Anthropomorphiс formidentinents-markers of significative field of catholic ethnoreligious space

  • V. I. Kryachko Institute for sociology, psychology and social communications of the National pedagogical Dragomanov university
Keywords: anthropomorphism, ethnicity, ethno­religious space, identinent, Catholicism, marker, space, significative field, symbol, system

Abstract

The paper deals with an attempt to explicate the anthropomorphic formidentinents­markers of the significative field of Catholic ethnoreligious space on the basis of developed by the author model of the structure of significative field of Catholicism as the exposed system ща religious, cultural, ethnic, social and other markers, which is consisted of the following basic significative structural subsystems: 1) anthropomorphic significative subsystem, which includes human­similar (manlike) and personificated symbolic constructions, monuments and architectural ensembles, as well as symbols of human body parts, their combinations and signals; 2) zoomorphic significative subsystem, which includes animal­similar significative constructions and signs of their separate bodyparts, as well as symbols of their lifeproducts; 3) vegetomorphic significative subsystem, which includes plant­similar significative elements and food products; 4) geomorphic significative subsystem; 5) geometric significative subsystem; 6) astral significative subsystem; 7) coloristic significative subsystem; 8) topos­instalative significative subsystem; 9) objective­instrumental significative subsystem; 10) architectural exterior­interior significative subsystem; 11) abstractive significative subsystem; 12) actional significative subsystem. Anthropomorphic significative subsystem with its formidentinents­markers of the significative field of Catholic ethnoreligious space includes visualized in space anthropomorphic and personificated symbolic constructions and formelements, that are explicated via objective­material patterns: paintings, architecture, etc., and are often linked with various religious and ethnic symbolic systems. The urgency of the study of this problem is related to the increasing scientific interest of scientists in the study of the ethno-religious space of various parts of the world in the context of ecumenism and the growing intentions of various religious subjects (representatives of various religious systems) in relation to the design of models for the establishment of interreligious, interethnic, interconfessional, intercultural dialogues . The study of the subjects of the anthropomorphic (personified) forms of the syntivistic field of the Catholic ethno-religious space can promote, as we believe, the development of intercultural evolution technologies (in particular, based on the theory of evacuation by Polish professor Jagiellonian University Leshek Korporovich and its other researchers) in order to improve the quality of social and educational programs for various religious and ethnic subjects, communities and systems. Consequently, the relevance of the chosen theme of the article follows from the problem that has developed in this area of research, namely: the contradiction between the presence of a plurality of sources devoted to the theoretical foundations of Catholicism and the small representation of integral theoretical works on the ethnosociology of religion, devoted to the study of the anthropomorphic form-adjectives-markers of the syntactic field of the Catholic ethnoreligic space in the context of ecumenism.

References

Bibleyskiy spravochnik Gelleya [Perevod s angliyskogo Rybakova O.A.] (Halley’s Bible Handbook) [Rybakov O. translation from English]. Sankt­Peterburg, 2012. 787 p.

Bibliya. Vydannya Kyjivskoji Patriarkhiji Ukrajinskoji Pravoslavnoji Cerkvy Kyjivskogho Patriarkhatu [Pereklad Patriarkha Filareta (Denysenka M.A.)] (Bible. Publication of Kyiv Patriarchate of Ukrainian Ortodox Church [Translation of Patriarch Filaret (Denysenko M.A.)]). Kyiv, 2009. 1416 p.

Yevtukh V.B. Etnichnist: encyclopedychnyy dovidnyk (Ethnicity : Encyclopaedic handbook).Kyiv,2012.396p.

Yevtukh V.B. Etnosociologiya: dovidnyk (Ethnosociology: reference book). Kyiv, 2011. 205 p.

Katekhysm Katolyckoyi Tserkvy (Catechism of the Catholic Church). Regime to access: http://www.catechismus.org.ua/

Katekhysm Katolyckoyi Tserkvy (Catechism of the Catholic Church). – Lviv, 2002. 772 p.

