Mytho-logic anthropology and discursive games of Gods in time stream

Keywords: creation of name, true, the subject, manufacture of set, gods, creation, thought, time


Is the thought a gift or bloody hell of the person? Involving in a discourse of «another» is accompanied by forming of a field of own senses. Senses come, but they are not born by own «I». But «a science way» (connected with external language games) or a self-immersing way (connected with meditational practice’s), actually, eliminated our own «I». The way (as would tell the Buddha, Moisej or the Christ, and presently M. Heidegger or M. Moss) is a gift. Such gift allows to reconstruct own human nature and to open «passes» (ways) to different measurement of existence of the person. All transitions between measurements connected systems of signs (or languages). In particular, the system of signs allows to transfer the Messiah gift to historical space by means of a myth or mythical and poetic text. Actually, those who put myths or established names, always occupied exclusive position in a society. Interpreters of Ancient Greek mythology asserted that the main gift of gods is fire; however, main gift of gods was the word and a name (language).In «Being and time» of M. Heidegger language is the house of being. The main thought consists that being is structured as language. According to the modern version of J. Lacan, unconscious is structured as language, and unconscious acts as hidden (unconscious) presence of another (or Another as higher Father-god), so language is found out as universal unity, the universal topos, connecting mental and, probably, spiritual space. Not only unconscious, but also spiritual (and mental) it is structured as language. S. Freud and J. Lacan have found out only private forms of a certain universal principle in which specifies creativity of structuralists and poststructuralists: all actively existing (living) is structured as language or is functional in the field of signs and symbols (in the field of language). Leaning Gegel’s and Neohegelians creativity, it can be asserted that Spirit, generating the dialectic negation – a matter, does not disappear, it is not transformed, and continues process of naming, being in other measurement. But the spirit is structured as another in the creation-naming. The mono-spirit is not enough for a birth of the world, the act of naming means presence of another.In search of a nature bases of modern philosophy A. Badiou tried to find a way of realisation of patrimonial procedures in synchronous (adhered to the present) space of human thought and open the essence modern (postmodern) multiplane and polymorphic culture and thought. Proceeding from A. Badiou’s creativity it is possible to conclude, errors in act of naming is very cost much to mankind.


1. Badyu, A. (2003). Manifest filosofii [The Manifesto of Philosophy]. St. Petersburg: Machina [in Russian].
2. Gusserl, E. (1994). Fenomenologiya vnutrennego soznaniya vremeni [Phenomenology of the inner consciousness of time]. (Vol. 1). Moscow: Gnozis [in Russian].
3. Kozhev, A. (2003) Dialektika realnogo i fenomenologicheskiy metod u Gegelya [Dialectics of the real and phenomenological method of Hegel]. Vvedenie v chtenie Gegelya. St. Petersburg: Nauka [in Russian]
4. Moss, M. (1996) Ocherk o dare [Essay on a gift]. Obschestva. Obmen. Lichnost: Trudy po socialnoy antropologii. Moscow: Izdatelskaya firma «Vostochnaya literatura» RAN [in Russian].
5. Platon (1996). Kratil (Kratylos). Sobranie sochineniy. Moscow: Mysl [in Russian].
6. Rigveda [Rigveda]. (1995). Mandaly V-VIII. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian]
7. Sossyur, (1998). Kurs obschey lingvistiki [Course of General Linguistics]. Moscow: Logos [in Russian].
8. Haydegger, M. (2006). Chto zovetsya myshlenie? [What is thought?]. Moscow: Izdatelskiy dom «Territoriya buduschego» [in Russian].
How to Cite
Okorokov, V. B. (2018). Mytho-logic anthropology and discursive games of Gods in time stream. Grani, 21(10), 156-163.