Corruption, illegitimacy and external influence: political factors of state instability

  • Eduard Gugnin Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic National University
Keywords: corruption, legitimacy, political space, state, external influence, paramilitary formations

Abstract

The article constructs a descriptive and analytical description of the connection between corruption, delegitimization and loss of state sovereignty over society as background factors for increasing external influence and the destruction of political and spatial cohesion. As a result of the study, a conclusion was formulated, according to which the complete or partial loss of legitimacy coincides with the spread of corruption, which entails the devaluation of value and regulatory systems of social behavior. It is emphasized that corrupt practices contribute to the destruction of morals, law, ideology, have a devastating effect on government structures, procedures for its institutionalization, prevent the nomination of elites and leaders to command positions in the state apparatus, negatively affect the power and centralizing capabilities of the state. legitimate physical violence. It is noted that the loss of legitimacy is preceded by the loss of dialogue between government and society, the habitualization of corruption and its transformation into an endemic component of social life.It was stated that corruption increases the level of public permeability for external actors who take advantage of the situation of blurring the boundaries of political space and encourage citizens to spontaneous protests, which should shake the procedural principles of law and order, to achieve open conflicts between government and self-organized communities. what are the conditions for dialogue. External actors can seek to actively discredit the ruling elites by simultaneously unscrewing instability and escalating waves of destructive criticism aimed at disavowing all kinds of legitimacy: ideological, ethnic, structural, personalistic (charismatic), and others.It is noted that the final destruction of the state is the loss of a monopoly on public violence within the procedures established by law. Actors of external influence can resort to various acts of violence in order to encourage the ruling elites to increase security with the use of special Praetorian groups (paramilitary formations).It is summarized that the emergence of paramilitary formations is an indicator of the fragility of the state and its inability to control its own power structures, as evidenced by the violation of paramilitary formations of the usual official hierarchies and privatization of legitimate violence by alternative centers of power. Finally, it is emphasized that the destructive accompaniment of the latter is the growth of shadow arms markets, criminalization of the behavior of ordinary citizens who cease to see the state as an authorized defender of sovereignty and security and cease to trust legitimate law enforcement agencies, and these processes precede their colonial expansion. frozen conflicts with accompanying negative consequences for the state.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alekseeva, T. A. (1989). Vlast' i legitimnost' (jevoljucija nemarksistskih podhodov v sovremennoj anglijskoj politicheskoj filosofii) [Power and legitimacy (evolution of non-Marxist approaches in contemporary English political philosophy)]. Vlast': filosofsko-politologicheskie aspekty – Power: philosophical and political aspects. (pp. 110–133). Moskva: IF RAN, 110-133 [in Russian].

Andrushkevich, I. N. (1969). Legitimnost', monarhija, demokratizacija [Legitimacy, Monarchy, Democratization]. Politija, 3, 41–63 [in Russian].

Aristotel'. (1983). Sobranie sochinenij v 4-h tomah [Collected works in 4 volumes]. (Vol. 4). Moskva: Mysl' [in Russian].

Bekker, G. (2018). Autsajdery: issledovanija po sociologii deviantnosti [The Outsiders: Research on the Sociology of Deviance]. Moskva: Jelementarnye formy [in Russian].

Berger, P., & Lukman, T. (1995) Social'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sociologii znanija [Social construction of reality. Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge]. Moskva: Medium [in Russian].

Burd'e, P. (2001). Prakticheskij smysl [Practical meaning]. Sankt-Peterburg: Aletejja; Moskva: In-t jeksperiment. sociologii [in Russian].

CAST Conflict Assessment Manual. The Fund for Peace. (2014). Retrieved from https://fragilestatesindex.org/indicators/

Cilliers, J., & Douglas, I. (1999). The military as business – Military Professional Resources, Incorporated. Retrieved from http://www.privatemilitary.org/Peace_Profit_or_Plunder.html#.WZGgwFFn2Uk.

Dibirov, A. N. (2002). Ustarela li koncepcija legitimnosti M. Vebera?: O legitimacii kak akte soglasija obshhestva s gosudarstvennoj vlast'ju [Is M. Weber's concept of legitimacy outdated ?: On legitimation as an act of the consent of society with state power]. Social'no-gumanitarnye znanija, 3, 258–268 [in Russian].

Djurkgejm, Je. (1996). O razdelenii obshhestvennogo truda [On the division of social labor]. Moskva: Kanon [in Russian].

Djurkgejm, Je. (2018). Samoubijstvo [Suicide]. Moskva: AST [in Russian].

Djurkgejm, Je. (2006). Sociologija. Ee predmet, metod, prednaznachenie [Sociology. Its subject, method, purpose]. Moskva: «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitacija» [in Russian].

Gobbs, T. (1991). Izbrannye proizvedenija v 2-h tomah [Selected works in 2 volumes]. (Vol. 2). Moskva: Mysl' [in Russian].

Habermas, Ju. (1995). Demokratija. Razum. Nravstvennost': Moskovskie lekcii i interv'ju [Democracy. Mind. Morality: Moscow lectures and interviews]. Moskva: Academia [in Russian].

Lok, Dzh. (2001). Dva traktaty pro vrjaduvannja [Two treatises on government]. Kyiv: Osnovy [in Ukrainian].

Luhmann, N. (1969). Legitimation durch Verfahren. Neuwied-Berlin [in Russian].

Makiavelli, N. (1996). Gosudar'. Rassuzhdenija o pervoj dekade Tita Livija. O voennom iskusstve [Sovereign. Reasoning about the first decade of Titus Livy. About the art of war]. Moskva: Mysl' [in Russian].

Pech, K. (1999). Executive Outcomes – A corporate conquest. Retrieved from http://www.privatemilitary.org/ Peace_Profit_or_Plunder.html#.WZGgwFFn2Uk.

Popovych, V. (2020). Development of social and communicative paradigm of public administration in the field of social networks. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 4, 319–328. DOI: 10.5267/j.ijdns.2020.6.001.

Platon. (1971). Sochinenija v treh tomah [Works in three volumes]. (Vol. 3). Moskva: Mysl' [in Russian].

Romanenko, Ju. V. (Ed.). (2016). Jetnicheskaja identichnost': sociosistemologicheskoe izmerenie geopolitiki [Ethnic Identity: Sociosystemological Dimension of Geopolitics]. Kyiv: Merk'juri-Podol'e [in Russian].

Veber, M. (1990). Izbrannye proizvedenija [Selected works]. Moskva: Progress [in Russian].


Abstract views: 94
PDF Downloads: 138
Published
2020-10-20
How to Cite
Gugnin, E. (2020). Corruption, illegitimacy and external influence: political factors of state instability. Scientific and Theoretical Almanac Grani, 23(8), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.15421/172074
Section
SOCIOLOGY