Transformation of system of values in the context of global problems: theoretical sociological analysis

Keywords: system of values, social risks, system methods, standard of thinking, hierarchical development, effective activity

Abstract

The article identifies the significant impact of global issues on the transformation of the system of values and describes the features of social being in the conditions of the modern crisis. The problem of destroying the value system as an obstacle to achieving personal interests in conditions of hard survival during a crisis has been studied. The social risks of transforming the value system in crisis conditions are indicated. This article also analyzes the reasons for the lack of constructive proposals for finding a better way out of the global crisis. Attention is focused on the low level of thinking of modern man. This is the reason that modern people can not understand complex modern problems and successfully solve them. Anxiety about this was expressed by the entire world community at «The World Conference on Sustainable Development» (Rio de Janeiro, 1992, 2017 and 2012.), where it was said about the need to introduce a new paradigm of thinking. The task was solved by our compatriot – academician, professor, systemologist Malyuta Alexander Nikolaevich. To successfully solve any problems of any nature and complexity, the scientist offers a new modern technology – the fundamental system methodology «Invariant modeling», based on the theory of hyper complex dynamic systems (HDS).The concept of third-generation system methods asserts that there are only three possible solutions in the crisis development zone. And only one of these options provides a harmonious way out of the global crisis.This article examines global problems that, in the current crisis, must be addressed first. We did not succeed in finding research that describes the system of values as a technology to activity. Therefore, in spite of the huge number of works on value issues, the lack of constructive proposals and effective ways to address the consequences of the transformation of the value system in a globalizing environment require further study and new developments. The article suggests an optimal way out of the crisis zone and further steps to develop a harmonious life-supporting society to revive the systems of moral norms and values that will contribute to constructive, purposeful and effective human activity.

