Tolerance as a factor of value system formation within process of cross-cultural communication
Keywords:
communication, tolerance, value system, community, nation, axiology, crosscultural relations
Abstract
Crosscultural communication relates to particular phenomenon in two or more cultures and has an additional value for communicative competence comparison of different cultures representatives. The realization of communicative competence capacity is culturally conditioned, in addition, it also caused by unique individual experience of person. Intercultural communication became one of the most urgent issues of humanity in modern society. Study of intercultural communication becomes increasingly important in recent years due to globalization. Features of intercultural communication are studied within the sciences such as philosophy, linguistics, cultural studies, psychology, sociology, anthropology, ethnology, cybernetics, and an interdisciplinary process. Intercultural communication as a social phenomenon was called to the practical needs of the postwar world, reinforced by ideological interest, which of the early twentieth century was formed in academia and in the public mind for the different cultures and languages. The study of intercultural communication is a result of rapid economic development of many countries and regions, revolutionary changes in technology associated with this globalization of economic activity. On the level of historical evolutionary approach to the development of complex systems tolerance phenomenon could not be reduced to everyday perspective of tolerance. Tolerance is works as cultural norm and as a civilization principle. A key feature of tolerance as long as multiculturalism is support of complex systems diversity. Tolerance also provides a right of each individual to be a different personality. The concept of tolerance is understood as a norm that provides a balance opposing sides and the possibility of dialogue of various world views, religions and cultures. Initial thesis that each person is a unique individual and unlike the others, is characterized by different manifestations of their own individuality, is the basis for the establishment of tolerance as a positive and respectful attitude. Together outlined elements of culture form the crosscultural communication, its main feature is the ability to see common in cultures of countries, as well as the period in which there is confusion or conflict of cultures, there are contradictions between their representatives. Crosscultural competence is defined as the integral quality of the individual, which includes knowledge about the features of other cultures, ability to interpret cultural information, experience of communicative activity. Within that perspective crosscultural communication could be defined as a set of analytical and strategic skills that increase interpretive field during intercultural communication.References
1. Aleshina I.V. Marketing: krosskulturnye problemy i vozmozhnosti (Marketing: crosscultural challenges and opportunities) Sovremennyj menedzment: problemy, gipotezy, issledovaniya. — 2011. — №2. — Р. 94–103.
2. Bondarenko N. Krosskulturnye kommunikacii (Crosscultural communication) Upravlenie korporativnoj kulturoj. — 2010. — № 2 (06). — Р. 18–23.
3. Bunina V.G. Krosskulturnyj menedzment i mezhkulturnaya kommunikacia: uchebnoe posobie (Crosscultural management and intercultural communication). – M.: GUU, 2008. – 128 р.
4. Golovleva E.L. Osnovy mezhkulturnoj kommunikacii (Foundations of intercultural communication). — RostovnaDonu: Feniks, 2008. — 224 р.
5. Kirabaev N.S. Globalizacija i multikulturalizm. (Globalization and multiculturalism) Мoskva: Izdatelstvo RUDN, 2005. – Р. 325.
6. Petrushenko U.M. Kognityvna koncepcija kroskulturnogo menedzmentu (Cognitive concept of crosscultural management) Visnyk SumDU. Serija Ekonomika. –2008. – № 1. – Р. 120128.
7. Rot U. Mezhkulturnaja kommunikacija. Teoriya i trening. (Intercultural Communication. Theory and training) – М.: UNITIDANA, 2006. – Р. 223.
8. Sadohin А. P. Vvedenie v teoriju mezhkulturnoj kommunikacii (Introduction to intercultural communication). – М.: Vyshaya shkola, 2005. – 310 р.
2. Bondarenko N. Krosskulturnye kommunikacii (Crosscultural communication) Upravlenie korporativnoj kulturoj. — 2010. — № 2 (06). — Р. 18–23.
3. Bunina V.G. Krosskulturnyj menedzment i mezhkulturnaya kommunikacia: uchebnoe posobie (Crosscultural management and intercultural communication). – M.: GUU, 2008. – 128 р.
4. Golovleva E.L. Osnovy mezhkulturnoj kommunikacii (Foundations of intercultural communication). — RostovnaDonu: Feniks, 2008. — 224 р.
5. Kirabaev N.S. Globalizacija i multikulturalizm. (Globalization and multiculturalism) Мoskva: Izdatelstvo RUDN, 2005. – Р. 325.
6. Petrushenko U.M. Kognityvna koncepcija kroskulturnogo menedzmentu (Cognitive concept of crosscultural management) Visnyk SumDU. Serija Ekonomika. –2008. – № 1. – Р. 120128.
7. Rot U. Mezhkulturnaja kommunikacija. Teoriya i trening. (Intercultural Communication. Theory and training) – М.: UNITIDANA, 2006. – Р. 223.
8. Sadohin А. P. Vvedenie v teoriju mezhkulturnoj kommunikacii (Introduction to intercultural communication). – М.: Vyshaya shkola, 2005. – 310 р.
Published
2015-02-17
How to Cite
Hanas, J. (2015). Tolerance as a factor of value system formation within process of cross-cultural communication. Grani, 18(3), 98-102. https://doi.org/10.15421/1715066
Issue
Section
Статті
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
When reporting experiments on human subjects, authors should indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, the authors must explain the rationale for their approach, and demonstrate that the institutional review body explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. When reporting experiments on animals, authors should be asked to indicate whether the institutional and national guide for the care and use of laboratory animals was followed.
When reporting experiments on human subjects, authors should indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, the authors must explain the rationale for their approach, and demonstrate that the institutional review body explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. When reporting experiments on animals, authors should be asked to indicate whether the institutional and national guide for the care and use of laboratory animals was followed.
