The issue of borders and cross-border processes in socio-humanitarian sciences

  • O. F. Benchak Uzhhorod National University
Keywords: social cognition, socio-humanities, sociology, borders, transborder processes, sociological variant of system methodology


The essence of social knowledge of borders and cross-border processes in the socio-humanitarian sciences in general and in sociology in particular has been analyzed in the article. The three stages of formation of knowledge about these phenomena and processes have been distinguished on this basis. Particular attention has been paid to the characteristics of the third stage, when interdisciplinary researches become dominant in social cognition due to the leading role of sociology. The special role of the sociology in the cognitive process, its possibilities in conducting theoretic, methodological and empirical studies has been determined. The necessity of constituting a separate direction - «sociology of borders and cross-border processes» as a medium-level sociological theory has been emphasized. Cross-border processes exist since there are boundaries. They may be limited by one or another part of states’ territories, but also they may cover all their depth. The purpose of boundaries’ establishing is to protect the state’s resource potential (human and natural). The purpose of their violation is to capture this potential. The large-scale violation of the border is the war of one country, which is accompanied by various human losses. The conducted analysis shows that the boundaries are a historical product that appeared at that stage of society’s development, when it became necessary to regulate the spatial existence of private property institutions and the existence of the state. Together with changes in these institutions’ development needs, the relevant cross-border processes are taking place in the space. That’s why, there are no unchanged borders. The exceptional significance of the sociological version of the system methodology being the methodological platform for interdisciplinary studies of cross-boundary processes and phenomena has been grounded.


1. Ustych, S.I. (2014). Metodolohiya systemnoho doslidzhennya transkordonnykh protsesiv ta yiyi sotsialʹna implementatsiya [Methodology of systematic study of cross-border processes and its social implementation]. Uzhhorod: Polihraf-tsentr «Lira» [in Ukrainian].
2. Jackson, R.J. (2004). NATO and Peacekeeping. London: Routledge
3. Chernyak, Ye.B. (1988). Vekovyye konflikty. Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya. [Century conflicts. International relations]. Moscow [in Russian].
4. Mackinder, H.J. (1942). Democratic Ideals and Reality. New York.
5. Geopolitiká [Geopolitics]. (1996). Velký sociologický slovnik. Praha: Vydavatelství Karolinum.
6. Kjellen, R. (1899). Der Staat als Lebensform. Leipzig.
7. Kolossov, V. (2005). Border Studies: Changing Perspectives and Theoretical Approaches. Geopolitics, 10, 606-632.
8. Вrunet-Jailly, Е. (2005). Theorizing Вorders: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Geopolitics, 10, 633-670.
9. Benchak, O. (2017). Istoriya, shcho obʺyednuye. Narysy novitnʹoho transkordonnoho spivrobitnytstva u Karpat•sʹkomu rehioni [Connecting history. Features of the latest cross-border cooperation in the Carpathian region]. Uzhhorod: DVNZ «UzhNU» [in Ukrainian].
10. Pakhomov, Yu.N., & Pavlenko, Yu.V. (Eds.). (2006). Global’nyye transformatsii sovremennosti [Global Transformations of the Present]. Tsivilizatsionnaya struktura sovremennogo mira. (Vols. 1-3). Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Russian].
11. A Globalizing World? Culture, Economics, Politics (2004). 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
12. Faltan, L. (2004). Euroregiony a regionalny rozvoj na Slovensku, In: Regionalny rozvoj Slovenska v europskych in- 33 tegracnych kontextoch (Regiony, prihranicne regiony, euroregiony). Bratislava. ISBN 80-85544-37-7.
13. Wallerstein, I. (2000). The Essential Wallerstein. New York: The New York Press.
14. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. (2001). Vol. 9.
15. Kolossov, V. (2005). Border Studies: Changing Perspectives and Theoretical Approaches. Geopolitics, 10, 606-632.
16. Paasi, A. (1996). Territories, Boundaries and Counsciousness: The Changing Geografies of the Finnish-Russian Border. New York: John Wiley.
17. Ustych, S. (2012). Optimization of Transborder Cooperation System: concept and its pilot application (examples of neighboring regions of Hungary, Slovakia, Romania and Ukraine). Uzhhorod: ІТС.
18. Ustych, S. (2012). Indeksni doslidzhennya transkordonnoho spivrobitnytstva [Indicative studies of cross-border cooperation]. Uzhhorod: IT•S [in Ukrainian].
19. Ustych, S. (2014). Сoncept of sociological services for transborder cooperation. Uzhhorod: ІТС.
20. Ustych, S. (2014). Report on a pilot empirical sociological research «Borders through the eyes of people». Uzhhorod: ІТС.
21. Borocz, J. (1992). Dual dependency and the informalization of external linkages: the case of Hungary. Research in Social Movements, Coflicts and Change.
How to Cite
Benchak, O. F. (2019). The issue of borders and cross-border processes in socio-humanitarian sciences. Grani, 21(11), 62-69.