Multiculturalism and the problems of self-determination of ethnocultural minorities


  • Irada Nuriyeva Azerbaijan State University of Oil and Industry
Keywords: multiculturalism, state policy, right to self-determination, national and cultural autonomy

Abstract

The article on «Multiculturalism and the problems of self-determination of ethnocultural minorities» covers an explanation of the multiculturalism concept, its manifestation in state policy and the solution of the problem of self-determination of national minorities and ethnic groups in international practice. The similar and distinctive features are derived and shown with Nagorno-Karabakh, which is the territory of the Republic of Azerbaijan.  Self-determination can be achieved without the formation of the new sovereign states. There is also another level of self-determination in the international practice: national and cultural autonomy promoting the preservation by the representatives of different ethnic communities, in particular, by small ethnic groups, national and other minorities, of their own way of life, their languages, cultures, traditions, etc. within the supremacy of territorial integrity and the sovereign rights of the states on the territories they live.  Any nation, any population can survive and develop in case of preservation of specify of their culture, cultural identity. Azerbaijan firmly adheres to the principles of an independent, legal and democratic society. The Republic of Azerbaijan has always stated that the protection of the rights and freedom of citizens is regarded as a determining factor in the existence of a democratic society.

References

1. Eisenberg, A.( 2002). Ravenstvo, doverie i mul’tikul’turalizm [Equality, trust and multiculturalism]. Trust for social diversity, (pp. 1-30) [in Russian].
2. Europen Charter for Regional of Minority languages. (1992). Strasburg [in Russian].
3. Krylova, I.S. (1993). Nacional’naja samobytnost’ naroda i pravovoe regulirovanie [National identity of a people and legal regulation]. State, law and interethnic relations in the countries of Western democracy, (pp.104-105). Moscow [in Russian].
4. Krylova, N.S., & Vasilyeva, T.A. (1993). Avtonomija kak sposob uregulirovanija mezhjetnicheskih otnoshenij [Autonomy as a way of settling interethnic relations]. State, law and interethnic relations in the countries of Western democracy. Moscow [in Russian].
5. Kymlicka, W. ( 2004). Politika, uchityvajushhaja kul’turnye osobennosti [Cultural responsive policies]. United Nations development programmer human development report office, 5 [in Russian].
6. Kamal, Ali. (2011). 10 statusov dlja Nagornogo Karabaha [10 statuses for Upper Garabagh]. South Caucasus, Central Asia and the CIS in the world press South Caucasus. Retrieved from: http://azeritoday.com/archives/23762 [in Russian].
7. Konstitucija Azerbajdzhanskoj Respubliki [Constitution of the Republic of Azerbaijan]. (1995). Baku.
8. Lapidoth, Ruth. (1999). Les Caracteristiques de L’autonomie, in Centre europeen des questions de minorities (Ecmi). Autonomies insularies: versunepolitique de la difference pour la Corse, (pp. 26-33). Albania.
9. Ronan Le Cоadic. (2003). Multiculturalysm. Retrieved from: ethno-photo.livejournal.com/15997.html [in Russian].
10. Stojanovic, N. (2003). Shvejcarskoe nacional’noe gosudarstvo i ego patriotizm – kritika otcheta Uilla Kimlika, posvjashhennogo mnogojazychnym gosudarstvam [Swiss nation-state and its patriotism a critique of Will Kymlick’s account of multination states]. Polis, 11, 49 [in Russian].
11. Tishkov, V. (1997). Ocherki teorii i politiki jetnichnosti v Rossii [Essays on the theory and policy of ethnicity in Russia]. Moscow: Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences [in Russian].
12. Troitskaya, O. (2012). Velikobritanija soglasilas’ s pravom Shotlandii na samoopredelenie [UK agreed with the right of Scotland to self-determination]. Retrieved from: http://www/ng.ru/courier/2012-03-05/10 scotland/html [in Russian].
Published
2018-05-06
How to Cite
Nuriyeva, I. (2018). Multiculturalism and the problems of self-determination of ethnocultural minorities. Grani, 21(4), 34-39. https://doi.org/10.15421/171854
Section
Статті