Kryachko V.I. Sotsiodiagnostychnyy rakurs ukrayins’koyi mentalnosti (Sociodiagnostical aspect of Ukrainian mentality). Kyiv, 2012. 248 p.

Lyudstvo i vira: Vsesvitnya istoriya narodiv i religiy: Entsyklopedychno­dovidkove vydannya (Humanity and faith: World history of peoples and religions: encyclopedic­reference edition) [Shchokin G. eds.]. Kyiv, 2002. 640 p.

Mify narodov mira. Entsyklopediya: v 2­h tomakh (Myths of the peoples of the world. Encyclopedia: in 2 volumes) [Tokarev S.A. eds.]. Moskva, 1992. 671 p.: illus; 719 p.: illus.

Nustrem Eric. Bibleyskiy slovar’ (Bible dictionary) [Пер. со шведского под ред. И. С. Свенсона Translated and edited from Swedish by Svenson I.S.]. Sankt­Peterburg, 2011. 537 p.

Piren M.I. Sotsiologiya religiyi: pidruchnyk (Sociology of religion: textbook). Kyiv, 2008. 344 p.

Polnaya entsyklopediya simvolov (Full encyclopedia of symbols). Moskva, 2007. 515 p.

Pro nas (About us). Center for evaluation of scientific­educational and social programs. Regime to access: http://evaluation.com.ua/pro­nas/

Romanenko Y.V., Svyatnenko I.O., Zinchenko A.A. Vizualizatsiyi v mediyno­komunikatsiynomu prostori: sotsio­systemologichnyy pidkhid (Visualizations in the media­communicative space: socio­systemological approach). Kyiv, 2014. 487 p.

Romanenko Y.V. Mekhanizmy symvolichnoyi interaktsiyi v komunikatsiyakh, politytsi, mystetstvi: vizualno­analitychnyy ta sotsiosymvolichnyy aspekty (Mechanisms of symbolic interaction in communications, politics, art: visual­analytical and sociosymbolic aspects). Kyiv, 2011. 301 p.

Svyate Pysmo Starogo I Novogo Zavitu (Holy Scripture of Old and New Testaments). Misioner, 2007. 1477 p.

Sonina T.V. Italiya. XIII – nachalo XVI veka: Biograficheskiy slovar’ (Khudozhniki Zapadnoy Yevropy) (Italy. XIII – beginning of the XVI century: Biographical dictionary (The artists of the Western Europe)). Sankt­Peterburg, 2010. 720 p.: illus.

Sotsiologiya: pidruchnyk (Sociology: textbook) [Gorodyanenko eds.]. Kyiv, 2008. 544 p.

Amazing Discoveries Albums. Amazing Discoveries. Regime to access: http://amazingdiscoveries.org/albums

Campbell William. Religion, identity and ethnicity: the contribution of Paul the Apostle. Journal of Beliefs & Values, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2008. – P. 139­150.

Korporowicz Leszek. Rozwojowa misja ewaluacji (Development mission of evaluation). Animacja Zycia Publicznego. Analizy i rekomendacje, Nr. 4 (11), 2013. S. 4­7.

Lingvo Online [Electronic resource]. – Regime to access: http://www.lingvo.ua/uk

Malesevic Sinisa. The Sociology of Ethnicity. London: SAGE Publications, 2004. 208 р.

Marti Gerardo. Fluid Ethnicity and Ethnic Transcendence in Multiracial Churches. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, No. 47 (1), 2008. – P. 11­16.

Safran William. Language, Ethnicity and Religion: a Complex and Persistent Linkage. Nations and Nationalism, No. 14 (1), 2008. – P. 171­190.

Sayce A.H. Assyria, Its Princes, Priests and People. By­Paths of Bible Knowledge VII. Regime to access: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/42033/42033­h/42033­h.htm

The Holy See: Official web­site. Regime to access: http://w2.vatican.va/content/vatican/en.html

Published
2014-12-25
How to Cite
Kryachko, V. I. (2014). Anthropomorphiс formidentinents-markers of significative field of catholic ethnoreligious space. Scientific and Theoretical Almanac Grani, 18(1), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.15421/1715016
Section
Article