЛОГІЯ
