The phenomenon of ukrainezation as factor of national consolidation the ukrainian society

  • D. P. Krasnoseletskiy Khmelnytsky humanitarian and pedagogic academy
Keywords: ukrainezation, language question, ukrainian language, culture, identity, national ideology, Ukraine


In the article the question of genesis, modern state and prospects of realization of ukrainezation is reflected between the habitants of Ukrain. This politics can work out the problems of ethnoculture heterogeneity and political disconnection of Ukraine. We deal with double cultural ( ukrainian and Russian) authentication, in part – with double state authentication in most regions of Ukraine. But absolute majority of population of Ukraine count itself foremost by the citizens of Ukraine – 67,5.  ukrainian authentication prevails in all regions above Russian (except Donbas), however presence of two authentications in all regions of Ukraine (except Galychina), especially in south­east regions, creates considerable difficulties in realization of cultural and informative politics in the conditions of military opposition with Russia. Language problem until now the remain object of political speculations and does not serve as, in a complete measure, to national interests. National ideology is absent, when it must contest with vestiges of the past, ethnoethics complexes. These and other problems assist distribution of separate influenced, to development of «Russian word», that is extremely unacceptable for the state and his people. In the conditions of ukrainezation perceptibly influences on the processes of consolidation in our society, and also serves as a tool to forming of terms of national informative safety that extremely is a necessity for objective development our of our state.


Bagdasaryan B. Vyschye cennosti Rossiyiskogo gosudarstva (Higher values of the Russian state). Seriya «Politicheskaya aksiologiya». Nauchnaya monografiya. M.: Nauchnyiy ekspert, 2012. 624 p.

Butkevych B. Pavlo Gudimov: «My ne mozhemo vpodibnyuvatycya Rosii» (Pavlo Gudimov: We do not can to similar Russia). Ukrainskyiy tyzhden. 2014. no. 12 (332). pp. 18­19.

Vasylenko V. Kompromisna postupka chy zamah na konstytuciynyiy lad (A compromise concession or encroaching is upon a constitutional line­up). Ukrainskyiy tyzhden. 2014. no. 19(339). pp. 22­25.

Vyshnyak О. Movna sytuacia ta status mov v Ukraini: dynamika, problemy, perspektyvy (sociologichnyiy analiz) (Language situation and status of languages in Ukraine: dynamics, problems, prospects (sociological analysis)). К.: Instytut sociologii NAN Ukrainy, 2009, 176 p.

Grabovskiyi S. Ukraina – ne Afryka? «Bili negry» u poshukah samyh sebe (Is Ukraine not Africa? «White negroes» in search of itself). Nizhyn: PP Lysenko M.M. 2012. – 217 p.

Kyrychenko I. Rosiyiskomovna spilnota : ukrainizaciya nayavna chy uyavna (Russian­language association: ukrainethation present or imaginary?). – Regime to access:­spilnota­ukrayinizaciya­nayavna­chi­uyavna­_.html

Kramar О. Mif pro rosiiyskomovni regiony (A myth is about the Russian­language regions).Ukrainskyiy tyzhden. 2014. no 19(339). pp. 26­29.

Kurguzov A.O. Mova yak zasib sotsiokulturnoyi samoidentifikatsiyi osobistosti (Language as means of sociocultural self­definition of personality): avtoref. dis. kand. filos. nauk: spets. 09.00.03 «Sotsialna fslosofiya ta filosofiya istoriyi». – Zaporizhya, 2004. – 10 p.

Losev I. Ukrainizaciya: zhahalka chy kategorychnyiy imperatyv? (Ukrainethation: fright or categorical imperative?). Ukrainskyiy tyzhden. 2014. no. 19(339). pp. 30­32.

Larchenko M. Nacionalna ideya ya zasib garmonizacii mizhetnichnyh vzaemen (National idea as means of harmonization of interethnos mutual relations) Regime to access: http://visnyk­­1/10%20­%201(5)%20­%203.pdf.

Malanyuk E. Do problem kulturnogo procrsu (To the problem of cultural process). Hronika 2000. 1992.

no. 2. pp. 120­123.

Panchenko V. Statusni igry (Status games). Ukrainsykyi tyzhden. 2014. no 19(339). pp. 16­17.

Ukraina ta proect «Russkogo mira»: analit. dop. (Ukraine and project of «Russian world» : analytical lecture). K.: NISD, 2014. 80 p.

Khoma N. M. Vizualizaciya ya harakterystyka postmodernoi polatychnoi dii (Imaging as a characteristic of postmodern political action). Gileya. 2014. no. 89. pp. 405­408.

Sho obyednue ta rozednue ukrainciv (What unites and disconnects ukrainians) Regime to access:­relizy/sho­obednue­ta­rozednue­ukrainciv.htm

How to Cite
Krasnoseletskiy, D. P. (2015). The phenomenon of ukrainezation as factor of national consolidation the ukrainian society. Grani, 18(3), 40-44.