Students' Opinions on Philosophy Courses

  • Oleksandr Kulyk Oles Honchar Dnipro National University
Keywords: philosophy, teaching philosophy, learning philosophy, students’ perceptions, forms of learning, forms of assessment, skills, knowledge, critical thinking

Abstract

Universities seeking to provide modern education face a constant need to update their courses. This study was conducted to collect and analyze empirical data to help philosophy course designers consider the views of Ukrainian students about effective ways to learn this subject. A survey was conducted among 40 humanities students and 34 social science students to determine participants’ views on a number of key issues related to the organization of the learning process in the Philosophy course. Most of the students surveyed said that of the types of skills and knowledge that can be acquired during the course, they will find critical thinking skills and the skills needed to build and argue their own positions on ethical, social and worldview issues most valuable in their future professional activities. The majority of respondents named traditional lectures and discussions of lecture videos as their preferred forms of learning philosophy. Their preferred forms of assessment of students’ knowledge and skills in philosophy were essays, as well as reports and participation in the discussion during practical lessons. The study also identified three significant differences in the responses of the surveyed humanities and social science students. First, socio-scientific students valued the opportunity to develop their communication skills in the framework of the Philosophy course significantly more than humanities students. Second, humanities students included thought experiments among the most desirable ways of learning philosophy, unlike social science students, who included case studies. Third, in contrast to humanities students, social science students considered quizzes to be one of the best forms of assessment for the course. In addition to the above, this study also compared the data on the opinions of social sciences and humanities students with the results of the previous survey of 60 STEM students about their thoughts on the course. The comparative analysis revealed five common features and two significant differences in the responses of students from these three fields of knowledge. The common belief among surveyed students in all three groups is that learning philosophy can provide them with the skills and knowledge they will need in their professional activities after graduation from university. Moreover, they prefer skills to knowledge. In all three groups of respondents, a large number of students named critical thinking and argumentation skills as the ultimate achievements in the learning of philosophy. Another finding was that surveyed students from all three groups do not give priority to learning the concepts of modern philosophers over learning the ideas of ancient philosophers. In addition, respondents from all three fields showed the least interest in those forms of knowledge and skills that are difficult to use outside of highly specialized philosophical activities. As for the differences, the study showed that STEM students are significantly less likely to believe that they will need the historico-philosophical components of the Philosophy course in their further professional activities than students in the humanities and social sciences. They are also more interested in developing communicative skills in the process of learning philosophy than the surveyed humanities students.

References

Bychko, I. (2006). Shljakhy onovlennja zmistu filosofsjkykh kursiv u vyshhij shkoli suchasnoji Ukrajiny [I. Ways to update the content of philosophical courses in higher education in modern Ukraine]. Filosofija osvity – Philosophy of education, 2 (4), 235–241 [in Ukrainian].

Kulyk, O. V. (2018). Ozhydanyja studentov fakuljteta prykladnoj matematyky otnosyteljno yzuchenyja fylosofyy [Expectations of students of the Faculty of Applied Mathematics regarding the study of philosophy]. Materyaly Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-praktycheskoj konferencyy "Ynnova-2018" (19–20 aprelja, Kazakhstan) – Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference "Innova-2018" (April 19-20, Kazakhstan). (pp. 119–121). Kostanaj: Yzdateljstvo KGhU ymeny A.Bajtursynova [in Russian].

Lysyj, I. (2002). Perspektyvy universytetsjkoji filosofiji ochyma studentiv NaUKMA [Perspectives of University Philosophy through the Eyes of NaUKMA Students]. Maghisterium – Magisterium, 9, 99–103 [in Ukrainian].

Maksjuta, M. (2007). Do problem vykladannja filosofiji: metody osobystisno orijentovanogho, aktyvnogho navchannja [To the problems of teaching philosophy: methods of personality-oriented, active learning]. Muljtyversum. Filosofsjkyj aljmanakh – Multiverse. Philosophical Almanac, 60, 239–244 [in Ukrainian].

Prolejev, S. V., Shashkova, L. O., Karasj, A. F., Karpenko, I. V., & Menzhulin, V. I. (2017). Proekt standartu vyshhoji osvity zi specialjnosti "filosofija" (stupinj vyshhoji osvity – maghistr) [Draft standard of higher education in the specialty "philosophy" (degree of higher education - master)]. Kyiv. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/ua/osvita/visha-osvita/naukovo-metodichna-rada-ministerstva-osviti-i-nauki-ukrayini/proekti-standartiv-vishoyi-osviti [in Ukrainian].

Ryzhko, V. (2007). Navchaljna proghrama z filosofiji ta filosofsjka refleksija [Curriculum in philosophy and philosophical reflection]. Filosofija osvity – Philosophy of education, 1 (6), 246–251 [in Ukrainian].

Soroka, Ju. (2016). Ocinka ukrajinsjkymy studentamy jakosti, zmistu ta orghanizaciji navchaljnogho procesu (na materiali empirychnogho doslidzhennja) [Ukrainian students' assessment of the quality, content and organization of the educational process (based on empirical research)]. Visnyk Kharkivsjkogho nacionaljnogho universytetu imeni VN Karazina. Serija: Sociologhichni doslidzhennja suchasnogho suspiljstva: metodologhija, teorija, metody – Bulletin of VN Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Sociological research of modern society: methodology, theory, methods, 36, 114–122 [in Ukrainian].

Chykhancova, O. (2015). Chynnyky efektyvnogho ovolodinnja inozemnymy movamy studentamy VNZ [Factors of effective mastering of foreign languages by university students]. Aktualjni problemy psykhologhiji – Current problems of psychology, 9 (6), 102–109 [in Ukrainian].

Jashhuk, T. (2005). “Jevropejsjkyj vybir” u vykladanni filosofiji u vuzi [“European Choice” in teaching philosophy at the university]. Filosofija osvity – Philosophy of education, 1, 184–192 [in Ukrainian].

American Philosophical Association. (2008). Statement on the Role of Philosophy Programs in Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.apaonline.org/page/role_of_phil.

Audi, R. (2006). Philosophy. Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2nd ed. D. M. Borchert (Ed.). (Vol. 7, pp. 325–337). Thomson Gale.

Goucha, M. (Ed.). (2007). Philosophy, a School of Freedom: Teaching Philosophy and Learning to Philosophize: Status and Prospects. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2014) Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Poor, N., & Davidson, R. (2016). The Ethics of Using Hacked Data: Patreon’s Data Hack and Academic Data Standards. Council for Big Data, Ethics and Society. Retrieved from https://bdes.datasociety.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Patreon-Case-Study.pdf.

Rudisill, J. (2011). The Transition from Studying Philosophy to Doing Philosophy. Teaching Philosophy, 34:3, 241–271. doi: 10.5840/teachphil201134332

The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (2015). Subject Benchmark Statement: Philosophy. Gloucester. Retrieved from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/subject-benchmark-statements/sbs-philosophy-15.pdf?sfvrsn=6294f781_10.

UNESCO. (2011). Teaching Philosophy in Europe and North America. Paris: UNESCO.

Published
2020-08-30
How to Cite
Kulyk, O. (2020). Students’ Opinions on Philosophy Courses . Scientific and Theoretical Almanac Grani, 23(6-7), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.15421/172069
Section
PHILOSOPHY