Public deliberative discourse as an instrument for political modernization


  • O. O. Demyanenko Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Keywords: deliberation, public policy, political system, political culture, political consciousness, political relations, improvement, political institutions, state

Abstract

The article provides a comprehensive analysis of public deliberative discourse as one of the leading instruments for political modernization. The emphasis is placed on the fact that deliberative communication became possible in practical terms as a result of consolidation of postmodern as a world outlook. It is emphasized that deliberative discourse is a communicative act of equal members, aimed at achieving a compromise in the form of a concrete public decision. The author argues that deliberative discourse contributes to the strengthening of civil society, which, in turn, acts as a kind of trigger for political modernization. After all, the consolidated community is better aware of its own interests, properly formulates common requirements and communicates them to the state and other political institutions. Deliberation offers a new interpretation of rationality, legitimacy, publicity, etc. Public policy is a sphere of partnership interaction of public entities, including the state as a carrier of political power and civil society as a carrier of communication power. It is systematically proved that deliberative discourse has a complex effect on the political system, which is objectified at the level of its individual components. Political modernization is understood as the logical existential deployment of the political system, which states the dynamics and denies the static of the latter. In the course of a deliberative discourse, changes take place in the political consciousness of a citizen, emotional expressions turn into logical and rational beliefs. It is argued that inclusiveness, equality and transparency of deliberative measures allow a citizen to become an active actor of public policy, suggesting a new political culture. Changing values provokes a new way of action. Therefore, a delibearative political culture leads to a new format of political relations – cooperation. As a result, a number of changes take place at the institutional level (the public administration model and its tools are updated). That is how the paradigm of good governance is strengthened and the e-governance method is activated. Modernization measures at the level of political consciousness and culture, political relations and institutions with necessity lead to the improvement of the normative and legal basis for the functioning of the political sphere of public life.

References

1. Ahmetov, R. (2009). Traktovka spravedlivosti kak chestnosti v social’no-politicheskoj filosofii Dzhona Rolza [Interpretation of justice as honesty in the socio-political philosophy of John Rawls]. Retrieved from: http://vestnik.osu.ru/2009_7/11.pdf [in Russian].
2. Bartagariyeva, I. (2013). Deliberaty`vna parady`gma gromadyans`kogo suspil`stva ta racional`nist` pravovogo dy`skursu [Deliberative paradigm of civil society and the rationality of legal discourse]. Hileia: naukovyi visnyk, 72, 482-486. [in Ukrainian].
3. Voropayeva, V. (2014). Metamorfozy` suchasnoyi polity`chnoyi svidomosti v umovax polity`chnoyi kry`zy`: social`no-filosofs`ky`j kontekst [Metamorphoses of modern political consciousness in the conditions of the political crisis: the socio-philosophical context]. Retrieved from: http://www.zgia.zp.ua/gazeta/znpgvzdia_2014_57_175.pdf [in Ukrainian].
4. Doktorov, B. (2007). Metodologiya i praktika oprosov obogashchennogo obshchestvennogo mneniya [Methodology and practice of enriched public opinion polls]. Retrieved from: https://corp.fom.ru/uploads/socreal/post-308.pdf [in Russian].
5. Kuhareva, G. (2015). Nalezhne uryaduvannya yak shlyax do stanovlennya diyevoyi sy`stemy` publichnogo upravlinnya v Ukrayini [Good governance as a way to the formation of an effective system of public administration in Ukraine]. Retrieved from: http://www.kbuapa.kharkov.ua/e-book/tpdu/2015-3/doc/1/12.pdf [in Ukrainian].
6. Semenenko, I. (2012). «Chelovek politicheskij» pered al’ternativami obshchestvennyh transformacij: opyt pereosmysleniya individual’nogo izmereniya politiki [“A Political Man” before alternatives to social transformations: the experience of rethinking the individual dimension of politics.]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 6, 9-26 [in Russian].
7. Servecz`ky`j, I. (2012). Formuvannya polity`chnoyi svidomosti gromadyan – progres suspil`stva [Formation of political consciousness of citizens - the progress of society]. Retrieved from: http://papers.univ.kiev.ua/1/jurydychni_nauky/articles/servetskiy-i-redka-v-forming-of-political-consciousness-of-citizens-is-progr_19598.pdf [in Ukrainian].
8. Benhabib, S. (1996). Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy. Princeton: Democracy and Difference.
9. Dryzek, J. (2002). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Fishkin, J. (2009). When the People Speak, Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Published
2019-01-11
How to Cite
Demyanenko, O. (2019). Public deliberative discourse as an instrument for political modernization. Grani, 21(11), 101-107. https://doi.org/10.15421/1718158
Section
Статті