Communicative rationality as a phenomenological component of legal identification


  • Y. S. Kravtsov Dniprovsky State Technical University
Keywords: communicative rationality, modernization of education, social cognition, paradigm of intersubjective understanding, communicative reality, phenomenological orientation, understanding of the «Other»

Abstract

The changes taking place in the modern world, the modern socio-cultural situation, require modern human mobility and an adequate response to the modern demands of society, put it before the need to revise traditional goals and landmarks. The article deals with the new situation in the education sector, which is given the peculiarities of modern stage of development of the education system and by the need to rethink the principles of values education in the XXI century. through the prism of sustainable development priorities . Feature of modern social cognition that sets a new paradigm is that it is carried out through the analysis of what representations mediated self cognitive attitude to social phenomena, accompanied by deep rekonstruction communicative nature of social reality, changes in the socio – communicative  sphere. In the article the author shows that in the pedagogical plan it means that the main result of education should not be a system of knowledge, skills and skills by itself, but a set of modern key competencies in the intellectual, social, legal, communicative, informational spheres. The author proceeds from the fact that replacing the old paradigm today comes the paradigm of intersubjective understanding and communication. The focus of today’s research has shifted from cognitive-instrumental to communicative rationality. The author notes that the peculiarity of modern social knowledge, which sets the new paradigm, is that it is carried out through an analysis of what representations are mediated by the cognitive attitude to social phenomena, which is accompanied by a profound reassessment of the communicative nature of social reality, changes in social communicative the field.

References

1. Berger, P., & Lukman, T. (1995). Sotcialnoe konstruirovanie realnosti. Traktat po sotciologii znaniia [Social construction of reality. A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge]. Moscow: «Medium» [in Russian].
2. Buber, M. (1992). Problema cheloveka. K vsemirnomu filosofskomu kongressu [The problem of man. To the World Philosophical Congress]. Spetcializirovannaia informatciia po obshcheakademicheskoi programme: «Chelovek, nauka, obshchestvo: kompleksnye issledovaniia». Moscow: RAN INION [in Russian].
3. Gіdens, E. (1999). Sotcіologіia [Sociology]. Kyiv: Osnovi [in Ukrainian].
4. Emelin, V.A. (2013). Vavilonskaia set: eroziia istinnosti i differentciatciia identichnosti v prostranstve Interneta [The Babylonian Network: the erosion of truth and the differentiation of identity in the Internet space]. Voprosy filosofii, 1, 74-78
[in Russian].
5. Karpenko, V.E. (2016). Tekhnointellektualizatciia kultury kak filosofskaia problema [Techno-intellectualization of culture as a philosophical problem]. Rozvіtok osnovnikh napriamіv sotcіogumanіtarnikh nauk: problemi і perspektivi [Development of the main directions of socio-humanities: problems and perspectives]. Zbіrnik statei ta tez dopovіdei za materіalami ІІІ Vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktichnoi konferentcіi z mіzhnarodnoju uchastju – Proceedings of The Third All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference. (pp. 65-67). Dnіprodzerzhinsk: DDTU [in Russian].
6. Karpenko, T.M. (2013). Liudstvo yak subiekt i yak obiekt NBICS-konverhentsii [Humanity as a subject and as an object of the NBICS-convergence]. Fіlosofіia nauki: traditcіi ta іnovatcіi, 6, 278-288 [in Ukrainian].
7. Lebedev, S.A. (2015). Peresborka epistemologicheskogo [Reassembly of the epistemological]. Voprosy filosofii, 6, 53-64 [in Russian].
8. Мамаrdаshvili, M. K. (1984). Кlassicheskie I neklassicheskie idealu ratsionalnosti [Classical and non-classical ideals of rationality]. Tbilisi: Меtsniereba [in Russian].
9. Romanov, A.A., & Vasiljev, G.V. (2014). Massovue communikatsii [Mass Communications]. Moscow: Vuzovskij ychebnik [in Russian].
10. Khabermas, Yu. (2000). Moralnoe soznanie I communikativnoe dejstvie [Moral consciousness and communicative action]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka [in Russian].
11. Chapligіn, O.K. (2015). Transgumanіzm u suchasnomu liudinoznavstvі: perspektivi і vikliki [Transhumanism in modern human sciences: perspectives and challenges]. Fіlosofіia u suchasnomu svіtі – Philosophy in the modern world: Proceedings of The Urban Interuniversity Scientific and Practical Seminar. (pp. 69-72). Kharkiv: «Tochka» [in Ukrainian].
12. Shyuts, A. (1988). Struktura povsednevnogo mushleniya [Structure of everyday thinking]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, 2, 129-137 [in Russian].
Published
2018-06-14
How to Cite
Kravtsov, Y. (2018). Communicative rationality as a phenomenological component of legal identification. Grani, 21(5), 109-114. https://doi.org/10.15421/171875
Section
Статті