References

1. Bakirov, V.S., & Ruchka, A.O. (2013). Sociologija cinnostej s’ogodni [Sociology of values today]. Proceedings of the IX Allukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference «Problems of development of sociological theory: conceptualization of value changes in modern society». Kyi’v [in Ukrainian].
2. Burcev, S.A. (2008). Transformacija sistem cennostej v perehodnom obshhestve [Transformation of value systems in a transition society]. Extended abstract of candidate`s thesis. Moscow [in Russian].
3. Denezhkin, A.V., Malinkin, A.N., & Fillipova, A.F. (1994). Sheler M. Izbrannye proizvedenija [Sheler M. Selected works]. Moscow: Gnozis [in Russian].
4. Egorova, L.N. (1992). Obshhechelovecheskye cennosty kak obъekt fylosofskogo analyza [Universal Values as an Object of Philosophical Analysis]. Extended abstract of candidate`s thesis. Moscow. Retrieved from: http://www.dslib.net/soc-filosofia/obwechelovecheskie-cennosti-kak-obekt-filosofskogo-analiza.html [in Russian].
5. Gadzhieva, V. (2010). Global’nyj krizis: prichiny, napravlenija, puti reshenija [Global Crisis: Causes, Directions, Solutions]. Vek globalizacii, 1 (5), 106-111. Retrieved from https://www.socionauki.ru/journal/articles/127591/ [in Russian].
6. Gofman, L.B. (1991). Durkheim E. O razdelenyy obshhestvennogo truda [On the division of social labor]. Metod socyologyy. Moscow: Publisher Nauka [in Russian].
7. Golovaha, E.I., & Panina, N.V. (1994). Social’noe bezumie. Istorija, teorija i sovremennaja praktika [Social madness. History, theory and modern practice]. Kiev: Publisher Abris [in Russian].
8. Golovaha, E., Kostenko, N., & Makeeva, S. (2014). Obshhestvo bez doveryja [Society without trust]. Kyev: Ynstytut socyologyy. Nacyonal’naja akademyja nauk Ukrayny [in Russian].
9. Jadov, V.A. (1975). O dispozicionnoj reguljacii social’nogo povedenija lichnosti [Аbout dispositional personality structure]. Metodologicheskie problemy social’noj psihologii. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
10. Jusupov, R.M. (2015). Obshhechelovecheskye cennosty: epystemologycheskyj resurs ponjatyja [Universal Values: The Epistemological Resource of a Concept]. Mezhdunarodnyj pravovoj kur’er. Retrieved from: http://inter-legal.ru/obshhechelovecheskie-tsennosti-epistemologicheskij-resurs-ponyatiya-universal-values-epistemological-resource-of-concepts [in Russian].
11. Kant, Y. Metafyzyka nravov [Metaphysics of manners]. Vvedenye v metafyzyku nravov. Retrieved from: https://www.civisbook.ru/files/File/Kant_Metaphisika_1.pdf [in Russian].
12. Koptjug, V.A. (1992). Konferencija OON po okruzhajushhej srede i razvitiju [Earth summit ‘92 United Nations conference on environment and development]. Ynformacyonnyj obzor. Rossyjskaja Akademyja nauk. Novosybyrsk. Retrieved from: http://www.prometeus.nsc.ru/koptyug/ideas/unrio92/unrio92.pdf [in Russian].
13. Maljuta, O.M. (1990). Zakonomirnosti systemnogo rozvytku [Patterns of system development]. L’viv: Vyshha shkola [in Ukrainian].
14. Maljuta, А.Н. (2010). Ynvaryantnoe modelyrovanye [Invariant modeling]. (Chp. 2). Chernygov: Centr grazhdanskyh ynycyatyv Severnaja Zvezda [in Russian].
15. Maslow, A.H. (2003). Motyvacyja y lychnost’ [Motivation and Personality]. Moscow: Pyter [in Russian].
16. Mynzdrav: Ukrayna lydyruet v Evrope po urovnju smertnosty novorozhdennыh. (2017). [Ministry of Health: Ukraine is the leader in the level of infant mortality in Europe]. Vesty. Retrieved from https://vesti-ukr.com/strana/228954-minzdrav-ukraina-lidiruet-v-evrope-po-urovnju-smertnosti-novorozhdennykh [in Russian].
17. Politov, A.V. (2014). Ontologicheskij smysl ponjatija hronotopa v filosofskih idejah A. Uhtomskogo i M. Bahtina [The ontological meaning of the concept of chronotope in the philosophical ideas of A. Ukhtomsky and M. Bakhtin]. Nauchnyj ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava Ural’skogo otdelenija Rossijskoj akademii nauk, 14 (4) [in Russian].
18. Prohorov, M. (1983). Sovetskij jenciklopedicheskij slovar’ [Soviet Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow: Sovetskaja Jenciklopedija [in Russian].
19. Robert, K.M. (2006). Socyal’naja teoryja y socyal’naja struktura [Social Theory and Social Structure]. Moscow: HRANYTEL’’ [in Russian].
20. Ruchka, A.O. (2011). Cinnisni priorytety naselennja Ukrai’ny za umov transformacii’ [Valuable priorities of the Ukrainian population in the conditions of transformation]. Ukrai’ns’ke suspil’stvo. Sociologichnyj monitoryng. Nacyonal’na akademija nauk Ukrai’ny [in Ukrainian].
21. Sorokin, P. Krizis nashego vremeni [The Crisis of Our Age]. Sochinenija. Biblioteka jelektronnoj literatury. Retrieved from: http://litresp.ru/chitat/ru/С/sorokin-pitirim-aleksandrovich/sochineniya/11 [in Russian].
22. Storcheus, N.V. (2017). German Lotce: chto est’’ istorija? Istorija, politologija, sociologija, filosofija: teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty [Hermann Lotke: what is history? History, political science, sociology, philosophy: theoretical and practical aspects]. Proceedings of the I-II International Scientific and Practical Conference. Novosibirsk: SibAK [in Russian].
23. Uchenie Aristotelja o nravstvennyh cennostjah [Aristotle’s teaching on moral values]. Studencheskaja biblioteka onlajn. Retrieved from: https://studbooks.net/631535/kulturologiya/uchenie_aristotelya_nravstvennyh_tsennostyah [in Russian].
24. World Values Survey. Institute for Comparative Survey Research. Vienna – Austria. Retrieved from: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp
Published
2019-02-28
How to Cite
Rus-Poltavska, A. (2019). Transformation of system of values in the context of global problems: theoretical sociological analysis. Grani, 22(2), 32-39. https://doi.org/10.15421/171920
Section
Article